Advertisement

OpenFOAM® pp 419-435 | Cite as

Simulation of a Moving-Bed Reactor and a Fluidized-Bed Reactor by DPM and MPPIC in OpenFOAM®

  • Kwonwoo Jang
  • Woojoo Han
  • Kang Y. HuhEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Simulations are performed for a moving-bed reactor in a rotary kiln and a fluidized-bed reactor in a FINEX plant. The DEM (Discrete Element Method) and the MPPIC (Multiphase Particle-In-Cell) methods are combined with a compressible reacting flow in OpenFOAM® 2.3.x. The computational load is reduced by the DPM (Discrete Particle Method), in which a computational parcel represents a fixed number of identical particles in the DEM. The slumping and rolling modes are reproduced by adjusting particle–particle and particle–wall friction coefficients to match the regime map in Henein et al. [1]. Validation is performed in a pilot-scale rotary kiln for reduction of iron ore with heat input from LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas). Simulation results in a lab-scale reactor are validated against those by commercial software and experimental data for the fluidized-bed reactor. Simulation results show good agreement with actual operating data for an industrial-scale fluidized-bed reactor in the FINEX process. Reasonable trends are reproduced for the bed burners and the collective motion of particles of different diameters in the FINEX plant.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Henein, J.K. Brimacombe, A.P. Watkinson (1983) The modeling of transverse solids motion in rotary kilns. Metall Trans B 14 (2):207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Trambouze, J.-P. Euzen (2004) Chemical Reactors: From Design to Operation. Technip, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.A. Cundall, O.D. Strack (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29 (1):47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Tsuji, T. Kawaguchi, T. Tanaka (1993) Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technol 77 (1):79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Tsuji (2007) Multi-scale modeling of dense phase gas–particle flow. Chem Eng Sci 62(13):3410–3418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dalibor. Jajcevic, Eva Siegmann, Charles Radeke et al (2013) Large-scale CFD-DEM simulations of fluidized granular systems. Chem Eng Sci 98(19):298–310.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. J. Anderews, P.J. O’Rourke (1996) The multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) method for dense particulate flows. Int J Multiphase Flow 22(2):379–402.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sreekanth Pannala, Madhava Syamlal, Thomas J. O’Brien (2010) Computational gas-solids flows and reacting system: Theory, Methods and Practice. IGI Global, New York.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stefan Luding (2008) Introduction to discrete element methods: basic of contact force models and how to perform the micro-macro transition to continuum theory. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 12:785–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Y. Wen, Y. H. Yu (1966) A generalized method for predicting the minimum fluidization velocity, Chem. Eng. AIChE J 12(3):610–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mikio Sakai, Yoshinori Yamada, Yusuke Shigeto et al (2010) Large-scale discrete element modeling in a fluidized bed. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1319–1335.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F.A. Williams (1985) Combustion Theory, 2nd edition. The Benjamin/Cumming Publishing, California.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. E. Harris, D. G. Crighton (1994) Solitons, solitary waves, and voidage disturbances in gas-fulidized beds. J Fluid Mech 266:243–276.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. M. Aureais, R. Jackson, W. B. Russel (1988) The solution of shocks and the effects of compressible sediments in transient settling. J Fluid Mech 195:437–462.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. M. Snider (2001) An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell method for dense particle flows. J Comput Phys 170(2):523–549.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Peters (2000) Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Watanabe, M. Otaka (2006) Numerical simulation of coal gasification in entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel 85:1935–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    John R. Howell, Pinar Menguc, Robert Siegel (2015) Thermal radiation heat transfer, 6th edition. CRC press, Florida.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Henein, J.K. Brimacombe, A.P. Watkinson (1983) Experimental study of transverse bed motion in rotary kilns. Metall Trans B 14 (2):191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Tsuji (2012) Behavior of reduction and growth of metal in Smelting of Saprolite Ni-ore in a Rotary Kiln for Production of Ferro-nickel Alloy. ISIJ Int 52 (6):1000–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    CFDEM (2016) CFEDM Benchmarks. http://www.cfdem.com/cfdem-benchmarks.
  22. 22.
    ANSYS. ANSYS FLUENT User’s Guide. ANSYS Inc., Cannonsburg, PA, 2012.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M.J.V. Goldschmidt, R. Beetstra, J.A.M. Kuipers (2004) Hydrodynamic modelling of dense gas-fluidised beds: comparison and validation of 3D discrete particle and continuum models. Powder Technol 142:23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. S. Lin, M. M. Chen, B. T. Chao (1985) A novel radioactive particle tracking facility for measurement of solids motion in gas fluidized beds. AIChE J 31(3):465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. R. Muller, S. A. Scott, D. J. Holland et al. (2009) Validation of a discrete element model using magnetic resonance measurements. Particuology 7(4):297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    POSCO (2014) Technological Advance of the FINEX® Ironmaking Process. Paper presented at Asian Pellets and DRI Conference, Zurich Marriott Hotel, Singapore, 8–9 July 2014.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. Kunii, O. Levenspiel (1991) Fluidization Engineering, 2nd edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPohang University of Science and TechnologyPohangRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations