Civil-War Stories in Lands of Commanded Forgetting: Restoration England and Late Twentieth-Century El Salvador

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores how England and El Salvador have narrated past conflicts in the context of institutionalized forgetting. In the aftermaths of the restoration of the English monarchy in 1660 and the 1992 peace accords in El Salvador, legislators quickly implemented laws of amnesty and oblivion. Despite the differences in the nature of the conflicts and how they were settled, the political elite in both countries emphasised the importance of forgetting the recently ended civil wars to move forward to a peaceful future. Nevertheless, while post-conflict laws called for pardon and oblivion, they also provided different individuals or groups with opportunities to remember and to promote their own narratives of the conflicts.

References

Manuscript Sources

  1. The National Archives of the U.K. (TNA), E 113, Bills and Answers of Defaulting Accountants.Google Scholar

Printed Sources

  1. Appleby, David J. “The Restoration county community: a post-conflict culture”. In The County Community in Seventeenth-Century England and Wales, edited by Jacqueline Eales and Andrew Hopper. (Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2012).Google Scholar
  2. ARENA. “A la conciencia nacional e internacional”. La Prensa Gráfica. 18 March 1993.Google Scholar
  3. ARENA. El Diario de Hoy. 11 August 2011. Paid ad.Google Scholar
  4. Ayala, Diana Verónica. “Funes también debería pedir perdón por las masacres del FMLN”. La Prensa Gráfica. 19 January 2012.Google Scholar
  5. Braddick, Michael. God’s Fury, England’s Fire: A New History of the English Civil Wars. (London: Penguin, 2008).Google Scholar
  6. Bryson, W. H. The Equity Side of the Exchequer: Its Jurisdiction, Administration, Procedures and Records. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  7. Carlin, Norah. The Causes of the English Civil War. (Malden, MA: Wiley, 1999).Google Scholar
  8. Comisión de la Verdad para El Salvador. From Madness to Hope: The 12-year war in El Salvador, 1993. [http://www.usip.org/resources/truth-commission-el-salvador].
  9. “El Mozote y los 20 años del Acuerdo de Paz”. Diario Co-Latino. 18 January 2012.Google Scholar
  10. Escobar Galindo, David. “Las jornadas de abril”. La Prensa Gráfica. 2 May 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Flores, Roberto. “Presidente Funes instruye a militares revisar su interpretación de la historia”. Diario Co-Latino. 17 January 2012.Google Scholar
  12. Flores, Roberto, and Iván Escobar. “‘Este pedido de perdón no pretende borrar el dolor’: Presidente Funes”. Diario Co-Latino. 16 January 2012.Google Scholar
  13. “Forenses no hallan osamentas en Sumpul”. El Diario de Hoy. 21 May 1993.Google Scholar
  14. Giuseppi, M.S. Guide to the Contents of the Public Record Office: Volume I: Legal Records, Etc. (London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1963).Google Scholar
  15. Gowing, Laura. Domestic Dangers: Women, Words and Sex in Early Modern London. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  16. Great Britain. Statues of the Realm: 1215–1713, vol. v [S.R. v]. (London: H.M. Stationer’s Office, 1963).Google Scholar
  17. “Hallan osamentas de mujeres y niños masacrados por el FMLN”. El Diario de Hoy. 20 April 1993.Google Scholar
  18. “Hoy inician excavaciones en supuesta matanza Sumpul”. El Diario de Hoy. 18 May 1993.Google Scholar
  19. “Hoy inician exhumación de víctimas masacradas por FMLN”. El Diario de Hoy. 13 April 1993.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes, Ann. The Causes of the English Civil War. (New York: Palgrave, 1998).Google Scholar
  21. “Identifican a masacrados por FMLN”. El Diario de Hoy. 15 April 1993.Google Scholar
  22. Keeble, N. H. The Restoration: England in the 1660 s. (Oxford: Wiley, 2002).Google Scholar
  23. Knights, Mark. “The Tory Interpretation of History in the Rage of Parties”. Huntingdon Library Quarterly 68 (2005): 352–373.Google Scholar
  24. Lacy, Andrew. The Cult of King Charles the Martyr. (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  25. Le Goff, Jacques. History and Memory, translated by Steven Rendall and Elizabeth Claman. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  26. Ley de Amnistía General para la Consolidación de la Paz. Decreto N. 486. San Salvador: 1993.Google Scholar
  27. Licklider, Roy. “Obstacles to Peace Settlements”. In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela R. Aall. (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  28. “Los verdaderos héroes y heroínas son las víctimas civiles de la Guerra”. Diario Co-Latino. 20 January 2012.Google Scholar
  29. Margolf, Diane C. “Adjudicating Memory: Law and Religious Difference in early seventeenth-century France”. Sixteenth Century Journal 26 (1996): 399–418.Google Scholar
  30. Mejía, Amílcar, and Valeria Menjívar. “Alcaldía conmemora en el Obelisco de la Paz”. La Prensa Gráfica. 17 January 2012.Google Scholar
  31. “Mensaje del señor presidente de la República, Licenciado Alfredo Cristiani, con respeto al Informe de la Comisión de la Verdad”. La Prensa Gráfica. 16 March 1993.Google Scholar
  32. “Mensaje dirigido a la nacion por el excelentismo señor presidents de la República, Licenciado Felix Alfredo Cristiani”. La Prensa Gráfica. 19 March 1993.Google Scholar
  33. Minow, Martha. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  34. Morán, Gloria. “Derogar Amnistía, un paso para la democracia”. Contrapunto. 25 September 2013, [http://www.contrapunto.com.sv/ddhh/derogar-amnistia-un-paso-para-la-democracia].
  35. Neufeld, Matthew. The Civil Wars After 1660: Public Remembering in Late Stuart England. (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2013).Google Scholar
  36. Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire”. Representations 26 (1989): 7–24.Google Scholar
  37. Osborne, Peter. The Practice of the Exchequer Court, with its Severall Offices and Officers. (London: T. Roycroft, 1658).Google Scholar
  38. “Perdón mutuo y amnistía total propone Cristiani”. La Prensa Gráfica. 15 March 1993.Google Scholar
  39. Pocock, J.G.A. “The Union in British History”. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 10 (2000): 181–196.Google Scholar
  40. “Prescribe proceso en caso del Sumpul dice Fiscalía”. El Diario de Hoy. 19 May 1993.Google Scholar
  41. “Rechazan versión del FMLN sobre masacre N. Trinidad”. El Diario de Hoy. 19 April 1993.Google Scholar
  42. Ricoeur, Paul. Memory, History and Forgetting, translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  43. Roberts, Stephen K. “Public or Private? Revenge and Recovery at the Restoration of Charles II”. Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 59 (1986): 172–188.Google Scholar
  44. Sawday, Jonathan. “Re-Writing a Revolution: History, Symbol and Text in the Restoration”. The Seventeenth Century 7 (1992): 171–199.Google Scholar
  45. Seaward, Paul. The Cavalier Parliament and the Reconstruction of the Old Regime, 1661–1667. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  46. Sprenkels, Ralph. The Price of Peace: The Human Rights Movement in Postwar El Salvador. (Amsterdam: CEDLA, 2005).Google Scholar
  47. Stern, Steve J. Battling for Hearts and Minds: Memory Struggles in Pinochet’s Chile, 1973–1988. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  48. Stern, Steve J. Remembering Pinochet’s Chile: On the Eve of London 1998. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  49. Urbina, Zoraya. “Ochoa Pérez reta al presidente Funes”. Diario Co-Latino. 17 January 2012.Google Scholar
  50. Woolf, Daniel R. “From Hystories to the Historical: Five Transitions in Thinking about the Past, 1500–1700”. In The Uses of History in Early Modern England, edited by Paulina Kewes. (San Mario: University of California Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  51. Wood, Andy. The Memory of the People: Custom and Popular Senses of the Past in Early Modern England. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
  52. Zeledón, Rubén. “Sobre la comisión de la verdad”. El Diario de Hoy. 8 January 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations