How to Perform Educational Research in Reacting to the Past Settings: A Primer for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

  • Colleen M. Kuusinen
  • C. Edward Watson


This chapter concludes the volume by offering a brief manual regarding how to perform educational research within course settings with a specific emphasis on studying Reacting to the Past. Intended as a primer rather than a comprehensive educational research manual, the chapter reviews protocols and strategies that are easy to employ while also resulting in meaningful findings. The authors provide useful guidelines and recommendations for disseminating findings for readers interested in engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning on RTTP and beyond.


  1. American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Boyer, E. (1991). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  3. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Educational Testing Service (ETS). (2017). Test collection at ETS. Retrieved from
  5. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huber, M. T., Morreale, S. P., & Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, & American Association for Higher Education (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  8. Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of reaching and learning. Menlo Park: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  9. McKinney, K. (Ed.). (2013). The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Shulman, L. S. (1993). Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 25(6), 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research methods knowledge base. Ithaca: Web Center for Social Research Methods. Retrieved from
  15. Vigen, T. (2015). Spurious correlations. New York: Hachette Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen M. Kuusinen
    • 1
  • C. Edward Watson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Association of American Colleges and UniversitiesWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations