Advertisement

Phonosurgery: Transoral Endoscopic Techniques

  • Christian SittelEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Injection laryngoplasty is a transoral technique of vocal fold augmentation in order to close or reduce glottic insufficiency. Unilateral vocal fold paralysis is the most important indication. The technique is an alternative to thyroplasty in many cases, an adjuvant treatment in some. Both options should be offered to the patient and should be considered complementary. Technically, the injection can be done under general anaesthesia or office based in the awake patient. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are discussed. There is a variety of injection materials with significant differences in characteristics, mode of application and indication. A review of substances available and used in clinical routine is performed. With proper patient and material selection, injection laryngoplasty plays a major role in the treatment of many patients with dysphonia.

Keywords

Vocal fold injection Vocal fold insufficiency Vocal fold augmentation Injection laryngoplasty material Injection laryngoplasty substance Office-based laryngoplasty Voice rehabilitation Vocal fold paralysis Vox Implants Polydimethylsiloxane Collagen Calcium hydroxylapatite Autologous fascia Hyaluronic acid Cymetra Radiesse Recurrent laryngeal nerve 

Supplementary material

Video 10.1

Injection laryngoplasty with Vox Implants in suspension microlaryngoscopy. Procedure documented in real time without editing (MP4 44646 kb)

Video 10.2

Subglottic overfilling, avoiding passive mobility of the stiffened vocal fold with poor functional outcome (MP4 5985 kb)

Video 10.3

Delicate and atrophic vocal folds in an elderly woman. PDMS particles can be repositioned well immediately after injection (MP4 31325 kb)

Video 10.4

Severe dysphonia due to complete unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis following partial pneumonectomy for bronchial carcinoma (MP4 1410 kb)

Video 10.5

Endoscopic view, same patient as Video 10.4 (MP4 5245 kb)

Video 10.6

Voice result 3 weeks post Vox Implants laryngoplasty, same patient as Video 10.4 (MP4 1855 kb)

Video 10.7

Endoscopic view, same patient as Video 10.6 (MP4 3924 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Koelmel JC, Sittel C. Stimm- und Lebensqualitat nach Injektionslaryngoplastik mit VOX-Implants(R) (Polydimethylsiloxan). Laryngorhinootologie. 2014;93(5):316–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brünings W. Über eine neue Behandlungsmethode der Rekurrenslähmung. Ver Deutsch Laryng. 1911;18:58.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubin HJ. Misadventures with injectable polytef (Teflon). Arch Otolaryngol. 1975;101(2):114–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varvares MA, Montgomery WW, Hillman RE. Teflon granuloma of the larynx: etiology, pathophysiology, and management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995;104(7):511–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Leary MA, Grillone GA. Injection laryngoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39(1):43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hillel AT, Ochsner MC, Johns MM III, Klein AM. A cost and time analysis of laryngology procedures in the endoscopy suite versus the operating room. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(6):1385–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ford CN, Roy N, Sandage M, Bless DM. Rigid endoscopy for monitoring indirect vocal fold injection. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(10):1584–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bove MJ, Jabbour N, Krishna P, Flaherty K, Saul M, Wunar R, et al. Operating room versus office-based injection laryngoplasty: a comparative analysis of reimbursement. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(2):226–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mathison CC, Villari CR, Klein AM, Johns MM III. Comparison of outcomes and complications between awake and asleep injection laryngoplasty: a case-control study. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(7):1417–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clary MS, Milam BM, Courey MS. Office-based vocal fold injection with the laryngeal introducer technique. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2114–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayerhoff RM, Kuo C, Meyer T. A novel approach to the challenging injection laryngoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(5):415–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sardesai MG, Merati AL, Hu A, Birkent H. Impact of patient-related factors on the outcomes of office-based injection laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(8):1806–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman H, McCabe D, McCulloch T, Jin SM, Karnell M. Laryngeal collagen injection as an adjunct to medialization laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(8 Pt 1):1407–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verma SP, Dailey SH. Office-based injection laryngoplasty for the management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis. J Voice. 2014;28(3):382–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ford CN, Bless DM. Clinical experience with injectable collagen for vocal fold augmentation. Laryngoscope. 1986;96(8):863–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Remacle M, Marbaix E, Hamoir M, Bertrand B, van den Eeckhaut J. Correction of glottic insufficiency by collagen injection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;99(6 Pt 1):438–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dahlqvist A, Garskog O, Laurent C, Hertegard S, Ambrosio L, Borzacchiello A. Viscoelasticity of rabbit vocal folds after injection augmentation. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(1):138–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hallen L, Dahlqvist A, Laurent C. Dextranomeres in hyaluronan (DiHA): a promising substance in treating vocal cord insufficiency. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(3):393–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hallen L, Johansson C, Laurent C. Cross-linked hyaluronan (Hylan B gel): a new injectable remedy for treatment of vocal fold insufficiency--an animal study. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(1):107–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan RW, Titze IR. Hyaluronic acid (with fibronectin) as a bioimplant for the vocal fold mucosa. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(7 Pt 1):1142–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Branco A, Rodrigues SA, Fabro AT, Fonseca-Alves CE, Martins RH. Hyaluronic acid behavior in the lamina propria of the larynx with advancing age. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(4):652–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dorbeau C, Marmouset F, Lescanne E, Bakhos D, Moriniere S. Functional assessment of glottal insufficiency treated by hyaluronic acid injection: retrospective 20-case series. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;134(3):145–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heris HK, Daoud J, Sheibani S, Vali H, Tabrizian M, Mongeau L. Investigation of the viability, adhesion, and migration of human fibroblasts in a hyaluronic acid/gelatin microgel-reinforced composite hydrogel for vocal fold tissue regeneration. Adv Health Mater. 2016;5(2):255–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim YS, Choi JW, Park JK, Kim YS, Kim HJ, Shin YS, et al. Efficiency and durability of hyaluronic acid of different particle sizes as an injectable material for VF augmentation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135(12):1311–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Young VN, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rosen CA. Comparison of voice outcomes after trial and long-term vocal fold augmentation in vocal fold atrophy. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(4):934–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pearl AW, Woo P, Ostrowski R, Mojica J, Mandell DL, Costantino P. A preliminary report on micronized alloderm injection laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(6):990–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karpenko AN, Dworkin JP, Meleca RJ, Stachler RJ. Cymetra injection for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(11):927–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bock JM, Lee JH, Robinson RA, Hoffman HT. Migration of Cymetra after vocal fold injection for laryngeal paralysis. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(12):2251–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brandenburg JH, Kirkham W, Koschkee D. Vocal cord augmentation with autogenous fat. Laryngoscope. 1992;102(5):495–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shaw GY, Szewczyk MA, Searle J, Woodroof J. Autologous fat injection into the vocal folds: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(2):177–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bauer CA, Valentino J, Hoffman HT. Long-term result of vocal cord augmentation with autogenous fat. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995;104(11):871–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brandenburg JH, Unger JM, Koschkee D. Vocal cord injection with autogenous fat: a long-term magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Laryngoscope. 1996;106(2 Pt 1):174–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McCulloch TM, Andrews BT, Hoffman HT, Graham SM, Karnell MP, Minnick C. Long-term follow-up of fat injection laryngoplasty for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(7 Pt 1):1235–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reijonen P, Lehikoinen-Soderlund S, Rihkanen H. Results of fascial augmentation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111(6):523–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rihkanen H, Reijonen P, Lehikoinen-Soderlund S, Lauri ER. Videostroboscopic assessment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis after augmentation with autologous fascia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;261(4):177–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Duke SG, Salmon J, Blalock PD, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Fascia augmentation of the vocal fold: graft yield in the canine and preliminary clinical experience. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(5):759–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ellis JC, McCaffrey TV, DeSanto LW, Reiman HV. Migration of Teflon after vocal cord injection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;96(1):63–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ersek RA, Gregory SR, Salisbury AV. Bioplastique at 6 years: clinical outcome studies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(6):1570–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guys JM, Simeoni-Alias J, Fakhro A, Delarue A. Use of polydimethylsiloxane for endoscopic treatment of neurogenic urinary incontinence in children. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2133–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sittel C, Thumfart WF, Pototschnig C, Wittekindt C, Eckel HE. Textured polydimethylsiloxane elastomers in the human larynx: safety and efficiency of use. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(6):646–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Groff GD, Schned AR, Taylor TH. Silicone-induced adenopathy eight years after metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 1981;24(12):1578–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Caballero M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Calvo C, Farre X, Quinto L, Alos L. Polydimethylsiloxane versus polytetrafluoroethylene for vocal fold medialization: histologic evaluation in a rabbit model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;67(1):666–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sittel C. Polydimethylsiloxane particles are not experimental in the human larynx. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;69(2):251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Marotta JS, Widenhouse CW, Habal MB, Goldberg EP. Silicone gel breast implant failure and frequency of additional surgeries: analysis of 35 studies reporting examination of more than 8,000 explants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48(3):354–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Beisang AA 3rd, Ersek RA. Mammalian response to subdermal implantation of textured microimplants. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1992;16(1):83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Allen O. Response to subdermal implantation of textured microimplants in humans. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1992;16(3):227–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Duruisseau O, Wagner I, Fugain C, Chabolle F. Endoscopic rehabilitation of vocal cord paralysis with a silicone elastomer suspension implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131(3):241–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Alves CB, Loughran S, MacGregor FB, Dey JI, Bowie LJ. Bioplastique medialization therapy improves the quality of life in terminally ill patients with vocal cord palsy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002;27(5):387–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sittel C, Echternach M, Federspil PA, Plinkert PK. Polydimethylsiloxane particles for permanent injection laryngoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115(2):103–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hagemann M, Seifert E. The use of polydimethylsiloxane for injection laryngoplasty. World J Surg. 2008;32(9):1940–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mattioli F, Bettini M, Botti C, Busi G, Tassi S, Malagoli A, et al. Polydimethylsiloxane injection laryngoplasty for unilateral vocal fold paralysis: long-term results. J Voice. 2017; doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.12.017.
  52. 52.
    Leuchter I, Giovanni A. Description of complications after injection laryngoplasty with polydimethylsiloxane. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009;130(1):69–72.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Echternach M, Delb W, Wagner M, Sittel C, Verse T, Richter B. Polydimethylsiloxane in the human vocal fold: description of partial explantation. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(2):375–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chhetri DK, Jahan-Parwar B, Hart SD, Bhuta SM, Berke GS. Injection laryngoplasty with calcium hydroxylapatite gel implant in an in vivo canine model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113(4):259–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rosen CA, Gartner-Schmidt J, Casiano R, Anderson TD, Johnson F, Remacle M, et al. Vocal fold augmentation with calcium hydroxylapatite: twelve-month report. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(5):1033–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Carroll TL, Rosen CA. Long-term results of calcium hydroxylapatite for vocal fold augmentation. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(2):313–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    DeFatta RA, Chowdhury FR, Sataloff RT. Complications of injection laryngoplasty using calcium hydroxylapatite. J Voice. 2012;26(5):614–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cohen JC, Reisacher W, Malone M, Sulica L. Severe systemic reaction from calcium hydroxylapatite vocal fold filler. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):2237–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shen T, Damrose EJ, Morzaria S. A meta-analysis of voice outcome comparing calcium hydroxylapatite injection laryngoplasty to silicone thyroplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(2):197–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck SurgeryKlinikum StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations