Advertisement

OpenFOAM® pp 121-131 | Cite as

Drag Model for Coupled CFD-DEM Simulations of Non-spherical Particles

  • Rolf LohseEmail author
  • Ulrich Palzer
Chapter

Abstract

The production and handling of non-spherical granular products plays an important role in many industries. It is often necessary to consider the real particle shape of the real particles as an essential prerequisite for modeling these processes reliably. This work presents a new approach for approximating the drag coefficient of non-spherical particles during simulation. This is based on the representation of the particle shape as a clump of multiple spheres, as it is often used in the Discrete Element Method (DEM). The paper describes the calculation of the drag coefficient based on the arrangement of the spheres within the clump depending on the Reynolds number and the flow direction. Numerical simulations of the flow around regularly- and irregularly shaped particles, as well as experiments in a wind tunnel, are used as the basis of model development. The new drag model is able to describe the drag coefficient for irregularly shaped particles within a wide range of Reynolds numbers. It has been implemented in the toolbox CFDEM\(^{\textregistered }\) coupling. The new drag model is tested within CFD-DEM simulations of particle behavior in a spouted bed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economy and Technology (BMWi) in the framework of the INNO-KOM-Ost project under grant VF130034.

References

  1. 1.
    Haider, A., Levenspiel, O.: Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Technology 58, 63–70, (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loth, E.: Drag of non-spherical solid particles of regular and irregular shape. Powder Technology 182, 342–353, (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swamee, P., Ojha, C.: Drag Coefficient and Fall Velocity of nonspherical particles. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 117, 660–667, (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leith, D.: Drag on Nonspherical Objects. Aerosol Science and Technology 6, 153–161, (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hölzer, A., Sommerfeld, M.: New simple correlation formula for the drag coefficient of non-spherical particles. Powder Technology 184, 361–365, (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DEM-Solutions, EDEM version 2.7, Edinburgh (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Itasca Consultings GmbH, PFC3D version 4.0, Gelsenkirchen, (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker, H.: The Effects of Shape and Reynolds Number on Drag in the Motion of a Freely Oriented Body in an Infinite Fluid. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 37, 85–91, (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kasper, G., Niida, T., Yang, M.: Measurements of Viscous Drag on Cylinders and Chains of Spheres with Aspect Ratios Between 2 and 50. Journal of Aerosol Science 16, 535–556, (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pettyjohn, E. S., Christiansen, E. B.: Effect of Particle Shape on Free-Settling Rates of Isometric Particles. Chemical Engineering Progress 44, 157–172, (1948)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dwyer, H. A., Dandy, D. S.: Some influences of particle shape on drag and heat transfer. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 2, 2110–2118, (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hölzer, A.: Bestimmung des Widerstandes, Auftriebs und Drehmoments und Simulation der Bewegung nichtsphrischer Partikel in laminaren und turbulenten Strmungen mit dem Lattice-Boltzmann-Verfahren. Martin-Luther-Universitt Halle-Wittenberg, 2007Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zastawny, M., Mallouppas, G., Zhao, F., van Wachem, B.: Derivation of drag and lift force and torque coefficients for non-spherical particles in flows. International Journal of Mineral Processing 39, 227–239, (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ganser, G. H.: A rational approach to drag prediction of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Technology 77, 143–152, (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    OpenCFD Ltd. (ESI-Group), OpenFOAM\(^{\textregistered }\) version 2.3, Bracknell, UK (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morrison, F. A.: Data Correlation for Drag Coefficient for Sphere. Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI (2013) Available via http://www.chem.mtu.edu/~fmorriso/DataCorrelationForSphereDrag2013.pdf
  17. 17.
    Schiller, L., Naumann, A.: Über die grundlegenden Berechnungen bei der Schwerkraftaufbereitung. Zeitschrift Verein Deutscher Ingenieure 77, 318–320, (1933)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fortin, F.-A., De Rainville, F.-M., Gardner, M.-A., Parizeau, M., Gagn, C.: DEAP: Evolutionary Algorithms Made Easy. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 2171–2175, (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goniva, C., Kloss, C., Deen, N., Kuipers, J., Pirker, S.: Influence of Rolling Friction Modelling on Single Spout Fluidized Bed Simulations. Particuology 5, 582–591, (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kafui, K. D., Thornton, C., Adams, M. J: Reply to comments by Feng and Yu on “Discrete particle-continuum fluid modelling of gas-solid fluidised beds” by Kafui et al. Chemical Engineering Science 59, 719–722, (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou, Z. Y., Kuang, S. B., Chu, K. W., Yu, A. B.: Discrete particle simulation of particle–fluid flow: model formulations and their applicability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 661, 482–510, (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Di Felice, R.: The voidage function for fluid–particle interaction systems. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 20, 153–159, (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hilton, J., Cleary, P. (2009) The Role of Particle Shape in Pneumatic Conveying. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries (CSIRO)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oschmann, T., Vollmari, K., Kruggel-Emden, H., Wirtz, S.: Numerical investigation of the mixing of non-spherical particles in fluidized beds and during pneumatic conveying. Procedia Engineering 102, 976–985, (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hager, A., Kloss, K., Pirker, S., Goniva, C. (2012) Parallel Open Source CFD-DEM for Resolved Particle-Fluid Interaction. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries (CSIRO)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Weimar Institute of Applied Construction ResearchWeimarGermany

Personalised recommendations