Advertisement

OpenFOAM® pp 211-221 | Cite as

GEN-FOAM: An OpenFOAM®-Based Multi-physics Solver for Nuclear Reactor Analysis

  • Carlo FiorinaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

A multi-physics solver for nuclear reactor analysis, named GeN-Foam (Generalized Nuclear Foam), has been developed by the Laboratory for Reactor Physics and System Behavior at the EPFL and at the Paul Scherrer Institut (Switzerland). The developed solver couples: a multigroup neutron diffusion or SP3 sub-solver; a thermal-hydraulics sub-solver based on the standard k-ε turbulence model, but extended to coarse-mesh applications through the use of a porous medium approach for user-selected cell zones; a displacement-based thermal-mechanics sub-solver to evaluate thermal deformations of structures; and a finite-difference subscale fuel model that can be used in coarse-mesh simulations of the core to evaluate the local temperature profile in fuel and cladding. A first-order implicit Euler scheme with an adaptive time step is used for time integration, and the coupling between equations is semi-implicit, using the Picard iteration. Three different meshes are used for thermal-hydraulics, thermal-mechanics and neutron diffusion, and fields are projected between different meshes through a standard volume-averaging technique. GeN-Foam features a general applicability to pin- or plate-fuel, or homogeneous nuclear reactors. Its application in several cases of interest has shown stable numerical behavior, the possibility of obtaining reliable results for traditional reactor types, as well as the possibility of investigating non-conventional reactors, whose analysis cannot be easily carried out using nuclear legacy codes.

References

  1. 1.
    Bao J (2016) Development of the model for the multi-physics analysis of Molten Salt Reactor Experiment using GeN-Foam code. Master Thesis, Paul Scherrer Institut, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bestion D (2008) System Code Models and Capabilities, In: THICKET 2008, Pisa, Italy, May 5–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CASL, Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (2011) A Project Summary, CASL-2010-0022-001-P. U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Energy. www.casl.gov (Published: 07/18/2011).
  4. 4.
    Clifford I (2013) A hybrid coarse and fine mesh solution method for prismatic high temperature gas-cooled reactor thermal-fluid analysis. PhD Thesis. PennState, US.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Fiorina C, Mikityuk K. (2015a) Application of the new GeN-Foam multi-physics solver to the European Sodium Fast Reactor and verification against available codes, In: proceedings of the ICAPP 2015 Conference, Nice, France, May 03–06.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fiorina C, Clifford I D, Aufiero M, Mikityuk K (2015b) GeN-Foam: a novel OpenFOAM® based multi-physics solver for 2D/3D transient analysis of nuclear reactors, Nuclear Engineering and Design 294:24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiorina C, Kerkar N, Mikityuk K, Pautz A (2016) Development and verification of the neutron diffusion solver for the GeN-Foam multi-physics platform, Annals of Nuclear Energy 96:212–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiorina C, Pautz A (2016) Status and ongoing developments for the GeN-Foam multi-physics solver, In: proceedings of the 2016 ANS Winter meeting, November 6–10, Las Vegas, US.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fiorina C, Hursin M, Pautz A (2017) Extension of the GeN-Foam neutronic solver to SP3 analysis and application to the CROCUS experimental reactor, Annals of Nuclear Energy 101:419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaston D, Newman C, Hansen G, Lebrun-Grandié D (2009) MOOSE: A parallel computational framework for coupled systems of nonlinear equations, Nuclear Engineering and Design 239:1768–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    NURESAFE, NUclear REactor SAFEty Simulation Platform (2013). Project presentation. http://www.nuresafe.eu/.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Radman S, Fiorina C, Pautz A (2017) Investigation of partial coolant flow blockage in a Sodium Fast Reactor assembly with coarse-mesh methodologies, In: NENE 2017, September 11–14, Bled, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saurel R, Abgrall R (1999) A Multiphase Godunov Method for Compressible Multifluid and Multiphase Flows, Journal of Computational Physics 150:425–467.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stacey W M (2007) Nuclear Reactor Physics. WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmbh & Co. KGaA.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vafai K, (2005) Handbook of Porous Media, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, LRSLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations