Advertisement

Saving Schools: Vacancy, Ruin, and Adaptive Reuse in Detroit

  • James Macmillen
  • Trevor Pinch
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter follows a small team of urban planners as they tour thirteen vacant schools in Detroit. The schools were selected from a list of fifty-seven that the City of Detroit recently acquired from the Detroit Public School system. They were reputed to be “the thirteen best”—buildings for which “adaptive reuse” might be possible. Drawing on concepts of nonhuman agency, decay, repair, and folk theory, we examine the planners’ engagement with the schools’ surroundings, their affective and emotional reactions to materiality, and how they ultimately made decisions about the buildings’ fate. If the schools impressed the planners—in their historic significance or future potential—they would be “saved.” If they did not, they would be demolished.

References

  1. Apel, Dora. 2015. Beautiful Terrible Ruins: Detroit and the Anxiety of Decline. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Buch, Elana D. 2015. Anthropology of Aging and Care. Annual Review of Anthropology 44 (1): 277–293. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callon, Michel. 1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Sociological Review Monograph 32, ed. John Law, 196–233. London; Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Callon, Michel, and Bruno Latour. 1981. Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So. In Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro- Sociologies, ed. Karin Knorr-Cetina and Aaron Cicourel, 277–303. Boston, MA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Caro, Robert A. 1975. The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  6. City of Detroit. 1951. Detroit Master Plan: Plans for a Finer City. Detroit: City Plan Commission.Google Scholar
  7. Colloredo-Mansfeld, Rudi. 2003. Matter Unbound. Journal of Material Culture 8 (3): 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cosgrove, Denis E. 1984. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. Croom Helm Historical Geography Series. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  9. de la Bellacasa, Maria Puig. 2011. Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things. Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106. doi: 10.1177/0306312710380301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeSilvey, Caitlin. 2006. Observed Decay: Telling Stories with Mutable Things. Journal of Material Culture 11 (3): 318–338. doi: 10.1177/1359183506068808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doucet, Brian, and Drew Philip. 2016. In Detroit ‘Ruin Porn’ Ignores the Voices of Those Who Still Call the City Home. The Guardian, February 15.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edensor, Tim. 2005. Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics, and Materiality. Oxford, UK; New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  14. Forester, John. 2009. Dealing with Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Geismar, Haidy. 2015. Anthropology and Heritage Regimes. Annual Review of Anthropology 44 (1): 71–85. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grover, John, and Yvette van der Velde. 2016. A School District in Crisis: Detroit’s Public Schools 1843–2015. Detroit: Loveland Technologies.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, Peter, and Mark Tewdwr-Jones. 2011. Urban and Regional Planning. 5th ed. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Holston, James. 1989. The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasília. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, Steven J. 2014. Rethinking Repair. In Media Technologies, ed. Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 221–240. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  21. Joerges, Bernward. 1999. Do Politics have Artefacts? Social Studies of Science 29 (3): 411–431. doi: 10.1177/030631299029003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelling, George, and James Wilson. 1982. Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety. Atlantic Monthly 249 (3): 29–38.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, Bruno. 1991. Technology is Society Made Durable. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Sociological Review Monograph 38, ed. John Law, 103–131. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2004. Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marchand, Yves, and Romain Meffre. 2010. The Ruins of Detroit. Göttingen: Steidl.Google Scholar
  26. Marx, Karl. 1867. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. V. 1: Penguin Classics. London; New York, NY: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, Daniel. 2010. Stuff. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Munn, Nancy D. 2013. The Decline and Fall of Richmond Hill: Commodification and Place-Change in Late 18th–early 19th Century New York. Anthropological Theory 13 (1–2): 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Parks Service. 2000. Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Archeological Properties. Washington, DC: Department of the Interior. https://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/arch/
  30. Rip, Arie. 2006. Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists. Science as Culture 15 (4): 349–365. doi: 10.1080/09505430601022676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sayes, Edwin. 2014. Actor–Network Theory and Methodology: Just What Does It Mean to Say That Nonhumans Have Agency? Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 134–149. doi: 10.1177/0306312713511867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tapsell, Paul. 2011. Aroha Mai: Whose Museum? In The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics: Redefining Ethics for the Twenty-First-Century Museum, ed. Janet Marstine, 85–111. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Tomlan, Michael A. 2015. Historic Preservation. Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-04975-5
  34. Waldheim, Charles. 2013. Detroit, Disabitato, and the Origins of Landscape. In Formerly Urban: Projecting Rust Belt Futures, First edition, New City Books, ed. Julia Czerniak, 166–183. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University School of Architecture and Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  35. Weber, Max. 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, Sydney H. 1980. The Ladislas Segoe Tapes: Transcript of an Interview with Ladislas Segoe. Cornell University. American Planning Association.Google Scholar
  37. Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Zaniewski, Ann. 2014. Detroit Forgives DPS Debt in Exchange for Empty Schools. Detroit Free Press, October 29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Macmillen
    • 1
  • Trevor Pinch
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of City and Regional PlanningCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Science and Technology StudiesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations