Advertisement

Beyond Party Government? Technocratic Trends in Society and in the Executive

  • António Costa Pinto
  • Maurizio Cotta
  • Pedro Tavares de Almeida
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Political Leadership book series (PSPL)

Abstract

This book proposes to analyse, in a sample of European countries, the weight of technocracy in governments with the ambition of providing, in the first place, an accurate mapping of the phenomenon and, secondly, to explore some of the potential explanatory factors of its growing presence in Political Leadership. Our study concentrates its attention on Europe for three main reasons: First, this is the region of the world where party government has found its fullest development, but also where the party systems generated by the recent waves of democratization have been considered as substantially weaker. Secondly, Europe is the region where the parliamentary form of government is the most diffuse, but also where, in recent times, semi-presidential forms of governments have proliferated. Thirdly, Europe has seen with the EU, the development of a particularly strong form of multi-level governance. There are thus good reasons for an in-depth exploration of cabinet recruiting patterns in this area of the world.

In the introductory chapter, we will provide a more systematic overview of the existing literature, before, in the final section, describing our research strategy, the selection of cases and the operationalization of the variables.

Keywords

Technocracy Ministers Political elite Democracy Political parties 

References

  1. Akin, W. E. (1977). Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (2008). Bureaucrats or Politicians? Part II: Multiple Policy Tasks. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 426–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexiadou, D. (2016). Ideologues, Partisans, and Loyalists: Ministers and Policymaking in Parliamentary Cabinets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexiadou, D., & Gunaydin, H. (2015). Selecting the Right Minister: The Appointments and Policy Effects of Technocrat and Expert Ministers. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual European Political Science Association Conference, June, Vienna.Google Scholar
  5. Allum, P. A. (1995). State and Society in Western Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Amorim Neto, O., & Samuels, D. (2010). Democratic Regimes and Cabinet Politics: A Global Perspective. RIEC–Revista Ibero Americana de Estudos Legislativos, 1, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amorim Neto, O., & Strøm, K. (2006). Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Nonpartisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 619–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bäck, H., Dumont, P., Meier, H. E., Persson, T., & Vernby, K. (2009). Does European Integration Lead to a Presidentialization of Executive Politics? Ministerial Selection in Swedish Post-war Cabinets. European Union Politics, 10, 226–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baturo, A. (2016). Cursus Honorum: Personal Background. Career and Experience of Political Leaders in Democracy and Dictatorship – New Data and Analyses. Politics and Governance, 4(2), 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beckman, L. (2006). The Competent Cabinet? Ministers in Sweden and the Problem of Competence and Democracy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Bertsou, E., & Pastorella, G. (2015). Technocracy: A Citizens’ Perspective. Paper presented at the ECPR Annual Conference, August, Montreal.Google Scholar
  13. Best, H., & Cotta, M. (Eds.). (2000). Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848–2000. Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Blondel, J., & Cotta, M. (Eds.). (1996). Party and Government: An Inquiry into the Relationship Between Governments and Supporting Parties in Liberal Democracies. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  15. Blondel, J., & Cotta, M. (Eds.). (2000). The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  16. Blondel, J., & Müller-Rommel, F. (Eds.). (1993). Governing Together: The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision-Making in Western European Cabinets. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  17. Blondel, J., Muller-Rommel, F., & Malová, D. (Eds.). (2007). Governing New European Democracies. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. Blondel, J., & Thiébault, J.-L. (Eds.). (1991). The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Borchert, J., & Zeiss, J. (2003). The Political Class in Advanced Democracies: A Comparative Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brunclik, M. (2015). The Rise of Technocratic Cabinets What We Know, and What We Should Like to Know. OZP – Austrian Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 57–67.Google Scholar
  21. Calise, M., & Mannheimer, R. (1982). Governanti in Italia: un trentennio repubblicano, 1946–1976. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
  22. Centeno, M. A., & Silva, P. (Eds.). (1998). The Politics of Expertise in Latin America. New York: St Martin’s.Google Scholar
  23. Comte, A. (1851–1854). Système de politique positive ou Traité de sociologie instituant la religion de l’Humanité. Paris: Carilian-Gœury et V. Dalmont.Google Scholar
  24. Cotta, M. (1991). Conclusion: From the Simple World of Party Government to a More Complex View of Party-Government Relationships. In J. Blondel & J.-L. Thiébault (Eds.), The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe (pp. 174–198). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cotta, M., & Best, H. (2007). Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change, and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dalton, R. J., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dargent, E. (2015). Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America. The Expert Running Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Winter, L. (1991). Parliamentary and Party Pathways to the Cabinet. In J. Blondel & J.-L. Thiébault (Eds.), The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe (pp. 44–69). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dogan, M. (1979). How to Become a Cabinet Minister in France: Career Pathways, 1870–1978. Comparative Politics, 12, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. DonVito, P. A. (1969). The Essentials of a Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (No. RAND-P-4124). Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  31. Dowding, K. (2013). The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister. Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 617–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dumont, P., Fiers, S., & Dandoy, R. (2009). Belgium: Ups and Downs of Ministerial Careers in a Partitocratic Federal State. In K. Dowding & P. Dumont (Eds.), The Selection of Ministers in Europe: Hiring and Firing (pp. 124–146). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Duverger, M. (1980). A New Political System Model: Semi-presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research, 8, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Elgie, R. (1999). Semi-presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-presidentialism: Sub-types and Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Engelen, E., Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., Moran, M., et al. (2012). Misrule of Experts? The Financial Crisis as Elite Debacle. Economy and Society, 41(3), 360–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fisichella, D. (1965). Il potere nella società industriale. Saint Simon e Comte. Napoli: Morano.Google Scholar
  40. Fleischer, J., & Seyfried, M. (2015). Drawing from the Bargaining Pool: Determinants of Ministerial Selection in Germany. Party Politics, 21, 503–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Foley, M. (1993). The Rise of the British Presidency. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Fourquet, F. (1980). Les comptes de la puissance, Histoire de la comptabilité nationale et du Plan. Paris: Éditions Recherches.Google Scholar
  43. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  44. Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  45. Headey, B. (1974). British Cabinet Ministers: The Roles of Politicians in Executive Office. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  46. Helms, L. (1996). Executive Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies: The British Prime Minister and the German Chancellor Compared. German Politics, 5(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Helms, L. (2005). The Presidentialisation of Political Leadership: British Notions and German Observations. The Political Quarterly, 76, 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hira, A. (2007). Should Economists Rule the World? Trends and Implications of Leadership Patterns in the Developing World, 1960–2005. International Political Science Review, 28, 325–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johansson, K., & Raunio, T. (2010). Organizing the Core Executive for European Union Affairs: Comparing Finland and Sweden. Public Administration, 88, 649–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Johansson, K. M., & Tallberg, J. (2010). Explaining Chief Executive Empowerment: EU Summitry and Domestic Institutional Change. West European Politics, 33, 208–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaiser, A., & Fischer, J. (2009). Linkages Between Parliamentary and Ministerial Careers in Germany, 1949–2008: The Bundestag as Recruitment Pool. German Politics, 18(2), 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kaplan, S. B. (2016). Partisan Technocratic Cycles in Latin America. Paper prepared for the conference Fat Politics, Lean Politics: Political Survival in Good and Bad Times, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
  53. Katz, R. S. (1986). Party Government: A Rationalistic Conception. In F. Castles & R. Wildnemann (Eds.), Visions and Realities of Party Government (pp. 31–71). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  54. King, A. (1981). The Rise of the Career Politician in Britain – And Its Consequences. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 249–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Krouwel, A. (2012). Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  56. Linz, J. J., & Shain, I. (1994). Between States: Interim Governments in Democratic Transitions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics, 17, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Margairaz, M. (Ed.). (1989). Pierre Mendès France et l’économie: pensée et action. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  59. Martinez-Gallardo, C., & Schleiter, P. (2015). Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 48(2), 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McAllister, I. (2007). The Personalization of Politics. In R. J. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 571–588). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. McDonnell, D., & Valbruzzi, M. (2014). Defining and Classifying and Technocratic-Led and Technocratic Governments. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 654–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Metcalf, L. K. (2000). Measuring Presidential Power. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 660–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Meynaud, J. (1964). La technocratie. Mythe ou réalité. Paris: Les Éditions Payot.Google Scholar
  64. Meynaud, J. (Ed.). (1967). Les pouvoirs de décision dans l’État moderne. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
  65. Pakulski, J., & Tranter, B. (2015). The Decline of Political Leadership in Australia? Changing Recruitment and Careers of Federal Politicians. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  66. Pastorella, G. (2015). Technocratic Governments in Europe. Getting the Critique Right. Political Studies, online version, 1–17.Google Scholar
  67. Pedrazzani, A. (2017). Fare le leggi nella Seconda Repubblica. Milano: Egea.Google Scholar
  68. Pettit, P. (2004). Depoliticizing Democracy. Ratio Juris, 17(1), 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pinto, A. C., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (2009). Portugal: The Primacy of “Independents”. In K. Dowding & P. Dumont (Eds.), The Selection of Ministers in Europe. Hiring and Firing (pp. 147–158). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (Eds.). (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics: a comparative study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Protsyk, O. (2005a). Politics of Intra-executive Conflict in Semi-presidential Regimes in Eastern Europe. Eastern European Politics and Societies, 19, 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Protsyk, O. (2005b). Prime Ministers’ Identity in Semi-presidential Regimes: Constitutional Norms and Cabinet Formation Outcomes. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 771–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Protsyk, O. (2006). Intra-executive Competition Between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Co-operation Under semi-presidentialism. Political Studies, 54, 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Protsyk, O. (2011). Semi-presidentialism Under Post-communism. In R. Elgie, S. Moestrup, & Y.-S. Wu (Eds.), Semi-presidentialism and Democracy (pp. 98–116). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Putnam, R. (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  76. Putnam, R. D. (1977). Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies: An Empirical Assessment of the Theory of Technocracy. Comparative Political Studies, 10, 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rodríguez Teruel, J. (2010). Gobierno parlamentario sin ministros parlamentarios? La influencia de la descentralización en las carreras de la elite ministerial española. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 24, 83–105.Google Scholar
  78. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). La Légitimité démocratique. Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  79. Saint Simon, C.-H. (1821). Du système industriel. Paris: Renourad.Google Scholar
  80. Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2017). From a Deficit of Democracy to a Technocratic Order: The Postcrisis Debate on Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schick, A. (1966). Planning-Programming-Budgeting System: A Symposium. Public Administration Review, 26, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schleiter, P., & Morgan-Jones, E. (2009). Constitutional Power and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets. American Political Science Review, 103, 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sedelius, T., & Mashtaler, O. (2013). Two Decades of Semi-presidentialism: Issues of Intra-executive Conflict in Central and Easter Europe 1991–2011. East European Politics, 29, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shugart, M., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Siaroff, A. (2003). Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Silva, P. (2009). In the Name of Reason: Technocrats and Politics in Chile. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Strøm, K. (2000a). Parties at the Core of Government. In R. Dalton & M. P. Warrenberg (Eds.), Making and Breaking Governments (pp. 180–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Strøm, K. (2000b). ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 261–290.Google Scholar
  89. Tavares de Almeida, P., Pinto, A. C., & Bermeo, N. (Eds.). (2003). Who Governs Southern Europe. Regime Change and Ministerial Recruitment. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  90. Van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, Going, … Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Veblen, T. (1921). The Engineers and the Price System. New York: B. W. Huebsch.Google Scholar
  92. Webb, P., & Poguntke, T. (2013). The Presidentialisation of Politics Thesis Defended. Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 646–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Whiteley, P. F. (2011). Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership Across the Democratic World. Party Politics, 17, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Williams, M. E. (2006). Escaping the Zero-Sum Scenario: Democracy Versus Technocracy in Latin America. Political Science Quarterly, 121, 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2000). Party Government in 48 Democracies (1945–1998): Composition, Duration, Personnel. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluver Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yong, B., & Bennister, M. (2011). Putting Goats Amongst the Wolves: Appointing Ministers from Outside Parliament in the UK. Paper presented at the 6th ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik.Google Scholar
  97. Yong, B., & Hazel, R. (2011). Putting Goats Amongst the Wolves: Appointing Ministers from Outside the Parliament. London: The Constitution Unit, UCL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • António Costa Pinto
    • 1
  • Maurizio Cotta
    • 2
  • Pedro Tavares de Almeida
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Social Science, University of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Social, Political and Cognitive SciencesUniversity of SienaSienaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Political StudiesNova UniversityLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations