Advertisement

The Scottish Independence Referendum: Lessons Learned for the Future

  • Elisenda Casanas-Adam
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyses the lessons learned from Scottish independence referendum as a model for future referendums held by sub-state national units to decide on their constitutional future, either for Scotland and further afield. It begins by highlighting the main positive aspects of the process. It argues that the Scottish independence referendum was an example of political negotiation and agreement between the Scottish and UK governments that provided a solid legal framework for the referendum, including the setting of a clear, neutral and independently tested question. This enabled an extensive informed and deliberative process focused on the central issue to be decided: independence for Scotland. The chapter then considers two factors that added unnecessary uncertainty to the referendum debate and had an impact on the decisiveness of the outcome. The first was the importance of continuing EU membership for Scotland and the lack of a clear position in EU law on what would happen in the case of a ‘Yes’ vote. The second was the removal of the intermediate option between ‘independence’ and the ‘status quo’ from the ballot paper, despite it being the preferred option of a significant majority of Scottish citizens. The chapter concludes that a clear and effectively neutral position from the EU would be required to avoid this issue affecting the debate and decision on an internal constitutional issue, and that more generally a multi-option referendum may be more suited to providing an encompassing debate on the sub-state national unit’s constitutional future and a more decisive outcome.

Keywords

Plurinational state Federalism Scotland Catalonia 

References

  1. Anderson G, Bell C, Craig S, MacHarg A, Mullen T, Tierney S, Walker N (2012) The independence referendum, legality and the contested constitution: widening the debate. UK Constitutional Law Blog. Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2012/01/31/gavin-anderson-et-al-the-independence-referendum-legality-and-the-contested-constitution-widening-the-debate/
  2. Aroney N (2014) Reserved matters, legislative purpose and the referendum on Scottish independence. Public Law:422–445Google Scholar
  3. BBC (2014) Scottish independence: Barroso says joining EU would be ‘difficult’. BBC News. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-26215963
  4. Boyle A, Crawford J (2013) Opinion: referendum on the independence of Scotland – international law aspects. Annex A. In: UK Government (ed) Scotland analysis: devolution and the implications of Scottish independence. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scotland-analysis-devolution-and-the-implications-of-scottish-independence
  5. Boyle K, Tierney S (2014) The vow delivered? Experts respond to the recommendations of the Smith Commission. Democratic Audit UK. Available at: http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=9578
  6. Burgess M, Tarr GA (eds) (2012) Constitutional dynamics in federal systems. Sub-national perspectives. Forum of federations. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Ontario, 352 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrel S (2016) Second Scottish independence vote not yet on table, says Nicola Sturgeon. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/01/scottish-independence-vote-referendum-off-table-nicola-sturgeon
  8. Carrell S (2012) Barroso casts doubt on independent Scotland’s EU membership rights. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/sep/12/barroso-doubt-scotland-eu-membership
  9. Carrell S (2014) Alex Salmond accepts defeat and presses for new Holyrood powers. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/19/alex-salmond-accepts-scotland-independence-defeat-holyrood-powers
  10. Casanas Adam E (2014) Self-determination and the use of referendums: the case of Scotland. Int J Polit Cult Soc 27(1):47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casanas Adam E (2017) The constitutional court of Spain: from system-balancer to centralizing polarist, and now the central state’s enforcer? In: Aroney N, Kinkaid J (eds) Courts in federal countries: federalists or unitarists? University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, pp 367–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtice J (2015) Scotland ‘One year On’: the legacy of the independence referendum. Discussion Paper, International Public Policy Institute, University of Strathclyde. Available at: https://pure.strath.ac.uk/portal/files/44366982/Curtice_IPPI2015_scotland_one_year_on_the_legacy_of_the_independence_referendum.pdf
  13. Douglas-Scott S (2014a) How easily could an independent Scotland join the EU? University of Oxford Legal Research Paper Series. Paper No XXX/2014Google Scholar
  14. Hopkins S (2016) Nicola Sturgeon confirms intention to relaunch SNP’s independence campaign. The Huffington Post. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/nicola-sturgeon-confirms-intention-to-relaunch-snps-independence-campaign_uk_572f557ae4b0ade291a2027e
  15. Johnson S (2014) Nicola Sturgeon urged to stop referendum ‘betrayal bandwagon’. The Telegraph. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11170398/Nicola-Sturgeon-urged-to-stop-referendum-betrayal-bandwagon.html
  16. Jovanovik MA (2009) Can constitutions be of use in the resolution of secessionist conflicts. J Int Law Int Rel 5(2):59–87Google Scholar
  17. Keating M (2012) Rethinking sovereignty. Independence-lite, devolution-max and national accommodation. Revista d’Estudis Federals i Autonomics 16:9–29Google Scholar
  18. Keating M (2015) The Scottish independence referendum and after. Revista d’Estudis Federals i Autonomics 21:73–98Google Scholar
  19. Kellner P (2013) EU referendum: provincial England versus London and the Celts. YouGov. Available at: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/03/24/eu-referendum-provincial-england-versus-london-and/
  20. McHarg A (2014a) Further devolution and the unionists’ credibility gap. Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog. Available at: http://www.scottishconstitutionalfutures.org/OpinionandAnalysis/ViewBlogPost/tabid/1767/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3261/Aileen-McHarg-Further-Devolution-and-the-Unionists-Credibility-Gap.aspx
  21. McHarg A (2014c) The referendum: memorandum agreement and draft section 30 order. Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog. Available at: http://www.scottishconstitutionalfutures.org/OpinionandAnalysis/ViewBlogPost/tabid/1767/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/340/Aileen-McHarg-The-Referendum-Memorandum-of-Agreement-and-Draft-Section-30-Order.aspx
  22. Macnab S (2016a) Nicola Sturgeon: ‘I will win case for independence’. The Scotsman. Available at: http://www.scotsman.com/news/nicola-sturgeon-i-will-win-case-for-independence-1-4105616
  23. Macnab S (2016b) Nicola Sturgeon: Brexit will make Indyref2 ‘highliy likely’. The Scotsman. Available at: http://www.scotsman.com/news/nicola-sturgeon-brexit-will-make-indyref-2-highly-likely-1-4109114
  24. Merrilees I (2014) Excluding Scotland from the EU: definitely difficult; probably impossible. Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog. Available at: http://www.scottishconstitutionalfutures.org/OpinionandAnalysis/ViewBlogPost/tabid/1767/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/4234/Ian-Merrilees-Excluding-Scotland-from-the-EU-Definitely-Difficult-Probably-Impossible.aspx
  25. Ormston R, Curtice J (2013) The option not on the table. Attitudes to more devolution. Scotcen Social Research. Available at: http://www.scotcen.org.uk/media/205479/the-option-not-on-the-table-final.pdf
  26. Parliament of Catalonia (2013) Resolution 5/X of the Parliament of Catalonia, adopting the Declaration of sovereignty and of the right to decide of the people of Catalonia. Available at: http://www.parlament.cat/document/intrade/7176
  27. Remirez C (2014) Rajoy: ‘Mientras yo sea presidente del Gobierno, ni se celebrará ese referéndum ilegal ni se fragmentará España. Que quede claro’. El Mundo. Available at: http://www.elmundo.es/espana/2014/01/25/52e3a247e2704e964f8b4570.html
  28. Ridoch L (2013) Uncertainty is a starting point too. The Scotsman. Available at: http://www.scotsman.com/news/lesley-riddoch-uncertainty-is-a-starting-point-too-1-2968882
  29. Scottish Conservatives (2014) Commission on the Future Goverment of Scotland. Available at: http://www.scottishconservatives.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Strathclyde_Commission_14.pdf
  30. Scottish Executive (2007) Choosing Scotland’s future – a national conversation. Available at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/08/13103747/0
  31. Scottish Government (2009) Your Scotland your voice. Available at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/11/26155932/0
  32. Scottish Government (2010) Scotland’s future: draft referendum (Scotland) Bill Consultation Paper. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/resource/doc/303348/0095138.pdf
  33. Scottish Government (2012) Your Scotland, your referendum. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0038/00386122.pdf
  34. Scottish Government (2013a) Scotland’s future: from the referendum to independence and a written constitution. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0041/00413757.pdf
  35. Scottish Government (2013b) Scotland’s future. Your guide to an independent Scotland. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2013/11/9348
  36. Scottish Labour (2014) Powers for a purpose. Strengthening accountability and empowering people. Available at: https://b.3cdn.net/scotlab/c07a7cdb97a522f4c5_h1m6vwh8l.pdf
  37. Scottish Liberal Democrats (2014) Campbell II. The second report of the home and community rule commission. Available at: http://worldofstuart.excellentcontent.com/repository/CampbellIIreport.pdf
  38. Swanson I (2013) Is Salmond only offering us independence-lite? The Scotsman. Available at: http://www.scotsman.com/news/ian-swanson-is-salmond-only-offering-us-independence-lite-1-2948858
  39. The Electoral Commission (2013) Referendum on independence for Scotland: advice of the Electoral Commission on the Proposed Referendum Question. Available at: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/153691/Referendum-on-independence-for-Scotland-our-advice-on-referendum-question.pdf
  40. Tierney S (2004) Constitutional law and national pluralism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 392 ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Tierney S (2007) ‘We the Peoples’: constituent power and constitutionalism in plurinational states. In: Loughlin M, Walker N (eds) The paradox of constitutionalism: constituent power and constitutional form. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 229–246Google Scholar
  42. Tierney S (2012) Constitutional referendums. The theory and practice of republican deliberation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 352 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tierney S (2013a) Legal issues surrounding the referendum on independence for Scotland. Eur Constit Law Rev 3:359–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tierney S (2013b) The multi-option referendum: international guidelines, international practice and practical issues. Edinburgh Law School Research Paper Series. No 2013/33. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2328076
  45. Tierney S (2014) ‘And the winner is… .the Referendum’: Scottish Independence and he Deliberative Participation of Citizens. Int’l J Const L Blog. Available at: http://www.iconnectblog.com/2014/09/and-the-winner-is-the-referendum-scottish-independence-and-the-deliberative-participation-of-citizens/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+I-CONnect+%28I-CONnect+Blog%29
  46. Tierney S (2015a) Direct democracy in the United Kingdom: reflections from the Scottish independence referendum. Public Law (4):633–651Google Scholar
  47. Tierney S (2015b) Sovereignty and crimea: how referendum democracy complicates constituent power in multinational societies. Ger Law J 16(3):523–541Google Scholar
  48. Tomkins A (2012) The Scottish parliament and the independence referendum. UK Constitutional Law Blog. Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2012/01/12/adam-tomkins-the-scottish-parliament-and-the-independence-referendum/
  49. Trench A (2013) Scottish independence: does taking a sterling currency union off the table change the game? UK Constitutional Law Association Blog. Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/02/13/scottish-independence-does-taking-a-sterling-currency-union-off-the-table-change-the-game/
  50. UK Government (2013) Scotland analysis: devolution and the implications of Scottish independence. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scotland-analysis-devolution-and-the-implications-of-scottish-independence
  51. UK Government (2014) Scottish independence referendum: statement by the Prime Minister. Prime Minister’s Office. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/scottish-independence-referendum-statement-by-the-prime-minister
  52. UK Government and Scottish Government (2012) Agreement between the United Kingdom Government and the Scottish Government on a referendum on independence for Scotland. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/Government/concordats/Referendum-on-independence
  53. Vintro J (2012) Legality and the referendum on independence in Catalonia. Blog del IDP. Available at: http://idpbarcelona.net/docs/blog/legality_referendum.pdf
  54. Walker N (2013) Scotland’s constitutional future: interdependent independence or independent interdependence. Edinburgh Law School Research Paper Series. No 2013/05. Available at: http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/14644690/Walker_N_Scotland_s_Constitutional_Future.pdf
  55. Walker N (2015) Beyond secession? Law in the framing of the national polity. In: Tierney S (ed) Nationalism and globalisation. Hart, Oxford, pp 155–185Google Scholar
  56. Whitaker A (2014) Independence: Juncker ‘sympathetic’to Scots EU bid. The Scotsman. Available at: http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/independence-juncker-sympathetic-to-scots-eu-bid-1-3482266

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edinburgh Law SchoolEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations