Advertisement

The Freedom of the Ancients from a Humean Perspective

  • Bernd Lahno
Chapter

Abstract

David Hume’s theory of social and political order as represented in Russell Hardin’s dual coordination theory seems to conflict with the idea of political liberty as defined in Benjamin Constant’s concept of the ‘liberty of the ancients’. In this chapter, I argue that the apparent tension vanishes once the role of moral approbation in Humes’s theory of the conventional foundation of social and political order is adequately taken into account.

References

  1. Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Binmore, Ken. 2005. Natural Justice. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Constant, Benjamin. 1819. The Liberty of Ancients Compared with That of Moderns. Online Library of Liberty, Liberty Fund. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2251. Retrieved 4 Sept 2015.
  4. de Jasay, Anthony. 2010. Ordered Anarchy and Contractarianism. Philosophy 85: 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferguson, Adam. 1995 [1767]. An Essay on Civil Society, ed. Fania Oz-Salzberger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Festinger, Leon. 1957. Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hardin, Russell. 1988. Morality Within the Limits of Reason. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1989. Political Obligation. In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, ed. Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit, 103–119. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1995. One for All. The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1999. Liberalism. Constitutionalism, and Democracy. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2004. Indeterminacy and Society. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2007. David Hume: Moral and Political Theorist. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2014. Social Yes; Contract No, In Lahno & Brennan 2013/2014, 79–93. RMM 5. http://www.rmm-journal.de/downloads/Article_Hardin.pdf. Retrieved 16 May 15.
  14. Hume, David. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd ed., with text revised and notes by P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed., with text revised and notes by P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. and ed. Alan W. Wood. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lahno, Bernd. 1995. Versprechen. Überlegungen zu einer künstlichen Tugend. München: OIdenbourg.Google Scholar
  18. Lahno, Bernd, and Geoffrey Brennan eds. 2013/14. Can the Social Contract Be Signed by an Invisible Hand? Special Topic of RMM, Vol 4/5 2013/14. http://www.rmm-journal.de/htdocs/st03.html. Retrieved 10 Aug 15.
  19. Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marx, Karl. 1974. Zur Judenfrage. In Marx Engels Werke (MEW) 1, 347–377. Berlin: Dietz. English in: Selected Essays (trans: Stenning, H.J.). London/New York 1926: Leonard Parsons, 40–97.Google Scholar
  21. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1987. The Basic Political Writings. Trans. and eds. A.C. Donald, P. Gay. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  22. Salter, John. 2015. Hume Without Spontaneous Order. In Lahno & Brennan 2013/2014, 26–38. RMM 6. http://www.rmm-journal.de/downloads/Article_Salter.pdf. Retrieved 16 May 15.
  23. Sugden, Robert. 2009. Can an Humean be a Contractarian. In Perspectives in Moral Science, eds. Michael Baurmann, Bernd Lahno, 11–23. Frankfurt: Frankfurt School Verlag. Also RMM 0. http://www.rmm-journal.de/downloads/002_sugden.pdf. Retrieved 10 Aug 15.
  24. Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Why We Cooperate. Cambridge MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Vanberg, Viktor, and James M. Buchanan. 1988. Rational Choice and Moral Order. Analyse und Kritik 10: 138–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Lahno
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations