Advertisement

Added Mass Partitioned Fluid–Structure Interaction Solver Based on a Robin Boundary Condition for Pressure

  • Željko TukovićEmail author
  • Martina Bukač
  • Philip Cardiff
  • Hrvoje Jasak
  • Alojz Ivanković
Chapter

Abstract

This paper describes a self-contained, partitioned fluid–structure interaction solver based on a finite volume discretisation. The incompressible fluid flow is described by the Navier–Stokes equations in the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian form and the solid deformation is described by the St. Venant-Kirchhoff hyperelastic model in the total Lagrangian form. Both fluid and solid are discretised in space using the second-order accurate cell-centred finite volume method, and temporal discretisation is performed using the first-order accurate implicit Euler scheme. Coupling between fluid and solid is performed using a Robin-Neumann partitioned procedure based on a new Robin boundary condition for pressure. The solver has been tested on the wave propagation in an elastic tube test case characterised by a low solid-to-fluid density ratio. The first-order temporal accuracy is shown and the stability of the method is demonstrated for both the strongly coupled and loosely coupled versions of the solution procedure. It is also shown that the proposed methodology can efficiently handle FSI cases in which the fluid domain is entirely enclosed by Dirichlet boundary conditions, even for the case of geometrically nonlinear elastic deformation.

References

  1. 1.
    Küttler, U., Wall, W.A.: Fixed–point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation. Computational mechanics 43(1), 61–72 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Degroote, J., Bathe, K.J., Vierendeels, J.: Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid–structure interaction. Computers and structures 87, 793–801 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bukač, M., Čanić, S., Glowinski, R., Tambača, J., Quaini, A.: Fluid-structure interaction in blood flow capturing non-zero longitudinal structure displacement. Journal of Computational Physics 235, 515–541 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guidoboni, G., Glowinski, R., Cavallini, N., Čanić, S.: Stable loosely-coupled-type algorithm for fluid-structure interaction in blood flow. Journal of Computational Physics 228(18), 6916–6937 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banks, J., Henshaw, W., Schwendeman, D.: An analysis of a new stable partitioned algorithm for fsi problems. part i: Incompressible flow and elastic solids. Journal of Computational Physics 269, 108–137 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demirdžić, I., Perić, M.: Space conservation law in finite volume calculations of fluid flow. International journal for numerical methods in fluids 8(9), 1037–1050 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas, P.D., Lombard, C.K.: Geometric conservation law and its application to flow computations on movining grids. AIAA Journal 17, 1030–1037 (1979)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jasak, H., Weller, H.G.: Application of the finite volume method and unstructured meshes to linear elasticity. International journal for numerical methods in engineering 48(2), 267–287 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Batchelor, F.R.: An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1967)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Causin, P., Gerbeau, J., Nobile, F.: Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid?structure problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 194((42-44)), 4506–4527 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Čanić, S., Muha, B., Bukač, M.: Stability of the kinematically coupled \(\beta \)-scheme for fluid-structure interaction problems in hemodynamics. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling 12(1), 54–80 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferziger, J.H., Perić, M.: Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer Verlag, Berlin-New York (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rhie, C.M., Chow, W.L.: A numerical study of the turbulent flow past an isolated airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA Journal 21, 1525–1532 (1983)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuković, Ž., Jasak, H.: A moving mesh finite volume interface tracking method for surface tension dominated interfacial fluid flow. Computers and fluids 55, 70–84 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gillebaart, T., Blom, D.S., van Zuijlen, A.H., Bijl, H.: Time consistent fluid structure interaction on collocated grids for incompressible flow. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 298(0), 159–182 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jasak, H., Tuković, Ž.: Automatic mesh motion for the unstructured finite volume method. Transactions of FAMENA 30(2), 1–20 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Issa, R.I.: Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. Journal of computational physics 62(1), 40–65 (1986)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacobs, D.A.H.: Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient methods for solving systems of algebraic equations. Tech. Rep. RD/L/N193/80, Central Electricity Research Laporatories (1980)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kershaw, D.: The incomplete cholesky-conjugate gradient method for the iterative solution of systems of linear equations. Journal of Computational Physics 26(1), 43–65 (1978)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kanyanta, V., Ivankovic, A., Karac, A.: Validation of a fluid-structure interaction numerical model for predicting flow transients in arteries. Journal of Biomechanics 42(11), 1705–1712 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wylie, E.B., Streeter, V.L.: Fluid Transients in Systems. Englewood Cliffs, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roache, P.J.: Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 29, 123–160 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Küttler, U., Förster, C., Wall, W.A.: A solution for the incompressibility dilemma in partitioned fluid–structure interaction with pure dirichlet fluid domains. Computational mechanics 38, 417–429 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Badia, S., Nobile, F., Vergara, C.: Robin-robin preconditioned krylov methods for fluid-structure interaction problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 198, 2768–2784 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Željko Tuković
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martina Bukač
    • 2
  • Philip Cardiff
    • 3
  • Hrvoje Jasak
    • 1
  • Alojz Ivanković
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of Notre DameSouth BendUSA
  3. 3.School of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringUniversity College Dubin, Bekaert University Technology CentreDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations