Advertisement

OpenFOAM® pp 509-520 | Cite as

Use of OpenFOAM® for the Investigation of Mixing Time in Agitated Vessels with Immersed Helical Coils

  • Alexander Stefan
  • Heyko Juergen SchultzEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter deals with the investigation of potentials in energy efficiency optimization for widespread agitated vessels. A lab-scale model is derived from an industrially used reactor vessel with immersed helical coils, which is utilized for several chemical basis operations. The model is analyzed with particle image velocimetry (PIV) and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) concerning velocity and concentration fields, which gives a good validation basis for CFD analysis. However, it is challenging to validate simulations of industrial reactors. In this work, the idea is pursued of comparing the flow fields of simulations and measurements in order to validate the computational results. The simulation task implies the generation of complex geometry meshes, solving for steady-state, as well as for transient solutions, and seeking fast and effective methods. An approach to the validation of technical, large-scale simulation results is proposed through comparison of mixing times in simulations and industrial trial runs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all those involved in the organization of OFW11 and all the contributors who have enriched this event. This project upon which this chapter is based is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research under the project number: 03FH020PX4. Responsibility for the contents of this publication rests with the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    OpenCFD Ltd (2004–2016) OpenFOAM®. http://openfoam.com. Accessed 30 Sep 2016
  2. 2.
    Jasak H (2009), OpenFOAM®: Open source CFD in research and industry. Inter J Nav Archit Oc Engng 1:89–94.  https://doi.org/10.2478/ijnaoe-2013-0011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zlokarnik M (1999), Ruehrtechnik: Theorie und Praxis. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraume M (2003), Mischen und Ruehren. WILEY-VCH WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekato Holding GmbH (2012), Ekato. The Book. Ekato, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oldshue JY (1983), Fluid Mixing Technology. Chemical engineering McGraw-Hill Pub. Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM (eds) (2004), Handbook of Industrial Mixing. WILEY-INTERSCIENCE, Hoboken, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paschedag AR (2004), CFD in der Verfahrenstechnik. WILEY-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tatterson GB (2003), Fluid mixing and gas dispersion in agitated tanks. Gary TattersonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lohse R (2008), Simplified Calculation of Mixing and Suspending Processes in Agitated Vessels, Chem. Eng. Technol. 31(12):1799–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Platzer B (1988), Modeling of the Local Destributions of Velocity Components and Turbulence Parameters in Agitated Vessels – Method and Results. Chem. Eng. Process 23:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaehrling K, Wolinski S, Ulbricht M, Schultz HJ (2016), Vergleich von Tubebaffles und Rohrschlangen in Bezug auf thermische und mechanische Energieeintragung in Ruehrreaktoren. Chem. Ing. Tech. 88(9):1224.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201650211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stefan A, Wuenscher P, Schultz HJ, Ulbricht M (2016), Untersuchung der Gasdichteverteilung in begasten Ruehrkesseln mit eintauchenden Rohrschlangen. Chem. Ing. Tech. 88(9):1385–1386.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201650341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schultz HJ, Matzke M, Kessel C, Jaehrling K, Stefan A, Bliem V (2016), Experimente und gekoppelte CFD‐Simulationen von Wärmeübergängen an Rohrschlangen in Fermentern und Rührreaktoren. Chem. Ing. Tech. 88(9):1380.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201650216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bliem V, Schultz HJ (2014), Investigation of Horizontal Velocity Fields in Stirred Vessels with Helical Coils by PIV. International Journal of Chemical Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/763473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bliem V (2016), Untersuchung des Einflusses der Stroemungsverhaeltnisse auf den Waermeuebergang in Ruehrreaktoren mit Rohrschlangeneinbauten mittels PIV/LIF. Dissertation, University of Duisburg-EssenGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stefan A, Hindges S, Schultz HJ (2016), Simulation of the Heat Exchange in Vessels with Helical Coils and the Influence of Stirrer Position. Chem. Ing. Tech. 89(4):470-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201600146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirtsiefer M (2015), Investigation of Heat Transfer and Mixing Characteristics of Helical Coils in Stirred Tank Reactors by Laser-induced Fluorescence. Master Thesis, University of Applied Sciences NiederrheinGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    11th OpenFOAM® Workshop (2016) Training Courses. openfoamworkshop.com. Accessed 30 Sep 2016Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maric T, Hoepken J, Mooney K (2014), The OpenFOAM® Technology Primer. SourcefluxGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferzinger JH, Peric M (2002), Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of Applied Sciences NiederrheinKrefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations