‘Doing Gender’ Across Cultures: Gender Negotiations in European Bi-national Couple Relationships

  • Benedicte Brahic
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)


Based on a series of in-depth semi-structured interviews with 32 bi-national couples living in Manchester (UK), this chapter explores some of the negotiations around aspects of gender in mixed couples. Lacking a shared cultural bedrock (of which gender is constitutive), partners in bi-national relationships face the task of assembling their own hybrid bedrock to cradle their life together. Subsequently, partners embark on an ad hoc exploration of the practice of gender in their relationship leading them to reflect on gender performances, gender relations, and how they intersect with culture. This leads partners to negotiate and strategize around their practice of gender in their couple relationship. Nonetheless, while an increased fluidity in ‘doing’ gender bears the potential for more democratic relationships, deep-seated gendered practices whereby women deliver the bulk of the emotional labour and care still endure.


  1. Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1999. On the Way to a Post-Familial Family: From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities. In Love and Eroticism, ed. M. Featherstone, 36–53. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Brahic, B. 2013. The Politics of Bi-nationality in Couple Relationships: A Case Study of European Bi-national Couples in Manchester. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 44 (6): 699–714.Google Scholar
  3. Caballero, C., R. Edwards, and D. Smith. 2008. Cultures of Mixing: Understanding Partnerships Across Ethnicity. Twenty-First Century Society 3 (1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cottrell, A.B. 1990. Cross-National Marriages: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 21 (2): 151–169.Google Scholar
  5. Favell, A. 2003. Eurostars and Eurocities: Towards a Sociology of Free Moving Professionals in Western Europe. [Online]. Retrieved from:
  6. ———. 2006. London as Eurocity: French Free Movers in the Economic Capital of Europe. In The Human Face of Global Mobility, ed. M. Smith and A. Favell, 247–275. New Brunswick: Transaction publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Favell, A., and E. Recchi. 2009. Pioneers of European Integration: An Introduction. In Pioneers of European Integration: Citizenship and Mobility in the EU, ed. E. Recchi and A. Favell, 1–25. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Gaspar, S. 2012. Patterns of Bi-national Couples Across Five EU Countries. Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas 70 (1): 71–89.Google Scholar
  9. Giabiconi, D. 2005. ‘Filles de l’Est : Construction d’une féminité racisée’, Document de travail LEST, CNRS, Paris. [Online]. Retrieved from:
  10. Giddens, A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy, Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goulbourne, H., T. Reynolds, J. Solomos, and E. Zontini. 2010. Transnational Families: Ethnicities, Identities and Social Capital. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Heath S., D. McGhee, and P. Trevena 2011. Lost in Transnationalism: Unravelling the Conceptualisation of Families and Personal Life Through a Transnational Gaze. Sociological Research Online 16 (4). [Online]. Retrieved from: Scholar
  13. Jamieson, L. 1998. Intimacy, Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Klesse, C. 2007. On the Road to Equality? Gender, Sexuality and Race in Sociological Meta-narratives on the Transformation of Intimacy. In Sexual Politics of Desire and Belonging, ed. N. Rumens and A. Cervantes-Carson, 59–79. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  15. Kofman, E. 2000. The Invisibility of Skilled Female Migrants in European Migratory Spaces. International Journal of Population Geography 6 (1): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2004. Family-Related Migration: A Critical Review of European Studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30 (2): 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mahler, S., and P. Pessar. 2001. Gendered Geographies of Power: Analyzing Gender Across Transnational Spaces. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 7: 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Office for National Statistics. 2013. Local Area Migration Indicators. [Online]. Retrieved from:
  19. Peck, J., and K. Ward. 2002. Placing Manchester. In City of Revolution: Restructuring Manchester, ed. J. Peck and K. Ward, 1–17. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pessar P., and S. Mahler 2003. Gender and Transnational Migration. Working Paper Transnational Communities Programme, WPTC 01–20. [Online]. Retrieved from:
  21. Recchi, E. 2006. From Migrants to Movers: Citizenship and Mobility in the European Union. In The Human Face of Global Mobility, ed. M. Smith and A. Favell, 53–77. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Recchi, E., D. Tambini, E. Baldoni, D. Williams, K. Surak, and A. Favell. 2003. Intra-EU Migration: A Socio-demographic Overview. State of the Art Report. PIONEUR Working Paper No. 3. [Online]. Retrieved from:
  23. Recchi, E., D. Tambini, A. Muxel, M. Braun, and A. Alaminos. 2006. Pioneers of European Integration ‘From Below’: Mobility and the Emergence of European Identity Among National and Foreign Citizens in the EU. PIONEUR Executive Report. [Online]. Retrieved from:
  24. Weeks, J. 1999. The Sexual Citizen. In Love and Eroticism, ed. M. Featherstone, 35–52. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedicte Brahic
    • 1
  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations