Advertisement

The Good, the Ugly and the ‘Dirty Harry’s of Conservation: Rethinking the Anthropology of Conservation NGOs

  • Peter Bille Larsen
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability book series (PSAS)

Abstract

For the past decade, narrative portrayals of nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) growing big, ‘ugly’ and business-minded have become common in both social science and public discourse. At a time when both engagement within NGOs and critical analysis from the outside have blossomed, how are the social sciences and anthropology, in particular, responding? This chapter suggests that a set of meta-narratives characterise much of the literature analysing conservation NGOs. Such narratives, respectively, position NGOs as doing good, turning ugly or acting pragmatically through what this author labels ‘Dirty Harry’ characteristics. Even though the critique of conservation NGOs offers a much-needed ‘reality check’, it is time to revisit dichotomies of the ‘good’ past and the ‘ugly’ present. The chapter reviews trends in the literature and offers a case study from the Peruvian Amazon. The final synthesis emphasises the need for a less essentialist perspective that traces heterogeneity and change of NGO activity over time.

References

  1. Bamberg, M. 2005. Master Narratives. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, ed. D. Herman, M. Jahn, and R. Marie-Laure, 287–288. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, Michael. 2009. When Environmentalists Legitimize Plunder. Swans Commentary. http://www.swans.com/library/art15/barker12.html. Accessed 18 Sep 2013.
  3. ———. 2010. An Interview with Daniel Faber: Foundations and the Environmental Movement. Counterpunch. http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/09/13/foundations-and-the-environmental-movement/. Accessed 13 Sep 2010.
  4. Benjaminsen, Tor A., and Hanne Svarstad. 2010. Questioning Conservation Practice—And Its Response: The Establishment of Namaqua National Park. Current Conservation 3 (3): 8–9.Google Scholar
  5. Birchard, Bill. 2005. Nature’s Keepers: The Remarkable History of How the Nature Conservancy Became the Largest Environmental Organization in the World. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Brockington, Dan, and Rosaleen Duffy. 2010. Capitalism and Conservation: The Production and Reproduction of Biodiversity Conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockington, Dan, and Katherine Scholfield. 2010. The Conservationist Mode of Production and Conservation NGOs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Antipode 42 (3): 551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brosius, Peter. 1999. Green Dots, Pink Hearts: Displacing Politics from the Malaysian Rainforest. American Anthropologist 101 (1): 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brosius, Peter, and Lisa Campbell. 2010. Collaborative Event Ethnography: Conservation and Development Trade-Offs at the Fourth World Conservation Congress. Conservation and Society 8 (4): 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapin, Mac. 2004. A Challenge to Conservationists. World Watch Magazine 17 (November/December): 17–31.Google Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, Pratap, and Matthias Finger. 1994. The Earth Brokers: Power, Politics and World Development. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Cooley, Alexander, and James Ron. 2002. The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action. International Security 27 (1): 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corson, Catherine. 2010. Shifting Environmental Governance in a Neoliberal World: USAID for Conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 567–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corson, Catherine, and Kenneth lain MacDonald. 2012. Enclosing the Global Commons: The Convention on Biological Diversity and Green Grabbing. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doane, Molly. 2014. From Community Conservation to the Lone (Forest) Ranger: Accumulation by Conservation in a Mexican Forest. Conservation and Society 12 (3): 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dourojeanni, Marc Jean, and Carlos F. Ponce. 1978. Los parques nacionales del Peru. Madrid: Instituto de la Caza Fotográfica y Ciencias de la Naturaleza.Google Scholar
  17. Dourojeanni, Marc, Luis Ramirez, and Oscar Rada. 2012. Indígenas, campesinos y grandes empresas: Experiencias de los Programas de Monitoreo Socio-Ambiental Comunitarios. Lima: ProNaturaleza.Google Scholar
  18. Escobar, Arturo. 1998. Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements. Journal of Political Ecology 5: 53–82.Google Scholar
  19. Fairhead, James, Melissa Leach, and Ian Scoones. 2012. Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fassin, Didier. 2013. On Resentment and Ressentiment: The Politics and Ethics of Moral Emotions. Current Anthropology 54 (3): 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finer, M., Clinton N. Jenkins, Stuart L. Pimm, Brian Keane, and Carl Ross. 2008. Oil and Gas Projects in the Western Amazon: Threats to Wilderness, Biodiversity, and Indigenous Peoples. PloS One 8: e2932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. González, Ana Maria, and Angela Sue Martin. 2007. Partners in Protected Area Conservation: Experiences of the Parks in Peril Programme in Latin America and the Caribbean. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
  23. Grandia, Liza. 2009. Special Issue Between Bolivar and Bureaucracy: The Mesoamerican Biological Corridor. Conservation and Society 5 (4): 478–503.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2010. Silent Spring in the Land of Eternal Spring: The Germination of a Conservation Conflict. Current Conservation 3 (3): 10–13.Google Scholar
  25. Gunte, Michael M., and Ariane C. Rosen. 2012. Two-level Games of International Environmental NGOs in China. William and Mary Policy Review 3: 270–294.Google Scholar
  26. Hajer, Maarten. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Holdgate, Martin. 1999. The Green Web: A Union for the World Conservation. London: IUCN & Earthscan.Google Scholar
  28. Holmes, George. 2011. Conservation’s Friends in High Places: Neoliberalism, Networks, and the Transnational Conservation Elite. Global Environmental Politics 11 (4): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Husock, Howard. 1997. Dealing with a Changing Environment: Fundacion Peruana para la Conservacion de la Naturaleza. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government, Case Programme.Google Scholar
  30. Igoe, James, and Dan Brockington. 2007. Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction. Conservation and Society 5 (4): 432–449.Google Scholar
  31. Igoe, James, Sian Sullivan, and Dan Brockington. 2010. Problematising Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation: Displaced and Disobedient Knowledge. Current Conservation 3 (3): 4–7.Google Scholar
  32. Jepson, Paul. 2005. Governance and Accountability of Environmental NGOs. Environmental Science & Policy 8: 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khare, Arvind, and David B. Bray. 2004. Study of Critical New Forest Conservation Issues in the Global South New York. New York: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, Naomi. 2013. The Giants of the Green World That Profit from the Planet’s Destruction. The Guardian (first published in the Nation). May 3.Google Scholar
  35. Klockars, Carl B. 1980. The Dirty Harry Problem. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 452: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laidler-Kylander, Nathalie, John A. Quelch, and Bernard L. Simonin. 2007. Building and Valuing Global Brands in the Nonprofit Sector. Non-profit Management and Leadership 17 (3): 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larsen, Peter Bille. 2011. Municipal Environmental Governance in the Peruvian Amazon: A Case Study in Local Matters of (in)Significance. Management of Environmental Quality 22 (3): 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2013. The Politics of Technicality: Guidance Culture in Environmental Governance and the International Sphere. In The Gloss of Harmony: The Politics of Policy Making in Multilateral Organisations, ed. Birgit Müller. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2015. Post-frontier Resource Governance: Indigenous Rights, Extraction and Conservation in the Peruvian Amazon. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larsen, Peter Bille, and Arlen Gaspar. 2012. Biosphere Reserves and Extractive Industries: Towards a New Sustainability Agenda, Evidence for Policy Series. La Paz: NCCR JACS SAM.Google Scholar
  41. Levine, Arielle. 2002. Convergence or Convenience? International Conservation NGOs and Development Assistance in Tanzania. World Development 30 (6): 1043–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewis, David, and Nazneen Kanji. 2009. Non-governmental Organizations and Development. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Linera, Alvaro García. 2012. GeoPolítica de la Amazónia: Poder Hacendal-Patrimonial y Acumulación Capitalista. La Paz: Vicepresidencia de la República.Google Scholar
  44. Lockyer, Joshua, and James Veteto. 2013. Anthropology Engaging Ecotopia. Bioregionalism, Permaculture, and Ecovillages. New York: Berghan.Google Scholar
  45. MacDonald, Kenneth. 2010. The Devil Is in the (Bio)Diversity: Private Sector ‘Engagement’ and the Restructuring of Biodiversity Conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 513–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morges Manifesto. 1961. We Must Save the World’s Wildlife: An International Declaration. Morges: WWF.Google Scholar
  47. Miller, Shawn. 2007. An Environmental History of Latin America, New Approaches to the Americas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mittermeier, Russell A., N. Myers, and C.G. Mittermeier. 1999. Hotspots: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. San Pedro Garza Garcia: Cemex & Conservation International.Google Scholar
  49. Pinzas, T., J. Danziger, and B. Pratt. 1997. Partners or Contractors? The Relationship Between Official Agencies and NGOs–Peru. Oxford: Intrac.Google Scholar
  50. ProNaturaleza. 2013. Memoria Institucional 2012. Lima: ProNaturaleza–Fundación Peruana para la Conservación de la Naturaleza.Google Scholar
  51. Roberts, Carter, and Chris Hails. 2005. From the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). World Watch Magazine 17: 16–17.Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, John. 2012. Common and Conflicting Interests in the Engagements Between Conservation Organizations and Corporations. Conservation Biology 26: 967–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodríguez, J.P., A.B. Taber, P. Daszak, et al. 2007. Globalization of Conservation: A View from the South. Science 317: 755–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roy, Arundhati. 2012. Capitalism: A Ghost Story. Outlook India. http://www.outlookindia.com/article/capitalism-a-ghost-story/280234. Accessed 26 Mar 2012.
  55. Sachedina, H., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2010. The Spectacular Growth of a Conservation NGO and the Paradoxes of Neoliberal Conservation. Current Conservation 3 (3): 24–27.Google Scholar
  56. Sachs, W. 2010. The Development Dictionary. London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  57. Sampson, Steven. 2002. Weak States, Uncivil Societies and Thousands of NGOs: Western Democracy Export as Benevolent Colonialism in the Balkans. In Cultural Boundaries of the Balkans, ed. Sanimir Recic. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Seligmann, Peter. 2011. Partnerships for the Planet: Why We Must Engage Corporations. Huffington Post Blog. Posted: 05/19/2011 12:56 pm EDT Updated: 07/19/2011 5:12 am EDT. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-seligmann/conservation-international-lockheed-martin_b_863876.html. Accessed 24 Dec 2015.
  59. Smith, Richard C. 1982. Dialectics of Domination in Perú: Native Communities and the Myth of the Vast Amazonian Emptiness: An analysis of Development Planning in the Pichis Palcazu Special Project. In Cultural Survival Occasional Paper 8. Cambridge, MA: Cultural Survival Institute.Google Scholar
  60. Waldron, Anthony, et al. 2013. Targeting Global Conservation Funding to Limit Immediate Biodiversity Declines. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Early Edition: 12144–12148.Google Scholar
  61. West, Paige. 2006. Conservation Is Our Government Now: The Politics of Ecology in Papua New Guinea. 1st ed. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Bille Larsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of LucerneLucerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations