Advertisement

Fostering Creative Engagement Through the Use of Collaborative Visual Mapping

  • Regina Rowland
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership book series (PASTLEFO)

Abstract

Collaborative visual mapping is proposed in this chapter as a vehicle for exposing and exchanging individual and culturally engrained assumptions, beliefs, and values as a foundation for self-organizing and negotiating distributed leadership (DL) relationships in diverse groups. Findings gained from a transdisciplinary case study suggest that one should focus on emerging interrelationships between group members (not the people themselves) as well as the interrelationships between the chosen roles members take on (not the roles themselves). It was shown that hierarchies in leadership and followership are constructed and dismantled during creative group engagement, shared and exchanged, and guided by the shifting dynamics in diverse groups (the whole gestalt), not by individual actors (as would be the case in traditional leadership practice). Key findings yield six recommendations for curating DL: using creative engagement to reveal the capacities of all group members, engaging group members creatively to stimulate flow states, expanding from binary to multipositional models of leadership and followership, optimizing group diversity, encouraging the celebration of diverse perspectives, and exposing the patterns of emerging interrelationships among group members through visual mapping.

Keywords

Collaborative visual mapping Creative engagement Self-organization Contextuality Interrelationships 

References

  1. Barry, A. M. (1997). Visual intelligence. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, D. (2013). Biomimicry handbook (vol. 3, p. 8). Missoula, MT: Biomimicry.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, M. J. (1986a). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, M. J. (1986b). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. Michael Paige (Ed.), Cross-cultural orientation: New conceptualizations and applications (pp. 21–72). New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, M. J. (2003). Developing intercultural competence: A reader. Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, M. J. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. In J. Wurzel (Ed.), Toward multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education (2nd ed.pp. 62–77). Newton, MA: Intercultural Resource.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, M. J., & Hammer, M. R. (2002). The intercultural development inventory: Administrator’s manual. Portland, OR: IDI.Google Scholar
  9. Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry. New York: HarperCollins Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.Google Scholar
  11. de Bono, E. (1985, 1999). Six thinking hats. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  12. Diller, J. V., & Moule, J. (2005). Cultural competence. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  13. Drexler, A., & Sibbet, D. (2004). 10.1 TPModel. San Francisco: Grove Consultants.Google Scholar
  14. Eagleton, T. (2000). The idea of culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrenfeld, J. R., & Hoffman, A. J. (2013). Flourishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Forrester, R., & Drexler, A. (2005). Forrest/Drexler team performance indicator guide to interpreting the results. San Francisco: Grove Consultants.Google Scholar
  17. Frontlist Books. (n.d.). Interview with Vijay Prashad. Retrieved from http://www.frontlist.com/interview/PrashadInterview
  18. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gudykunst, W. B., Lee, C. M., Nishida, T., & Ogawa, N. (2005). Theorizing about intercultural communication. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 3–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Hammer, M. R., & Bennett, M. J. (2002). Intercultural development inventory (IDI) manual (2nd ed.). Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. (n.d.). Geert Hofstede cultural dimensions. Retrieved from http://www.geert-hofstede.com
  24. Horn, R. E. (1998). Visual language. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU.Google Scholar
  25. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Mansour, J., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. (2005). Joining together. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  27. Kelley, R. (1999). People in me “So, what are you?” ColorLines Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=30&ItemID=3865
  28. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Kureishi, H. (2005, August 4). The carnival of culture: Multiculturalism has to be a robust exchange of ideas, rather than of festivals and food. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/aug/04/religion.uk
  30. Lewis, J. (2002). From culturalism to transculturalism [Electronic version]. Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, 1. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/~ijcs/issueone/lewis.htm
  31. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). Geography of thought. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Orwell, G. (1944). As I please. Retrieved from http://www.orwelltoday.com/orwellwarwritten.shtml
  33. Pearce, B. W. (1999). Research reports and theory development. Retrieved from http://www.pearceassociates.com/essays/research_menu.htm
  34. Pearce, B. W. (2005). The coordinated management of meaning (CMM). In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 35–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peterson, B. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  37. Purser, R. E., & Montuori, A. (1994). Miles Davis in the classroom: Using the jazz ensemble metaphor for enhancing team learning. Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rowland, R. (2009). Mapping the co-construction of meaning. Köln, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Russell, M. J. (2013). Thrivability. Devon, UK: Triarchy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Tseng, T. (2003, January). Transculturalism and the future of ethnic marketing. Retrieved from http://www.newamericandimensions.com/transculturalism.html
  43. VisualsSpeak. (2006). VisualsSpeak image set [brochure]. Portland, OR: VisualsSpeak.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina Rowland
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences BurgenlandEisenstadtAustria

Personalised recommendations