Advertisement

The Role of the United States’ Quasi-Alliances in Asia: Shadow Puppetry or Hard Alliances?

  • Charmaine G. Misalucha-Willoughby
Chapter

Abstract

How are alliances maintained? To answer this question, linguistic tools like representational force recognize the power differentials of states and trace how members end up acquiescing with the demands of other powers. This framework can be applied to the US’ alliances in Asia. In the face of crises, alliances deploy representational force in order to stabilize their relationship. In the short term, this takes precedence over addressing the actual threat. The US-Japan alliance faced a crisis during the War on Terror, while the US-Philippine alliance faces a crisis in the South China Sea. Here, representational force was used to stabilize the alliance. Doing so was necessary for both sides to attain convergence and address the crisis at large.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Fulbright Program and the Japan Foundation for the United States-ASEAN Fellowship (2013) and the Japanese Studies Fellowship (2014) that made data gathering for this project possible.

References

  1. Agence France-Presse. 2016. Duterte on Killings: Corrupt Journalists Asked for It. Rappler. Available at http://www.rappler.com/nation/134921-duterte-endorses-killing-corrupt-journalists. Accessed 23 Aug 2016.
  2. Amador, J. III. 2013. The Philippines’ Security Cooperation with the United States and Japan. Asia Pacific Bulletin 227. Available at http://www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/private/apb227.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2013.
  3. Amador, J., and K.M. Pabeliña. 2014. PH-US Security Relations: Deepening the Alliance. Rappler. Available at http://www.rappler.com/thought-leaders/56518-ph-us-enhanced-defense-cooperation-agreement. Accessed 19 Sept 2014.
  4. Bisley, N. 2008. Security the “Anchor of Regional Stability”? The Transformation of the US-Japan Alliance and East Asian Security. Contemporary Southeast Asia 30 (1): 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bitzinger, R.A. 2012. Will the US Pivot Trigger a New Regional Arms Race? Global Asia 7 (4): 34–37.Google Scholar
  6. Chalk, P. 2014. Rebuilding While Performing: Military Modernisation in the Philippines. Australian Strategic Policy Institute Special Report, Canberra.Google Scholar
  7. Clinton, H. 2011. America’s Pacific Century. Foreign Policy. Available at http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century. Accessed 28 Mar 2013.
  8. Cronin, P.M. 2012. As the World Rebalances in the Asian-Pacific Century, So Must the United States. Global Asia 7 (4): 8–13.Google Scholar
  9. De Castro, R.C. 2009. The US-Philippine Alliance: An Evolving Hedge Against an Emerging China Challenge. Contemporary Southeast Asia 31 (3): 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2010. Engaging Both the Eagle and the Dragon: The Philippines’ Precarious and Futile Attempt in Equi-Balancing. Pacific Focus 35 (3): 356–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2012. The Philippines in 2011: Muddling Through a Year of Learning and Adjustment. Asian Survey 52 (1): 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2014. Philippine Strategic Culture: Continuity in the Face of Changing Regional Dynamics. Contemporary Security Policy 35 (2): 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Domonoske, Camila. 2016. Under New Philippine President, Nearly 1800 Have Died in Extrajudicial Killings. NPR. Available at http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/08/22/490944191/under-new-philippine-president-nearly-1-800-have-died-in-extrajudicial-killings. Accessed 23 Aug 2016.
  14. Hughes, C. 2004a. Japan’s Re-emergence as a “Normal” Military Power. Adelphi Papers 368.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2004b. Japan’s Security Policy, the US-Japan Alliance, and the “War on Terror”: Incrementalism Confirmed or Radical Leap? Australian Journal of International Affairs 58 (4): 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ito, G. 2004. Leadership in Bandwagon: A Historical Sketch of Japan’s Security Policy. Policy and Society 23 (1): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Katzenstein, P.J. 2003. Same War-Different Views: Germany, Japan, and Counterterrorism. International Organization 57: 731–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mattern, J.B. 2001. The Power Politics of Identity. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 349–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2005. Why “Soft Power” Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 583–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDevitt, M. 2012. America’s New Security Strategy Dimension and Its Military Dimension. Global Asia 7 (4): 14–17.Google Scholar
  21. Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  22. Midford, P. 2003. Japan’s Response to Terror: Dispatching the SDF to the Arabian Sea. Asian Survey 43 (2): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Permanent Court of Arbitration. 2016. Press Release: The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China). Available at https://pca-cpa.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/175/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Press-Release-No-11-English.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2016.
  24. Prime Minister’s Office. 2001a. State at Press Conference. Available at http://japan.kantei.go.jp/koizumispeech/2001/0912kaiken_e.html. Accessed 27 May 2014.
  25. ———. 2001b. Opening Statement at Press Conference. Available at http://japan.kantei.go.jp/koizumispeech/2001/0919sourikaiken_e.html Accessed 27 May 2014.
  26. Raine, S., and C. Le Mière. 2013. Regional Order: The South China Sea Disputes. Adelphi Series. UK.Google Scholar
  27. Ranada, Pia. 2016. Duterte to Offer P3 Million Bounty for Drug Lords. Rappler. Available at http://www.rappler.com/nation/134924-duterte-bounty-drug-lords. Accessed 23 Aug 2016.
  28. Simon, S.W. 2012. Conflict and Diplomacy in the South China Sea: The View from Washington. Asian Survey 52 (5): 995–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2014. US-Southeast Asia Relations: Enhancing the Rebalance. Comparative Connections. Available at http://csis.org/files/publication/1402qus_seasia.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2014.
  30. Snyder, G.H. 1984. The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics. World Politics 36 (4): 461–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 1997. Alliance Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Thayer, C.A. 2013. U.S. Rebalancing: What Regional Support? Thayer Consultancy Background Brief. Available at http://www.scribd.com/doc/152363766/Thayer-U-S-Rebalancing-What-Regional-Support. Accessed 25 Aug 2013.
  33. United Nations. 2016. UN Rights Experts Urge Philippines to End Wave of Extrajudicial Killings Amid Major Drug Crackdown. UN News Centre. Available at http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=54707#.V7ueDWCKTIV. Accessed 23 Aug 2016.
  34. United States Embassy in the Philippines. 2016. Press Release. Available at https://ph.usembassy.gov/u-s-embassy-statement/. Accessed 23 Aug 2016.
  35. Walt, S.M. 1985. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security 9 (4): 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. White House. 2011. Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charmaine G. Misalucha-Willoughby
    • 1
  1. 1.International Studies DepartmentDe La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations