International Security in the Asia-Pacific: Transcending ASEAN Towards Transitional Polycentrism—An Introduction

  • Alan Chong


Transitional polycentrism is intrinsically awkward as a description of the security of states and their populations. It implies the loosening of state control and the emergence of newly asserted authority by mixed constellations of intergovernmental organizations and non-state actors. It could also imply a competition of agendas between threats to the integrity of borders and the amorphous range of human security threats such as natural disasters, airliner crashes, displacement by man-made pollution, and food scarcity. More conventionally, it could also refer to the decline of ASEAN (the Association of Southeast Asian Nations) as the collective security actor that once enjoyed primacy as the lowest common denominator reference for the great powers in Asia to establish community with the weaker states of the region. Conversely, polycentrism could equally imply a return to a more neo-realist-oriented international order where great powers ignore ASEAN and steer regional order according to their perceived interests and relative military superiority. This chapter introduces the book that embraces these contradictory trends and concludes that the onus is on ASEAN to get its diplomatic act together, while the great powers demonstrate the possibilities of self-restraint amongst themselves. Meanwhile, the advent of human security agendas will compel states to align national security with wider universalist frames of loyalty with all the attendant political discomfort in justifying such agendas at home.


  1. Acharya, A. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2009. Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ba, A.D. 2009. (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, E. 2014. Much to Gain as Xi Makes Trip to India. International New York Times, September 18, p. 3.Google Scholar
  5. Bendini, R. 2015. In Depth Analysis: Japan Foreign and Security Policy at a Crossroads, DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2015_251. European Parliament. Directorate-General for External Policies, Policy Department. Available at: Accessed 17 Dec 2015.
  6. Buzan, B. 1988. The Southeast Asian Security Complex. Contemporary Southeast Asia 10 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2003. Security Architecture in Asia: The Interplay of Regional and Global Levels. The Pacific Review 16 (2): 143–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buzan, B., and Y. Zhang. 2014. Contesting International Society in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chong, A. 2011. A Society of the Weak, the Medium and the Great: Southeast Asia’s Lessons in Building Soft Community Among States. In The Great Power (Mis)Management: The Russian-Georgian War and Its Implications for Global Political Order, ed. A. Astrov, 135–158. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Colbert, E.S. 1977. Southeast Asia in International Politics, 1941–1956. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, A. 2003. Security and Southeast Asia: Domestic, Regional, and Global Issues. Singapore: ISEAS Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2013. Building a People-Oriented Security Community the ASEAN Way. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Cottey, A., and A. Forster. 2004. Reshaping Defence Diplomacy: New Roles for Military Cooperation and Assistance, 84. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Douglas, J. 2015. How the Rest of Asia Reacted to US Navy Patrol Near China’s Man-Made Island. The Diplomat. Available at: Accessed 29 Dec. 2015.
  15. Dyer, G. 2016. US to call for diplomatic solutions in region. Financial Times (UK), July 13, p. 3.Google Scholar
  16. Emmers, R. 2012. ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Emmers, R., and S.S. Tan. 2011. The ASEAN Regional Forum and Preventive Diplomacy: Built to Fail? Asian Security 7 (1): 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fackler, M. 2015. Japan-China Rivalry Playing Out in Skies. International New York Times, March 10, p. 1, 4.Google Scholar
  19. Foot, R., and A. Walter. 2010. China, the United States, and Global Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gill, B. 2005. China’s Evolving Regional Security Strategy. In Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, ed. D.L. Shambaugh, 247–265. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Godement, F. 2003. Escaping the Merchant/Missionary Dilemma: An Imperial Policy for the Asia-Pacific. The Pacific Review 16 (2): 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goh, E. 2008. Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies. International Security 32 (3): 113–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hampson, F.O. 2008. Human Security. In Security Studies: An introduction, ed. P.D. Williams, 229–243. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hathaway, R.M., and M. Wills. 2013. Introduction: New Security Challenges for a New Century. In New Security Challenges in Asia, ed. R.M. Hathaway and M. Wills. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, C. 1994. Academic International Relations: The Siren Song of Policy Relevance. In Two Worlds of International Relations: Academics, Practitioners and the Trade in Ideas, ed. C. Hill and P. Beshoff, 3–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hughes, C. 2015. Poor People’s Politics in East Timor. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 908–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huxley, T. 1996. Southeast Asia in the Study of International Relations: The Rise and Decline of a Region. The Pacific Review 9 (2): 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kapoor, K., and J. Edwards. 2015. UPDATE 2-Indonesia’s President Cuts Short U.S. Trip Due to Haze Crisis. Reuters. Available at: Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
  29. Leifer, M. 1989. ASEAN and the Security of Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1999. The ASEAN Peace Process: A Category Mistake. The Pacific Review 12 (1): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lepgold, J. 1998. Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance. Political Science Quarterly 113 (1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mastanduno, M. 2009. The United States: Regional Strategies and Global Commitments. In Security Politics in the Asia-Pacific: A Regional-Global Nexus? ed. W.T. Tow, 67–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miglani, S. 2015. India, U.S., Japan Kick Off Naval Drills Likely to Annoy China. Reuters. Available at: Accessed 23 Dec 2015.
  34. Odgaard, L. 2007. The Balance of Power in Asia-Pacific Security: US-China Policies on Regional Order. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Ramzy, A. 2014. With Oil Rig, China Flexes Its Muscle. International New York Times, August 11, p. 1, 3.Google Scholar
  36. Sa, H., and E.A. Resnick. 2015. Reciprocal Salami-Slicing in East Asia. RSIS Commentary No.275. Available at: Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
  37. Shambaugh, D. 2005. Return to the Middle Kingdom? China and Asia in the Early Twenty First Century. In Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, ed. D.L. Shambaugh, 23–47. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2014. International Relations in Asia: A Multidimensional Analysis. In International Relations of Asia, ed. D.L. Shambaugh and M.B. Yahuda. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Simon, S.W. 1995. Realism and Neoliberalism: International Relations Theory and Southeast Asian Security. The Pacific Review 8 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 1996. Alternative Visions of Security in the Asia Pacific. Pacific Affairs 69 (3): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soesastro, H., C. Joewono, and C.A. Hernandez. 2006. Twenty Two Years of ASEAN ISIS: Origin, Evolution and Challenges of Track Two Diplomacy. Jakarta: ASEAN-ISIS and CSIS.Google Scholar
  42. Stuart-Fox, M. 2010. Southeast Asia and China: The Role of History and Culture in Shaping Future Relations. In China’s International Relations in Asia. Volume IV – East Asia Responds to a Rising China, ed. L. Mingjiang. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Tan, S.S. 2007. The Role of Knowledge Communities in Constructing Asia-Pacific Security: How Thought and Talk Make War and Peace. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2012. Talking Their Walk? The Evolution of Defense Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Asian Security 8 (3): 232–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2013. The Making of the Asia Pacific: Knowledge Brokers and the Politics of Representation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Torode, G. 2012. South China Sea dispute wrecks Asean unity. South China Morning Post. Available at: Accessed 11 Sept 2014.
  47. Tow, W.T. 2001. Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Vuving, A.L. 2010. Strategy and Evolution of Vietnam’s China Policy. In China’s International Relations in Asia. Volume IV – East Asia Responds to a Rising China, ed. L. Mingjiang, 171–189. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Wong, E., and J. Perlez. 2015. China hopes halt to island-building will calm waters. International New York Times, June 18, p. 3.Google Scholar
  50. Yahuda, M. 2005. The Evolving Asian Order: The Accommodation of Rising Chinese Power. In Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, ed. D.L. Shambaugh, 347–361. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Yuan, J.D. 2010. The Dragon and the Elephant: Chinese-Indian Relations in the 21st Century. In China’s International Relations in Asia. Volume IV – East Asia Responds to a Rising China, ed. L. Mingjiang, 123–135. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, Y., and S. Tang. 2005. China’s Regional Strategy. In Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, ed. D.L. Shambaugh, 48–68. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Chong
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Multilateralism StudiesS. Rajaratnam School of International StudiesSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations