Development of a Combined Euler-Euler Euler-Lagrange Slurry Model

  • Alasdair MackenzieEmail author
  • M. T. Stickland
  • W. M. Dempster


There has been a significant amount of work on modelling erosion caused by slurries, however, these studies are normally focused on low concentrations. The reason for this is usually that dense slurries are too computationally expensive to model in the Euler-Lagrange frame. This presentation suggests a novel solution for reducing computational effort using OpenFOAM to combine two solvers. The two phases of the bulk flow are modelled, partially in the Eulerian-Eulerian reference frame, and partially in the Eulerian-Lagrangian frame. The method aims to increase computational efficiency, but still keep the necessary particle impact data at the wall required for erosion modelling. The new model consists of splitting the domain into two regions and using patch interpolation to couple them together. The particles are then injected into the second region by using the values of the second Eulerian phase from the first region. The values of the second Eulerian phase are written at every time step to a lookupTable, enabling the solver to be used in conjunction with geometry changes, etc., as in Lopez’s work (Lopez in LPT for erosion modelling in OpenFOAM 2014, [1]). If the process can be validated, it provides a promising step towards modelling dense slurry erosion.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Hao Zhang, Yuanqiang Tan, Dongmin Yang, Francesc Xavier Trias, Shengqiang Jiang, Yong Sheng, and Assensi Oliva. Numerical investigation of the location of maximum erosive wear damage in elbow: Effect of slurry velocity, bend orientation and angle of elbow. Powder Technology, 217:467–476, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chong Y. Wong, Christopher Solnordal, Anthony Swallow, Steven Wang, Lachlan Graham, and Jie Wu. Predicting the material loss around a hole due to sand erosion. Wear, 276-277:1–15, February 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.R. Kaushal, T. Thinglas, Yuji Tomita, Shigeru Kuchii, and Hiroshi Tsukamoto. CFD modeling for pipeline flow of fine particles at high concentration. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 43:85–100, July 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L J W Graham, D Lester, and J Wu. SLURRY EROSION IN COMPLEX FLOWS : EXPERIMENT AND CFD. (December):1–6, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    a. Mansouri, H. Arabnejad, S.a. Shirazi, and B.S. McLaury. A combined CFD/experimental methodology for erosion prediction. Wear, 332-333:1090–1097, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amir Mansouri, Hadi Arabnejad, Soroor Karimi, Siamack A. Shirazi, and Brenton S. McLaury. Improved CFD modeling and validation of erosion damage due to fine sand particles. Wear, 338-339:339–350, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gianandrea Vittorio Messa, Giacomo Ferrarese, and Stefano Malavasi. A mixed Euler-Euler/Euler-Lagrange approach to erosion prediction. Wear, 342-343:138–153, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elke Deux and Martin Sommerfeld. MODELING OF TURBULENT ATOMIZATION COMBINING A TWO-FLUID AND A STRUCTURE FUNCTION APPROACH Elke Deux and Martin Sommerfeld. 16, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oscar J. Soriano-Palao, Martin Sommerfeld, and Axel Burkhardt. Modelling the influence of the nozzle geometry on the primary breakup of diesel jets. International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics, 6(2):113–146, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasmus Gjesing, Jesper Hattel, and Udo Fritsching. Coupled Atomization and Spray Modelling in the Spray Forming Process using Open Foam. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 3(4):471–486, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H Yu, L Goldsworthy, M Ghiji, P A Brandner, and V Garaniya. A parallel Volume of Fluid-Lagrangian Parcel Tracking coupling procedure for diesel spray modelling. 150:46–65, 2017.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    a. Gnanavelu, N. Kapur, a. Neville, and J.F. Flores. An integrated methodology for predicting material wear rates due to erosion. Wear, 267(11):1935–1944, October 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    a. Gnanavelu, N. Kapur, a. Neville, J.F. Flores, and N. Ghorbani. A numerical investigation of a geometry independent integrated method to predict erosion rates in slurry erosion. Wear, 271(5-6):712–719, June 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A Mansouri, S A Shirazi, and B S Mclaury. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of viscosity and particle size on erosion damage caused by solid particles. ASME, pages 1–10, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alasdair Mackenzie, Alejandro Lopez, Konstantinos Ritos, Matthew Stickland, William Dempster,. A COMPARISON OF CFD SOFTWAREPACKAGES’ ABILITY TO MODEL A SUBMERGED JET In Eleventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries CSIRO, pages 1–4, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alasdair Mackenzie. A hybrid slurry cfd model:euler-euler to euler-lagrange., 2017.
  18. 18.
    Linmin Li, Baokuan Li, and Zhongqiu Liu. Modeling of spout-fluidized beds and investigation of drag closures using OpenFOAM. Powder Technology, 305:364–376, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alejandro López, William Nicholls, Matthew T. Stickland, and William M. Dempster. CFD study of Jet Impingement Test erosion using Ansys Fluent® and OpenFOAM®. Computer Physics Communications, 197:88–95, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ordinance Factory Estate, National Mineral, Development Corporation, and Uppal Road. CFD STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF NEAR GRAVITY MATERIAL ON DMC TREATING COAL USING DPM AND ASM MULTIPHASE MODEL. (December):1–7, 2015.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roza Tarpagkou and Asterios Pantokratoras. CFD methodology for sedimentation tanks: The effect of secondary phase on fluid phase using DPM coupled calculations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(5):3478–3494, March 2013.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Halima Hadžiahmetović, Nedim Hodžić, Damir Kahrimanović, and Ejub Džaferović. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ( CFD ) BASED EROSION PREDICTION MODEL IN ELBOWS. 3651:275–282, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amir Mansouri, Hadi Arabnejad Khanouki, Siamack A Shirazi, and Brenton S Mclaury. PARTICLE TRACKING VELOCIMETRY (PTV) MEASUREMENT OF ABRASIVE MICROPARTICLE IMPACT SPEED AND ANGLE IN BOTH AIR-SAND AND SLURRY EROSION TESTERS. Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, pages 1–9, 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jukai Chen, Yueshe Wang, Xiufeng Li, Renyang He, Shuang Han, and Yanlin Chen. Erosion prediction of liquid-particle two-phase flow in pipeline elbows via CFDDEM coupling method. Powder Technology, 275:182–187, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wojciech P. Adamczyk, PaweKozoub, Gabriel Wcel, Adam Klimanek, Ryszard a. Biaecki, and Tomasz Czakiert. Modeling oxy-fuel combustion in a 3D circulating fluidized bed using the hybrid Euler-Lagrange approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 71(1):266–275, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P.Thummala Phanindra. Description of reactingtwophaseeulerfoam solver with a focus on mass transfer modeling terms., 2017.
  27. 27.
    V.H. Bhusare, M.K. Dhiman, D.V. Kalaga, S. Roy, and J.B. Joshi. CFD simulations of a bubble column with and without internals by using openfoam. Chemical Engineering Journal, 317:157 – 174, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alasdair Mackenzie, MT Stickland, WM Dempster. A Combined Euler-Euler Euler-Lagrange Slurry Model. In Eleventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries CSIRO, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alasdair Mackenzie
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. T. Stickland
    • 2
  • W. M. Dempster
    • 2
  1. 1.Weir Advanced Research CentreUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DepartmentUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations