Advertisement

Reconstruction of the Nipple-Areola Complex

  • Johanna N. Riesel
  • Yoon S. Chun
Chapter

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in women. Increasingly, women are choosing to undergo bilateral or unilateral prophylactic mastectomies in addition to therapeutic mastectomies. Accordingly, reconstructive procedures have also increased by as much as 203%. Breast reconstruction can provide significant psychosocial benefits for women. Nipple and areola reconstruction, a combination of artistic and geometric pursuits, is often the final step in breast reconstruction and has been said to offer patients a sense of “completeness.” However, it must be approached with considerable caution. In this chapter, we will discuss the indications and contraindications, techniques, controversies, alternatives, and future work for nipple and areola reconstruction.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about breast cancer? http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/detailedguide/breast-cancer-keystatistics. Accessed 20 June 2016.
  2. 2.
    Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Matros E. A paradigm shift in US breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alboronoz CR, Matros E, Lee CN, Hudis CA, Pusic AL, Elkin E, Bach PB, Cordeiro PG, Morrow M. Bilateral mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer: the role of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1518–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller H, Kuchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):120–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychosocial contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(5):699–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C, Yueh JH, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(4):389–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(5):1321–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bogue DP, Mungara AK, Thomposon M, Cederna PS. Modified technique for nipple-areolar reconstruction: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(5):1274–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eng JS. Bell flap nipple reconstruction – a new wrinkle. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36(5):485–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ. Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(6):1602–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramakrishnan VV, Mohan D, Villafane O. Twin flap technique for nipple reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39(3):241–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lossing C, Brongo S, Holmstrom H. Nipple reconstruction with a modified S-flap technique. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998;32(3):275–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanabe HY, Tai Y, Kiyokawa K. Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(2):431–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garramone CE, Lam B. Use of AlloDerm in primary nipple reconstruction to improve long-term nipple projection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(6):1663–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nahabedian MY. Secondary nipple reconstruction using local flaps and AlloDerm. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(7):2056–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Evans KK, Rasko Y, Lenert J. The use of calcium hydroxylapatite for nipple projection after failed nipple-areolar reconstruction: early results. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(1):25–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haslik W, Nedomansky J, Hacker S, Nickl S, Shroegendorfer KF. Objective and subjective evaluation of donor-site morbidity after nipple sharing for nipple areola reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(2):168–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Satteson ES, Reynolds MF, Bond AM, Pestana IA. An analysis of complication risk factors in 641 nipple reconstructions. Breast J. 2016;22(4):379–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winocour S, Saksena A, Oh C, Wu PS, Laungani A, Baltxer H, Saint-Cyr M. A systematic review of comparison of autologous, allogenic, and synthetic augmentation grafts in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;137(1):14e–23e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Halvorson EG, Cormican M, West ME, Myers V. Three-dimensional nipple-areola tattooing: a new technique with superior results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(5):1073–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spear SL, Arias J. Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35:232–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williams EH, Rosenberg LZ, Kolm P, de la Torre JI, Fix RJ. Immediate nipple reconstruction on a free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1115–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryHarvard Combined Plastic Surgery Residency ProgramBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations