Measuring and Safeguarding Intellectual Capital

  • Klaus North
  • Gita Kumta
Chapter
Part of the Springer Texts in Business and Economics book series (STBE)

Abstract

This chapter addresses the issues of intellectual capital reporting and how to protect and safeguard the knowledge of an organisation. The challenge to define adequate measures reflecting the contribution of intangible assets to value creation and business success is discussed. Several approaches of intellectual capital reporting and intangible assets monitoring are presented. The second part of the chapter is devoted to knowledge risks and means of protecting intellectual assets. The KM tool presented at the end of the chapter is the knowledge inven tory.

References

  1. Abhayawansa, S., & Guthrie, J. (2014). Importance of intellectual capital information: A study of Australian analyst reports. Australian Accounting Review, 1, 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornemann, M., & Leitner, K.-H. (2002). Entwicklung und Realisierung einer Wissensbilanz für eine Forschungsorganisation. Eine Fallstudie zum Forschungszentrum Austrian Research Centers Seibersdorf. In P. Pawlowsky & R. Reinhardt (Eds.), Wissensmanagement für die Praxis: Methoden und Instrumente zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung (pp. 335–367). Neuwied o. J: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  3. Bueno, E., Salmador, M. P., & Longo-Somoza, M. (2014). Advances in the identification and measurement of intellectual capital and future developments in the intellectual capital research agenda: Experience of the intellectus model and proposal of a synthetic index. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12(3), 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danish Agency for Trade and Industry. (2000). A guideline for intellectual capital statements (p. 1). Copenhagen: Danish Ministry for Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey, M., & Lusch, R. (1997). Protecting the core competencies of a company: Intangible asset security. European Management Journal, 15(4), 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Tarkiainen, A. (2011). Knowledge protection and knowledge sharing – Benefits and problems in networked innovation. http://www.imp2011.org/add_articles/Knowledge%20protection%20and%20knowledge%20sharing%20-%20benefits%20and%20problems%20in%20networked%20innovation.pdf
  7. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Leitner, K.-H., et al. (2000). Entwicklung eines Bilanzierungssystems. Forschung Austria Report_A.03_08/00, Forschung Austria, Wien.Google Scholar
  9. Mouritson, J., Larsen, HT., & Bukh, PND. (2001). Intellectual capital and the capable firm: Narration, visualization and numbering for numbering knowledge. Report Copenhagen Business School and Aarhus School of Business.Google Scholar
  10. North, K., Probst, G., & Romhardt, K. (1998). Wissen messen. Ansätze, Erfahrungen und kritische Fragen. Zeitschrift für Führung und Organisation, 67(3), 158–166.Google Scholar
  11. North, K. (1999). Wissensorientierte Unternehmensführung: Wertschöpfung durch Wissen. (6th ed. 2016). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. North, K., & Gueldenberg, S. (2011). Effective knowledge work. London: Emerald.Google Scholar
  13. Petrash, G. (1996). Dow’s journey to a knowledge value management culture. European Management Journal, 14(4), 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (1997). Wissen managen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  15. Quinn, J. B. (1992). Intelligent enterprise. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Roos, J., et al. (1998). Intellectual capital. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
  18. Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler. http://www.sveiby.com.au.Google Scholar
  19. Sveiby, K.-E. (2010). Methods for measuring intangible assets. http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm
  20. Veltri, S., & Bronzetti, G. (2015). A critical analysis of the intellectual capital measuring, managing, and reporting practices in the non-profit sector: Lessons learnt from a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus North
    • 1
  • Gita Kumta
    • 2
  1. 1.Wiesbaden Business School, Hochschule RheinMainWiesbadenGermany
  2. 2.School of Business Management, SVKM’s Narsee Monj. Inst. of Management StudiesMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations