Advertisement

Examining the Relationship Between Discrimination and Disengagement

  • Sarah Pass
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Explorations in Workplace Stigma book series (PAEWS)

Abstract

The MacLeod Review (2009) propelled the concept of employee engagement into the consciousness of organisations globally. Findings from the review highlighted the positive links between employee engagement and organisational outcomes. The review also emphasised the high number of disengaged employees working in the UK. Although the issue of disengagement is clearly a significant problem, we know little about what factors lead to disengagement. Exploring this issue, the chapter examines the literature on disengagement and perceptions of discrimination and incivility, and considers the role the line manager plays in this equation.

References

  1. Aktouf, O. 1992. Management and theories of organisations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? The Academy of Management Review 17: 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfes, K., C. Truss, E.C. Soane, C. Rees, and M. Gatenby. 2010. Creating an engaged workforce: Findings from the Kingston employee engagement consortium project. http://www2.cipd.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/DD66E557-DB90-4F07-8198-87C3876F3371/0/Creating_engaged_workforce.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.
  3. ———. 2013. The relationship between line manager behavior, perceived HRM practices, and individual performance: Examining the mediating role of engagement. Human Resource Management 52 (6): 839–859.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, D.G., L.M. Shore., and R.W. Griffeth. 2003. The role of perceived organisational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management 29: 99–118.Google Scholar
  5. Avolio, B.J., W.L. Gardner, F.O. Walumbwa, F. Luthans, and D.R. May. 2004. Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly 15: 801–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakker, A., and W. Schaufeli. 2008. Positive organisational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organisations. Journal of Organisational Behavior 29 (2): 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakker, A.B., W.B. Schaufeli, M. Leiter, and T. Taris. 2008. Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress 22: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, S. 2004. Getting engaged. HR Magazine 49: 44–51.Google Scholar
  9. Batt, R. 2002. Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal 45: 587–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bayl-Smith, P.H., and B. Griffin. 2014. Age discrimination in the workplace: Identifying as a late-career worker and its relationship with engagement and intended retirement age. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 44: 588–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blessing White. 2008. The state of employee engagement – Highlights for UK and Ireland. Skillman: Blessing White.Google Scholar
  12. Blizzard, R. 2004. Engagement vs satisfaction among hospital teams. Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing. The Gallup Organisation.Google Scholar
  13. Crawford, E.R., B. Rich, B. Buckman, and J. Bergeron. 2013. The antecedents and drivers of employee engagement. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. J. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 57–81. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Demerouti, E., and R. Cropanzano. 2010. From thought to action: Employee work engagement and job performance. In Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, ed. A. Bakker and M. Leiter, 147–163. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eisenberger, R., R. Huntington, S. Hutchinson, and D. Sowa. 1986. Perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher, L., and D. Robinson. 2013. Measuring and understanding engagement. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 2657–2669. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, C., and L. Harris. 2005. Easy to say, difficult to do: Diversity management in retail. Human Resource Management Journal 15: 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank, F.D., R. Finnegan, and C.R. Taylor. 2004. The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human Resource Planning 27: 12–25.Google Scholar
  19. Freeney, Y., and M. Fellenz. 2013. Work engagement, job design and the role of the social context at work: Exploring antecedents from a relational perspective. Human Relations 66: 1427–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallup. 2004. Human sigma: A meta-analysis. Washington, DC: Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/101956/humansigma-metaanalysisrelationship-between-employee-engag.aspx. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  21. Gallup. 2006. Gallup study: Engaged employees inspire company innovation: National survey finds that passionate workers are most likely to drive organisations forward. http://gmj.gallup.com/content/24880/Gallup-Study-Engaged-EmployeesInspire-Company.aspx. Accessed 27 Jan 2017.
  22. Guest, D. 2013. Employee engagement fashionable fad or long-term fixture? In Employee engagement fashionable fad or long-term fixture? ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 221–250. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Halbesleben, J. 2010. A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources and consequences. In Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, ed. A. Bakker and M. Leiter, 102–117. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Halbesleben, J., and A. Wheeler. 2008. The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work and Stress 22: 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hales, C. 2005. Rooted in supervision, branching into management: Continuity and change in the role of first-line manager. Journal of Management Studies 42: 471–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hallberg, U., and W. Schaufeli. 2006. “Same same” but different? European Psychologist 11: 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison, D.A., D.A. Newman, and P. Roth. 2006. How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal 49: 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harter, J.K., F.L. Schmidt, and T. Hayes. 2002. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holbeche, L., and N. Springett. 2003. In search of meaning at work. 1st ed. Horsham: Roffey Park Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Jenkins, S., and R. Delbridge. 2013. Context matters: Examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to employee engagement in two workplaces. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24: 2670–2691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, J.R., and J. Harter. 2005. Race effects on the employee engagement-turnover intention relationship. Journal of Leadership & Organisational Studies 11: 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahn, W. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal 33: 692–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kahn, W.A., and E. Heaphy. 2013. Relational contexts of personal engagement at work. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 82–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Kane-Frieder, R.E., W.A. Hochwarter, and G.R. Ferris. 2013. Terms of engagement: Political boundaries of work engagement–work outcomes relationships. Human Relations 67: 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keenoy, T. 2013. Engagement: A murmuration of objects. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 197–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Kelliher, C., V. Hope-Hailey, and E. Farndale. 2013. Employee engagement in multi-national organisations. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 180–195. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Khilji, S.E., and X. Wang. 2006. ‘Intended’ and ‘implemented’ HRM: The missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 17: 1171–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kular, S., C. Gatenby, C. Rees, E. Soane, and K. Truss. 2008. Employee engagement: A literature review. Kingston University. http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/4192/1/19wempen.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2017.
  39. Kuvaas, B. 2008. An exploration of how the employee? Organisation relationship affects the linkage between perception of developmental human resource practices and employee outcomes. Journal of Management Studies 45: 1–25.Google Scholar
  40. Kuvaas, B., A. Dysvik, and R. Buch. 2014. Antecedents and employee outcomes of line managers’ perceptions of enabling HR practices. Journal of Management Studies 51: 845–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Macey, W.H., and P. Schneider. 2008. The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organisational Psychology 1: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacIntosh, J. 2012. Workplace bullying influences women’s engagement in the workforce. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 33: 762–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacLeod, D., and N. Clarke. 2009. Engaging for success: Enhancing performance through employee engagement a report to government. http://engageforsuccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/file52215.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  44. MacLeod, D., and N. Clarke. 2014. The evidence: Wellbeing and employee engagement. http://engageforsuccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/wellbeing-and-engagement-04June2014-Final.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  45. Masson, R., M. Royal, T. Agnew, and S. Fine. 2008. Leveraging employee engagement: The practical implication. Industrial and Organisational Psychology 1: 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maxwell, G.A. 2004. Minority report. Employee Relations 26: 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. May, D., R. Gilson, and L. Harter. 2004. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology 77: 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Messarra, L.C. 2014. Religious diversity at work: The perceptual effects of religious discrimination on employee engagement and commitment. Contemporary Management Research 10: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Noon, M., and E. Ogbonna. 2001. Equality, diversity and disadvantage in employment. 1st ed. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearson, C.M., and C.L. Porath. 2005. On the nature, consequences and remedies of workplace incivility: No time for “nice”? Think again. Academy of Management Perspectives 19: 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. ———. 2009. The cost of bad behavior: How incivility damages your business and what you can do about it. 1st ed. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar
  52. Pearson, C.M., L.M. Andersson, and C.L. Porath. 2000. Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organisational Dynamics 29: 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Porath, C.L., and C.M. Pearson. 2010. The cost of bad behavior. Organisational Dynamics 39: 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Porath, C.L., and C.M. Pearson. 2012. Emotional and behavioral responses to workplace incivility and the impact of hierarchical status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42: E326–E357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Purcell, J. 2012. Voice and participation in the modern workplace: Challenges and prospects. http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/g/7/Voice_and_Participation_in_the_Modern_Workplace_challenges_and_prospects.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  56. Purcell, J. 2013. Employee voice and engagement. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 236–250. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 2014. Disengaging from engagement. Human Resource Management Journal 24: 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Purcell, J., and S. Hutchinson. 2007. Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal 17: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Purcell, J., N. Kinnie, N. Hutchinson, B. Rayton, and J. Swart. 2003. Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.Google Scholar
  60. Purcell, J., N. Kinnie, J. Swart, B. Rayton, and S. Hutchinson. 2009. People management and performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Rayton, B., T. Dodge, and G. D’Analeze. 2012. The evidence: Employee engagement task force “nailing the evidence” work group. Engage for success. http://www.engageforsuccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/The-Evidence.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  62. Rees, C., K. Alfes, and M. Gatenby. 2013. Employee voice and engagement: Connections and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24: 2780–2798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reio, T.G., and J. Sanders-Reio. 2011. Thinking about workplace engagement: Does supervisor and coworker incivility really matter? Advances in Developing Human Resources 13: 462–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Riketta, M. 2008. The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson, D., and S. Hayday. 2009. The engaging manager. Institute of Employment Studies. http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/resource/engaging-manager. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  66. Robinson, D., P. Perryman, and S. Hayday. 2004. The drivers of employee engagement. Institute of Employment Studies. http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/resource/drivers-employee-engagement. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  67. Robinson, D., H. Hooker, and S. Hayday. 2007. Engagement: The continuing story. http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/447.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  68. Saks, A.M. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21: 600–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Salanova, M., S. Agut, and J.M. Peiro. 2005. Linking organisational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 1217–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schaufeli, W.B. 2013. What is engagement? In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 15–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Schaufeli, W.B., and A.B. Bakker. 2004. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organisational Behavior 25: 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schaufeli, W.B., I.M. Martinez, A. Pinto, M. Salanova, and A. Bakker. 2002. Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33: 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Settoon, R.P., N. Bennett, and R. Liden. 1996. Social exchange in organisations: Perceived organisational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shantz, A., K. Alfes, C. Truss, and E. Soane. 2013. The role of employee engagement in the relationship between job design and task performance, citizenship and deviant behaviours. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24: 2608–2627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shuck, B. 2011. Integrative literature review: Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review 10: 304–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sia, S.K., B.C. Sahoo, and P. Duari. 2015. Gender discrimination and work engagement: Moderating role of future time perspective. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management 2: 58–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Soane, E. 2013. Leadership and employee engagement. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 99–115. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Sparrow, P. 2013. Strategic HRM and employee engagement. In Employee engagement in theory and practice, ed. C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, and A. Shantz, 99–115. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Taris, T.W., S. Geurts, W. Schaufeli, R. Blonk, and S. Lagerveld. 2008. All day and all of the night: The relative contribution of two dimensions of workaholism to well-being in self-employed workers. Work & Stress 22: 153–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Torkelson, E., K. Holm, and M. Bäckström. 2016. Workplace incivility in a Swedish context. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 6: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Towers Perrin. 2006. Ten steps to creating an engaged workforce: Key European findings. Towers Perrin HR Services. http://wcats.co.za/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/Ten-steps-to-creating-an-engaged-workforce.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
  82. Truss, C., A. Shantz, E. Soane, K. Alfes, and R. Delbridge. 2013. Employee engagement organisational performance and individual well-being: Exploring the evidence, developing the theory. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24: 2657–2669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weiss, D.C. 2008. Meatpacker prayer dispute among rising complaints. American Bar Association Journal. http://www.abajournal.com/mobile/article/meatpacker_prayer_dispute_among_rising_complaints_of_religious_bias/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  84. Whittaker, S., and M. Marchington. 2003. Devolving HR responsibility to the line. Employee Relations 25: 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Winkler, S., C. König, and M. Kleinmann. 2012. New insights into an old debate: Investigating the temporal sequence of commitment and performance at the business unit level. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology 85: 503–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wollard, K.K. 2011. Quiet desperation. Advances in Developing Human Resources 13: 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wright, P.M., G. McMahan, G. Snell, and B. Gerhart. 2001. Comparing line and HR executives’ perceptions of HR effectiveness: Services, roles, and contributions. Human Resource Management 40: 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Xanthopoulou, D., A. Bakker, E. Demerouti, and W. Schaufeli. 2009. Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior 74: 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yalabik, Z., P. Popaitoon, J. Chowne, and B. Rayton. 2013. Work engagement as a mediator between employee attitudes and outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24: 2799–2823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Yeung, A., and B. Griffin. 2008. Workplace incivility: Does it matter in Asia? People & Strategy 31: 14–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Pass
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Resource ManagementNottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations