Advertisement

The Fun and Games of Creative Citizenship: Urban Cultural Policy and Participatory Public Art

  • Saara Liinamaa
Chapter

Abstract

The creative city model of culture-led urban development and economic growth has deeply influenced urban cultural policy in the contemporary moment. Returning to a history of artistic and social theories of play, and attending to the specific dynamics and characteristics of contemporary art’s urban play practices, this chapter offers a much more tempered version of what a vision of the city-as-playground entails; in particular, we must consider the demands that it places on urban subjects, social relations, and concepts of citizenship and participation. By strategically drawing on the varied but powerful associations that the term creativity carries in popular culture, the creative city promises not only a more economically viable city but also, by association, a city that is both freer and more fun.

Bibliography

  1. Andreotti, Libero. 2000. Play-Tactics of the ‘Internationale Situationniste’. October 91 (Winter): 36–58.Google Scholar
  2. Aragon, Louis. 1970. Nightwalker. Trans. Frederick Brown. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, Kendall, Gordon Waitt, Nicholas Gill, and Chris Gibson. 2006. Community and Nostalgia in Urban Revitalisation: A Critique of Urban Village and Creative Class Strategies as Remedies for Social ‘Problems’. Australian Geographer 37 (3): 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baudelaire, Charles. 1972. Baudelaire: Selected Writings on Art and Artists. Trans. P.E. Charvet. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Bayliss, Darrin. 2007. The Rise of the Creative City: Culture and Creativity in Copenhagen. European Planning Studies 15 (7): 889–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beech, Dave. 2008. Include Me Out! Art Monthly 315 (April): 1–3.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, Walter. 2002. The Arcades Project. Trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA; London, UK: Belknap Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2005. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings. Vol. 2, part 1. Ed. Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  10. Billing, Johanna, Maria Lind, and Lars Nilsson. 2007. Taking the Matter into Common Hands: On Contemporary Art and Collaborative Practices. London: Black Dog Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bishop, Claire, ed. 2004. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. October 110 (Fall): 51–79.Google Scholar
  12. ———, ed. 2006. Participation. Documents of Contemporary Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. Dijon: Les presses du réel.Google Scholar
  15. Breton, André. 1960. Nadja. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2003. Artificial Hells, Inauguration of the ‘1921 Dada Season’. October 105 (Summer): 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caillois, Roger. 1958. Man, Play, and Games. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2003. The Edge of Surrealism: A Roger Caillois Reader. Ed. and Trans. Claudine Frank. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Catungal, John Paul, and Deborah Leslie. 2009. Placing Power in the Creative City: Governmentalities and Subjectivities in Liberty Village, Toronto. Environment and Planning A 41: 2576–2594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Catungal, John Paul, Deborah Leslie, and Yvonne Hii. 2009. Geographies of Displacement in the Creative City: The Case of Liberty Village, Toronto. Urban Studies 46: 1095–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Debord, Guy. 1955. Architecture and Play. Potlatch no. 20. http://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/presitu/andplay.html
  22. ———. 1958. Contribution to a Situationist Definition of Play. Internationale Situationniste no.1, June, [online]. http://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/play.html
  23. ———. 1977. The Game of War. London: Atlas Press.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, Graeme. 2009. Creative Cities, Creative Spaces and Urban Policy. Urban Studies 46: 1003–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fjen, Hedwig. 2007. Public Lecuture. Visible City Project + Archive. Accessed 27 July 2010. http://www.visiblecity.ca/home/
  26. Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Foster, Hal. 2006. Chat Rooms. In Participation, ed. Claire Bishop, 190–195. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press/Whitechapel.Google Scholar
  28. Frank, Claudine, ed. 2003. The Edge of Surrealism: A Roger Caillois Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Freud, Sigmund. 1991. On Metapsychology: The Theory of Psychoanalysis. Penguin Freud XI. Trans. J. Strachey. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Gertler, Meric, et al. 2006. Imagine a Toronto … Strategies for a Creative City. Toronto: Munk Centre for International Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1961. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merill.Google Scholar
  33. Grundy, John, and Julie-Anne Boudreau. 2008. ‘Living with Culture’: Creative Citizenship Practices in Toronto. Citizenship Studies 12 (4): 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holston, James, and Arjun Appadurai. 1996. Cities and Citizenship. Public Culture 8 (2): 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huizinga, Johan. 1950. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Klein, Melanie. 1984. Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works, 1921–1945. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Landry, Charles. 2000. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovation. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Laxton, Susan. 2003. The Guarantor of Chance: Surrealism’s Ludic Practices. Papers of Surrealism 1. http://www.surrealismcentre.ac.uk/publications/papers/journal1/index.htm
  39. ———. 2004. Paris as Gameboard: Ludic Strategies in Surrealism. PhD diss., R. Krauss. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  40. Lefebvre, Henri. 1996. Writing on Cities. Trans. Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis, N., and B. Donald. 2010. A New Rubric for ‘Creative City’ Potential in Canada’s Smaller Cities. Urban Studies 47 (1): 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyotard, Jean-François, and Jean-Loup Thébaud. 1985. Just Gaming. Trans. Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  43. Manifesta 5. 2004. Manifesta 5: European Biennial of Contemporary Art. Accessed 25 February 2006. http://www.manifesta.es/
  44. Markusen, A. 2006. Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists. Environment and Planning A 38 (10): 1921–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCann, E. 2007. Inequality and Politics in the Creative City-Region: Questions of Livability and Strategy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (1): 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miles, Malcolm. 2005a. Interruptions: Testing the Rhetoric of Culturally Led Urban Development. Urban Studies 42 (5/6): 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miles, Simon. 2005b. Creativity, Culture and Urban Development: Toronto Examined. DISP 162 (3): 70–87.Google Scholar
  48. Mould, Oliver. 2015. Urban Subversion and the Creative City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Newmindspace. 2007. Accessed 15 May 2007. http://newmindspace.com
  50. Nuit Blanche Toronto. 2010. Event History. Accesssed 13 June 2017. https://nbto.com/about/event-history.html
  51. O’Donnell, Darren. 2006. Social Acupuncture. Toronto: Coach House.Google Scholar
  52. Papastergiadis, Nikos. 2009. Collaboration in Art and Society: A Global Pursuit of Democratic Dialogue. In New Communities, ed. Nina Möntmann, 31–51. Toronto: Public Books/The Power Plant.Google Scholar
  53. Peck, Jamie. 2005. Struggling with the Creative Class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (4): 740–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ponzini, D., and U. Rossi. 2010. Becoming a Creative City: The Entrepreneurial Mayor, Network Politics and the Promise of an Urban Renaissance. Urban Studies 47 (5): 1037–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pope, Rob. 2005. Creativity: Theory, History, Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Pratt, A. 2008. Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class. Geographiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 90 (2): 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scott, A.J. 2006. Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions. Journal of Urban Affairs 28 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. ———. 2010. Cultural Economy and the Creative Field of the City. Geografiska Annaler, Series B—Human Geography 92: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sennett, Richard. 1978. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  60. Simmel, Georg. 1971. On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings. Trans. Donald N. Levine. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Stevens, Quentin. 2007. The Ludic City: Exploring the Potential of Public Spaces. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  62. Vicari Haddock, Serena, ed. 2010. Brand-Building: The Creative City: A Critical Look at Current Concepts and Practices. Firenze, Italy: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Zimmerman, J. 2008. From Brew Town to Cool Town: Neoliberalism and the Creative City Development Strategy in Milwaukee. Cities 25: 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saara Liinamaa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyAcadia UniversityWolfvilleCanada

Personalised recommendations