Learning from Carceral Tours: Reflections After a Howard Tour Across Europe
This chapter draws from a study of the role of prisons in Europe for which the research was undertaken by visiting prisons in six countries, as well as by reading, by observing and by listening to those who could say something about those prisons. The aim of the chapter is twofold. On the one hand, it wants to comment on the methodological choices and consequences of a so-called prison tourism design. It is argued that, in spite of ethical challenges and intrinsic epistemological deficiencies, studying prisons and prison systems from a prison tourist perspective has the potential to provide unique and special information and can shed light on questions and themes that are not on the agenda of international monitoring bodies. On the other hand, the chapter summarises some of the findings about the countries that have been visited and draws general conclusions about the study as a whole and reflects on the differences between prison tourist findings and what official international monitoring bodies report on.
KeywordsPrison tourism Monitoring Comparative penology
- Boone, M. 2012. Eigen boeven eerst. Insluiting en uitsluiting in de sanctietoepassing. Den Haag: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Casale, S. 2009. A System of Preventive Oversight. Essex Human Rights Review 1: 6–14.Google Scholar
- Dey, E. 2009. Prison Tours as a Research Tool in the Golden Gulag. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 18: 119–125.Google Scholar
- Downes, D. 1988. Contrasts in Tolerance: Post-war Penal Policy in the Netherlands and England and Wales. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Dünkel, F. 2016. The Rise and Fall of Prison Population Rates in Europe. Newsletter of the European Society of Criminology 15 (2): 2–5.Google Scholar
- Howard, J. 1764. An Account of the Degree of Cold Observed in Bedfordshire. Philosophical Transactions 54: 118.Google Scholar
- ———. 1791. An Account of the Principal Lazarettos in Europe. With Various Papers Relative to the Plague: Together with Further Observations on Some Foreign Prisons and Hospitals; and Additional Remarks on the Present State of Those in Great Britain and Ireland. London: Johnson, Dilly and Cadell.Google Scholar
- ———. 1792. The State of the Prisons in England and Wales with Preliminary Observations, and an Account of Some Foreign Prisons and Hospitals. 4th ed. London: Johnson, Dilly and Cadell.Google Scholar
- Huckelbury, C. 2009. Tour de farce. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 18: 126–128.Google Scholar
- International Centre for Prison Studies. 2013a. Azerbaijan. World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/azerbaijan. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.
- ———. 2013b. Netherlands. World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/netherlands. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.
- ———. 2014a. France. World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/france. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.
- ———. 2014b. Italy. World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/italy. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.
- ———. 2014c. Norway. World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/norway. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.
- ———. 2014d. United Kingdom: England & Wales. World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/united-kingdom-england-wales. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.
- Liebling, A. 2004. Prisons and Their Moral Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2015. Appreciative Inquiry, Generative Theory, and the ‘Failed State’ Prison. In Advances in Criminological Theory, ed. J. Miller and W. Palacios, 251–270. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- McConville, S. 1995. Local Justice. In The Oxford History of the Prison. The Practice of Punishment in Western Society, ed. N. Morris and D. Rothman, 297–327. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Minogue, C. 2009. The Engaged Specific Intellectual: Resisting Unethical Prison Tourism and the Hubries of Objectifying Modality of the Universal Intellectual. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 18: 129–142.Google Scholar
- Nagelsen, S., and C. Huckelbury. 2009. The Prisoner’s Role in Ethnographic Examinations of the Carceral State. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 18: 111–118.Google Scholar
- Piché, J., and K. Walby. 2009. Dialogue on the Status of Prison Ethnography and Carceral Tours: An Introduction. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 18: 88–90.Google Scholar
- Shalev, S. 2013. Supermax. Controlling Risk Through Solitary Confinement. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van Swaaningen, R. 2013. Reversing the Puntive Turn: The Case of the Netherlands. In European Penology? ed. T. Daems, D. van Zyl Smit, and S. Snacken, 339–360. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
- Vander Beken, T. 2015a. Howardreizen. De rol van de gevangenis in Europa. Antwerp-Apeldoorn: Maklu.Google Scholar
- ———. 2015b. Travels with John: the Function of Prisons in Europe. Independent Monitor 115: 10–12.Google Scholar
- West, T. 2011. The Curious Mr. Howard. Legendary Prison Reformer. Hook: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, R., and K. Pickett. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar