Investigating Social Presence and Communication with Embodied Avatars in Room-Scale Virtual Reality

  • Scott W. GreenwaldEmail author
  • Zhangyuan Wang
  • Markus Funk
  • Pattie Maes
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 725)


Room-scale virtual reality (VR) holds great potential as a medium for communication and collaboration in remote and same-time, same-place settings. Related work has established that movement realism can create a strong sense of social presence, even in the absence of photorealism. Here, we explore the noteworthy attributes of communicative interaction using embodied minimal avatars in room-scale VR in the same-time, same-place setting. Our system is the first in the research community to enable this kind of interaction, as far as we are aware. We carried out an experiment in which pairs of users performed two activities in contrasting variants: VR vs. face-to-face (F2F), and 2D vs. 3D. Objective and subjective measures were used to compare these, including motion analysis, electrodermal activity, questionnaires, retrospective think-aloud protocol, and interviews. On the whole, participants communicated effectively in VR to complete their tasks, and reported a strong sense of social presence. The system’s high fidelity capture and display of movement seems to have been a key factor in supporting this. Our results confirm some expected shortcomings of VR compared to F2F, but also some non-obvious advantages. The limited anthropomorphic properties of the avatars presented some difficulties, but the impact of these varied widely between the activities. In the 2D vs. 3D comparison, the basic affordance of freehand drawing in 3D was new to most participants, resulting in novel observations and open questions. We also present methodological observations across all conditions concerning the measures that did and did not reveal differences between conditions, including unanticipated properties of the think-aloud protocol applied to VR.


Room-scale virtual reality Copresence Non-verbal communication Collaboration 



We would like to thank Hisham Bedri and Ronen Zilberman for their contributions to the project, and Chris Schmandt for his useful feedback.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 201864 KB)


  1. 1.
    Bailenson, J.N., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., Persky, S., Dimov, A., Blascovich, J.: The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 14(4), 379–393 (2005). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N.: Digital chameleons: automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychol. Sci. 16(10), 814–819 (2005). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blascovich, J.: Social influence within immersive virtual environments. In: Schroeder, R. (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 127–145. Springer, London (2002). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0277-9_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davidson, J.N., Campbell, D.A.: Collaborative design in virtual space - greenspace ii: a shared environment for architectural design review. In: McIntosh, P., Ozel, F. (eds.) Design Computation: Collaboration, Reasoning, Pedagogy: Acadia Conference Proceedings, pp. 165–179. ACADIA, Tucson, October 1996.
  5. 5.
    Doberenz, S., Roth, W.T., Wollburg, E., Maslowski, N.I., Kim, S.: Methodological considerations in ambulatory skin conductance monitoring. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 80(2), 87–95 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fox, J., Ahn, S.J.G., Janssen, J.H., Yeykelis, L., Segovia, K.Y., Bailenson, J.N.: Avatars versus agents: a meta-analysis quantifying the effect of agency on social influence. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30(5), 401–432 (2015). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garau, M., Slater, M., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni, A., Steed, A., Sasse, M.A.: The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2003, p. 529. ACM Press, New York, April 2003.
  8. 8.
    Greenwald, S.W., Corning, W. Maes, P.: Multi-user framework for collaboration and co-creation in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2017).
  9. 9.
    Hollan, J., Stornetta, S.: Beyond being there. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1992, pp. 119–125. ACM, New York (1992).
  10. 10.
    Isaacs, E.A., Tang, J.C.: What video can and cannot do for collaboration: a case study. Multimedia Syst. 2(2), 63–73 (1994). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, S., Lee, G., Sakata, N., Billinghurst, M.: Improving co-presence with augmented visual communication cues for sharing experience through video conference. In: 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 83–92. IEEE, September 2014.
  12. 12.
    Okada, K.I., Maeda, F., Ichikawaa, Y., Matsushita, Y.: Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW 1994, pp. 385–393. ACM Press, New York, October 1994.
  13. 13.
    Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V.: Transcending the self in immersive virtual reality. Computer 47(7), 24–30 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott W. Greenwald
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhangyuan Wang
    • 1
  • Markus Funk
    • 1
  • Pattie Maes
    • 1
  1. 1.MIT Media LabCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations