Scaling a Reacting Game for Use at a Large Public University

  • Keri Watson
  • Patsy D. Moskal


This chapter takes a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data elements to explore student expectations prior to participation in the Modernism vs. Traditionalism, Art in Paris, 1888–89 game and also reactions to their experience with the game. Student demographic profiles are discussed per types of students for whom Reacting to the Past (RTTP) works best. In addition, student reactions to the game and its incorporation into their art history experience is discussed. Student perceptions of instruction (SPI) are evaluated as well to gauge the change to Reacting to the Past and the impact on student ratings. The faculty perspective also provides valuable information for others interested in scaling Reacting to the Past to larger classes.


  1. Carnes, M. C. (2005). Reacting to the past: Pedagogy manual. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  2. Carnes, M. C. (2014). Minds on fire: How role-immersion games transform college. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Freeman, S. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Klopfer, E. (2008). Augmented learning: Research and design of mobile educational games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McKay, G., Proctor, N. W., & Marlais, M. A. (2014). Modernism vs. traditionalism: Art in Paris, 1888–89. Player game manual version 6.0. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  6. Rapacon, S. (2016). 10 worst college majors for your career. Retrieved from
  7. Steinhauer, J. (2014). Obama loves art history but thinks it’s (economically) useless. Retrieved from
  8. Stroessner, S., Beckerman, L., & Whittaker, A. (2009). All the world’s a stage? Consequences of a role-playing pedagogy on psychological factors and writing and rhetorical skill in college undergraduates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keri Watson
    • 1
  • Patsy D. Moskal
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations