Advertisement

Leadership and Resource Allocation in Schools: Applying Micropolitical Perspectives

  • Chad R. Lochmiller
  • Colleen R. Pawlicki
Chapter

Abstract

Resource allocation represents a compelling leadership quandary for school principals across the United States. Reduced school funding necessitates actively rethinking existing resource allocation decisions within schools. This rethinking often produces micropolitical challenges with school staff. Drawing upon qualitative data, this chapter invites readers to consider the micropolitical challenges found in three common resource allocation quandaries that principals often address in their leadership. These quandaries include the reassignment of classroom teachers to better support student learning, the reallocation of school-based resources to support new school improvement priorities, and the challenges associated with preparing staff for an impending reduction in school resources. The chapter concludes by providing reflective questions aimed at supporting the reader’s professional growth and furthering the development of their leadership platform.

Keywords

School principals Resource allocation Micropolitics Learning improvement 

References

  1. Baker, B. D. (2014). Evaluating the recession’s impact on state school finance systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(91), 1–30.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1991). Micropolitics of radical change: Budgets, management, and control in British schools. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 19–45). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, P. C. (1996). Governing education: Public sector reform or privatization. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (1999). In search of politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, N., & Wilkie, R. (1973). Structural conflict in school organization. In Decision-making in British education. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Björk, L. G., & Blase, J. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(3), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blase, J. (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blase, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349–378.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, K. M., & Wynn, S. R. (2009). Finding, supporting, and keeping: The role of the principal in teacher retention issues. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen-Vogel, L. (2007). Allocating quality: Collective bargaining agreements and administrative discretion over teacher assignment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 433–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croninger, R. G., & Malen, B. (2002). The role of school governance in the creation of school community. In K. A. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 281–320). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairholm, G. W. (2009). Organizational power politics: Tactics in organizational leadership (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC.Google Scholar
  16. Fine, M. (1993). Parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94(4), 682–729.Google Scholar
  17. Goldhaber, D. D., Brewer, D. J., & Anderson, D. J. (1999). A three-way error components analysis of educational productivity. Education Economics, 7(3), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guarino, C. M., Santibanez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guthrie, J. W., & Peng, A. (2011). A warning for all who would listen – America’s public schools face a forthcoming fiscal tsunami. In F. M. Hess & E. Osberg (Eds.), Stretching the school dollar: How schools can save money while serving students best (pp. 19–44). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  20. Halverson, T. J., & Plecki, M. L. (2015). Exploring the politics of differential resource allocation: Implications for policy design and leadership practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(1), 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Handler, J. F. (1998). Chicago school reform: Enablement or empowerment? The Good Society, 8(2), 9–14.Google Scholar
  22. Hanushek, E. A. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 84–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lochmiller, C. R. (2010). Human resource support for school principals in two, urban school districts: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  25. Lochmiller, C. R. (2012). Leading with less: Principal leadership in austere times. In B. G. Barnett, A. R. Shoho, & A. K. Tooms (Eds.), The changing nature of instructional leadership in the 21st century (pp. 163–184). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Malen, B. (1995). The micropolitics of education: Mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school politics. In J. D. Scribner & D. H. Layton (Eds.), The study of education politics (pp. 147–168). Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  27. Malen, B., & Cochran, M. V. (2008). Beyond pluralistic patterns of power: Research on the micropolitics of schools. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 148–178). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Mawhinney, H. B. (1999). Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of studying the micropolitics of leadership in reforming schools. School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayer, A. P., Donaldson, M. L., LeChasseur, K., Welton, A. D., & Cobb, C. D. (2013). Negotiating site-based management and expanded teacher decision making: A case study of six urban schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 695–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monk, D. H. (1987). Assigning elementary pupils to their teachers. Elementary School Journal, 88(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders 2015. Reston: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org
  32. Odden, A. R. (2011). Strategic management of human capital in education: Improving instructional practice and student learning in schools. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Odden, A., Monk, D., Nakib, Y., & Picus, L. (1995). The story of the education dollar. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(2), 161.Google Scholar
  34. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  35. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pfeffer, J., & Salancick, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  37. Plecki, M. L. (2000). Money isn’t everything: Teaching school finance in a leadership development program. Journal of School Leadership, 10(6), 542–560.Google Scholar
  38. Plecki, M. L., & Knapp, M. S. (2014). Frameworks and strategies for investing in instructional leadership. In M. S. Knapp, M. I. Honig, M. L. Plecki, B. S. Portin, & M. A. Copland (Eds.), Learning-focused leadership in action: Improving instruction in schools and districts (pp. 123–152). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Plecki, M. L., Alejano, C. R., Knapp, M. S., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2006). Allocating resources and creating incentives to improve teaching and learning. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar
  40. Plecki, M. L., Knapp, M. S., Castenada, T., Halverson, T., LaSota, R., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2009). How leaders invest staffing resources for learning improvement. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved from http://www.ctpweb.org
  41. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roza, M. (2010). Educational economics: Where do school funds go? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Rubenstein, R., Schwartz, A. E., Stiefel, L., & Amor, H. B. H. (2007). From districts to schools: The distribution of resources across schools in big city school districts. Economics of Education Review, 26(5), 532–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wong, K. K. (1999). Funding public schools: Politics and policies. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chad R. Lochmiller
    • 1
  • Colleen R. Pawlicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations