Advertisement

OpenFOAM® pp 325-340 | Cite as

Modeling of Turbulent Flows in Rectangular Ducts Using OpenFOAM®

  • Raquel FariaEmail author
  • Almerindo D. Ferreira
  • A. M. G. Lopes
  • Antonio C. M. Sousa
Chapter

Abstract

The present work aims to verify the applicability of Irwin probes and Preston tubes to turbulent incompressible flow in smooth rectangular ducts. For the experimental apparatus, an aspect ratio of 1:2 is considered and tests are conducted for Reynolds number values within the range of 104 to 9 × 104. Local friction coefficients are determined based on the pressure measurements obtained using pressure taps and a Preston tube. A linear relation is established between the local wall shear stress \( (\tau_{{w_{x} }} ) \) and the pressure difference \( {(\Delta }p_{I} ) \) measured with the Irwin probes. The numerical simulations implemented in the open source OpenFOAM® 2.4.0 CFD toolbox are benchmarked against ANSYS CFX results, and the two sets are compared against the experimental results. A viscous sub-layer formulation was used, with y+ ≈ 1 for the mesh. Although the focus of the present study is to investigate constant section ducts, some preliminary results for variable section ducts are also presented. Two representative cases—convergent with 1° slope (C1) and divergent with 1° slope (D1)—were selected. The Preston tube measurements are in good agreement with the numerical results and within the expected accuracy of the experimental results obtained under adverse pressure gradient conditions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge all those involved in the organization of OFW11 and all the contributors who made this event a very stimulating one. The authors are also indebted for the experimental facilities made available by ADAI (Association for the Development of Industrial Aerodynamics).

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed S, Brundrett E (1971) Turbulent flow in non-circular ducts. Part 1. Int J Heat Mass Transf 14:365–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(71)90156-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bechert DW (1996) Calibration of Preston tubes. AIAA J 34:205–206.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.13048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duan Z, Yovanovich MM, Muzychka YS (2012) Pressure Drop for Fully Developed Turbulent Flow in Circular and Noncircular Ducts. ASME J Fluids Eng 134:61201.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faria R, Ferreira AD, Lopes AMG, Sousa ACM (2016) On the use of Irwin probes to measure wall shear stress in rectangular ducts of constant section. CYTEF2016 - Proc - Adv Refrig Sci Technol - VIII 9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartnett JP, Koh JCY, McComas ST (1962) A Comparison of Predicted and Measured Friction Factors for Turbulent Flow Through Rectangular Ducts. J Heat Transfer 84:82.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3684299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He S, Gotts JA (2005) Calculation of Friction Coefficients for Noncircular Channels. ASME J Fluids Eng 126:1033–1038.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1845479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Irwin HPAH (1981) A simple omnidirectional sensor for wind-tunnel studies of pedestrian-level winds. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 7:219–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(81)90051-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Melling A, Whitelaw JH (1976) Turbulent flow in a rectangular duct. J Fluid Mech 78:289.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112076002450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Menter FR, Esch T (2001) Elements of Industrial Heat Transfer Predictions. 16th Brazilian Congr Mech Eng 117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004.
  11. 11.
    OpenFOAM® (2015) The Open Source CFD Toolbox. User Guide Version 3.0.1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel VC (1965) Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 23:185.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112065001301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peysson Y, Ouriemi M, Medale M, Aussillous P, Guazzelli É (2009) Threshold for sediment erosion in pipe flow. Int J Multiph Flow 35:597–600.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.02.007.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Preston JH (1954) The Determination of Turbulent Skin Friction by Means of Pitot Tubes. J R Aeronaut Soc 58:109–121.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0368393100097704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rochlitz H, Scholz P, Fuchs T (2015) The flow field in a high aspect ratio cooling duct with and without one heated wall. Exp Fluids 56:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2071-y.
  16. 16.
    Rokni M, Olsson C, Sundén B (1998) Numerical and experimental investigation of turbulent flow in a rectangular duct. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 28:225–242.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19980815)28:2%3c225::aid-fld710%3e3.3.co;2-k.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yao J, Zhao Y, Fairweather M (2015) Numerical simulation of turbulent flow through a straight square duct. Appl Therm Eng 91:800–811.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raquel Faria
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Almerindo D. Ferreira
    • 2
  • A. M. G. Lopes
    • 2
  • Antonio C. M. Sousa
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering—Rua Pedro Nunes—Quinta da NoraPolytechnic Institute of Coimbra, ISECCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringADAI-LAETA, University of Coimbra—Polo IICoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations