Advertisement

Investigating the Dynamism of Change in Leadership Identity

  • Koen Marichal
  • Jesse Segers
  • Karen Wouters
  • Jeroen Stouten
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership book series (PASTLEFO)

Abstract

Through an in-depth study of an extreme case, we examined how the identity of vertical leaders was impacted by the distribution of leadership and the implementation of shared leadership within teams in a bureaucratic organization. We conclude that these leaders experienced identity threat and engaged in protecting and restructuring identity work. This process is determined by the leaders’ overall identity management, the strength of their vertical leader identity, and the organization’s sense-giving and sense-breaking practices. Only a few leaders arrive at developing an adapted leader identity, which we call “shared.” This conclusion is especially relevant for bureaucratic organizations which aim to engage in distributed leadership (DL) and rely on their formal, hierarchical leaders to realize that ambition. The study advances our understanding of vertical leadership at the identity level and its role in enhancing DL. Moreover, we answer the call for more in-depth, qualitative leadership research.

Keywords

Distributed leadership Shared leadership Identity work Leadership identity Leadership development 

References

  1. Aime, F., Humphrey, S., Derue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 327–352. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M. (1996). Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation. Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), 455–485. doi: 10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90002-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. In A. P. Brief & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (vol. 30, pp. 55–89). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Andersson, T. (2012). Normative identity processes in managers’ personal development training. Personnel Review, 41(5–6), 572–589. doi: 10.1108/00483481211249111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational-change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681–703. doi: 10.1177/001872679304600601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beech, N. (2008). On the nature of dialogic identity work. Organization, 15(1), 51–74. doi: 10.1177/1350508407084485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beech, N. (2011). Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human Relations, 64(2), 285–302. doi: 10.1177/0018726710371235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boeije, H. (2012). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. Denken en doen. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  12. Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, A. D., & Coupland, C. (2015). Identity threats, identity work and elite professionals. Organization Studies, 36(10), 1315–1336. doi: 10.1177/0170840615593594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burke, C. S., DiazGranados, D., & Salas, E. (2011). Team leadership: A review and look ahead. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 338–351). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Caldwell, S. D., Herold, D. A., & Fedor, D. B. (2004). Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: A cross-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 868–882. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, J. D., Assanand, S., & Di Paula, A. (2003). The structure of the self-concept and its relation to psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality, 71(1), 115–140. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.t01-1-00002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll, B., & Levy, L. (2010). Leadership development as identity construction. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 211–231. doi: 10.1177/0893318909358725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carroll, B., & Nicholson, H. (2014). Resistance and struggle in leadership development. Human Relations, 67(11), 1413–1436. doi: 10.1177/0018726714521644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chan, K. Y., & Drasgow, F. (2001). Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 481–498. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 331–346. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman, P. T. (2004). Implicit theories of organizational power and priming effects on managerial power-sharing decisions: An experimental study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 297–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02549.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Colman, K., De Caluwé, M., Dendooven, K., & Van Landuyt, D. (2015). De naakte waarheid over zelfsturing. Leuven, Belgium: Lannoo Campus.Google Scholar
  24. Conger, J. (1998). Qualitative research as the cornerstone methodology for understanding leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 107–121. doi: 10.1016/s1048-9843(98)90044-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Conroy, S. A., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2014). Letting go and moving on: Work-related identity loss and recovery. Academy of Management Review, 39(1), 67–87. doi: 10.5465/amr.2011.0396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cox, J., Pearce, C., & Perry, M. (2003). Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process: How shared leadership can enhance new product development team dynamics and effectiveness. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership. Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 48–76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Day, D., Fleenor, J., Atwater, L., Sturm, R., & McKee, R. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Day, D., Harrison, M., & Halpin, S. (2009). An integrative approach to leader development. Connecting adult development, identity and expertise. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Dweck, C. S., Hong, Y. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (1993). Implicit theories: Individual-differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(5), 644–656. doi: 10.1177/0146167293195015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case-study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi: 10.2307/258557.Google Scholar
  31. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000244976900004.Google Scholar
  32. Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858–881. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005.
  33. Fitzsimons, D., James, K. T., & Denyer, D. (2011). Alternative approaches for studying shared and distributed leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 313–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2370.2011.00312.x.
  34. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Galinsky, A., Jordan, J., & Sivanathan, N. (2008). Harnessing power to capture leadership. In C. Hoyt, G. Goethals, & D. Forsyth (Eds.), Leadership at the crossroads: Leadership and psychology (vol. 1, pp. 283–299). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. doi: 10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00120-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hay, A. (2014). ‘I don’t know what I am doing!’: Surfacing struggles of managerial identity work. Management Learning, 45(5), 509–524. doi: 10.1177/1350507613483421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198. doi: 10.1111/peps.12108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Horton, K. E., Bayerl, P. S., & Jacobs, G. (2014). Identity conflicts at work: An integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, S6–S22. doi: 10.1002/Job.1893.
  40. Ibarra, H., & Barbulescu, R. (2010). Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 135–154. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000273460300007.Google Scholar
  41. Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D. (2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 500–528. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000245465400012.Google Scholar
  42. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kreiner, G. E., & Sheep, M. (2009). Growing pains & gains: Framing identity dynamics as opportunities for identity growth. In L. Roberts & J. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations. Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 23–46). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  44. Länsisalmi, H., Peiró, J.-M., & Kivimäki, M. (2004). Grounded theory in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 242–255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Locke, E. A. (2003). Starting at the top. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership. Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 271–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lord, R., & Hall, R. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill. Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 591–615. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mabey, C. (2013). Leadership development in organizations: Multiple discourses and diverse practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 359–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00344.x.Google Scholar
  48. Magni, M., & Maruping, L. M. (2013). Sink or swim: Empowering leadership and overload in teams’ ability to deal with the unexpected. Human Resource Management, 52(5), 715–739. doi: 10.1002/Hrm.21561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marichal, K., & Geens, G. (2015, April). In gedeeld leiderschap nemen teams de lead. HR Magazine, 18–21.Google Scholar
  50. Marr, J. C., & Thau, S. (2014). Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: How initial status position influences performance after status loss. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 223–248. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maurer, T., & London, M. (2015). From individual contributor to leader: A role identity shift framework for leader development within innovative organisations. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206315614372.
  52. Mills, P. K., & Ungson, G. R. (2003). Reassessing the limits of structural empowerment: Organizational constitution and trust as controls. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 143–153. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000180314700010.Google Scholar
  53. Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.26.3.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2012). Self-identity threat and resistance to change: Evidence from regular travel behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 318–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nicholson, H., & Carroll, B. (2013). Identity undoing and power relations in leadership development. Human Relations, 66(9), 1225–1248. doi: 10.1177/0018726712469548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pearce, C. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47–57. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000220265400005.Google Scholar
  57. Pearce, C., Conger, J., & Locke, E. (2007). Shared leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pearce, C., Hoch, J., Jeppesen, H., & Wegge, J. (2010). New forms of management shared and distributed leadership in organizations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(4), 151–153. doi: 10.1027/1866–5888/A000022.
  59. Pearce, C., & Manz, C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self- and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pearce, C., & Sims, H. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 6(2), 172–197. doi: 10.1037//1089-2699.6.2.172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pearce, C., Sims, H., Cox, J., Ball, G., Schnell, E., Smith, K., & Trevino, L. (2002). Transactors, transformers and beyond. A multi-method development of a theoretical typology of leadership. Journal of Management Development, 22(4), 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Petriglieri, G., & Petriglieri, J. (2010). Identity workspaces: The case of business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 44–60. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000276783500004.Google Scholar
  63. Petriglieri, G., & Stein, M. (2012). The unwanted self: Projective identification in Leaders’ identity work. Organization Studies, 33(9), 1217–1235. doi: 10.1177/0170840612448158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Petriglieri, J. (2011). Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 641–662. doi: 10.5465/amr.2009.0087.Google Scholar
  65. Pilarska, A., & Suchanska, A. (2015). Self-complexity and self-concept differentiation – What have we been measuring for the past 30 years? Current Psychology, 34(4), 723–743. doi: 10.1007/s12144-014-9285-7.
  66. Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235–262. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000237198600007.Google Scholar
  67. Ramarajan, L. (2014). Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward an intrapersonal network approach. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 589–659. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2014.912379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., & Sintemaartensdijk, N. (2009). Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1075–1092. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless – The verbal Construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1336–1371. doi: 10.1086/228668.
  70. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. doi: 10.2307/2695870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2013). Mastering one’s destiny: Mastery goals promote challenge and success despite social identity threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 748–762. doi: 10.1177/0146167213481067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297. doi: 10.2307/2695840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thorpe, R., Gold, J., & Lawler, J. (2011). Locating distributed leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 239–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00303.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. doi: 10.1177/0149206310380462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van Dijk, R., & van Dick, R. (2009). Navigating organizational change: Change leaders, employee resistance and work-based identities. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Voronov, M., & Yorks, L. (2015). “Did you notice that?” Theorizing differences in the capacity to apprehend institutional contradictions. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 563–586. doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wassenaar, C. L., & Pearce, C. (2012). The nature of shared leadership. In D. Day & J. Antonakis (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 363–389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koen Marichal
    • 1
  • Jesse Segers
    • 2
  • Karen Wouters
    • 3
  • Jeroen Stouten
    • 4
  1. 1.Antwerp Management SchoolAntwerp, Flanders SynergyLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Antwerp Management SchoolUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.Antwerp Management SchoolFlanders SynergyLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations