Advertisement

Age Management in Organizations: The Perspective of Middle-Aged Employees

  • Pia Heilmann
Chapter

Abstract

The study in this chapter contributes to the discussion of extending careers in ageing societies. The discussion of career extension has mainly focused on the older workforce and how to extend careers at the tail end. The Finnish baby boomer generation (born 1945–1949) is large (390,000 in 2010, Statistics Finland); every fifth Finnish citizen is at least 65 years old. Because of the sustainable economy in the future it is important to delay their retirement. Another popular approach to the discussion of extending careers is from the younger generations’ (generations Y and Z) viewpoint. However, there seems to be little discussion of the career extension objectives of the currently middle-aged workforce. This study examines the relationship between the career extension for Finnish middle-aged people and work well-being. It is arguable that objectives to prolong Finnish people’s careers should be recognized for the whole career and that career extension action should be directed at middle-aged employees. Many of the methods for prolonging careers relate to human resource management (HRM) practices. Increasing work well-being has an effect on the career extension desires of individuals. For example, a range of flexible work arrangements and opportunities for further education in middle age can promote a career extension. Therefore, age management practices can be understood as coming under the remit of human resource management practices. The key question is how human resource practices are applied to the age context. The qualitative research data includes 48 accounts gathered from middle-aged Finnish adult working students.

Keywords

Middle age Age management Career extension Work well-being HRM Finland 

References

  1. Aaltio, I., Salminen, H. M., & Koponen, S. (2014). Aging employees and human resource management – Evidence of gender-sensitivity? Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 33(2), 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arsenault, P. (2004). Validating generational differences. A legitimate diversity and leadership issue. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(2), 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The boundaryless career. A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arthur, M. B., Hall, D. T., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Handbook of career theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bal, P. M., De Jong, S. B., Jansen, P. G. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Motivating employees to work beyond retirement: A multilevel study of the role of ideals and climate. Journal of Management Studies, 49(2), 306–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barley, S. R. (1989). Careers identities, and institutions: The legacy of the Chicago School of Sociology. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 41–65). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beardwell, J., & Claydon, T. (2007). Human resource management. A contemporary approach (5th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and human resource management. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Canduela, J., Dutton, M., Johnston, S., Lindsay, C., McQuaid, R. W., & Raeside, R. (2012). Aging, skills and participation in work-related training in Britain: Assessing the position of older workers. Work, Employment and Society, 26(1), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cascio, W. F. (2007). Trends, paradoxes, and some directions for research in career Studies. In H. Gunz & M. Peiperl (Eds.), Handbook of career studies (pp. 549–557). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crampton, S. M., & Hodge, J. W. (2009). Generation Y: Uncharted territory. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 7(4), 1–6.Google Scholar
  13. De Hauw, S. and De Vos, A. (2010). Millennials’ career perspective and psychological contract expectations: Does the recession lead to lowered expectations? Journal of Business Psychology, 25(2), 293–302.Google Scholar
  14. Deal, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2010). Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 34–38.Google Scholar
  15. Dufva, H. (2012). On the threshold of retirement. A multi-level study of the retirement phenomenon (Dissertations in social sciences and business studies, No. 35). University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2007). European age management network: The way forward? Preliminary research and analysis. Brussels: GHK Consulting ltd for the European Commission EQUAL – European Social Fund. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.Google Scholar
  17. Flynn, M. (2010). Who would delay retirement? Typologies of older workers. Personnel Review, 39(3), 308–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuertes, V., Egdell, V., & McQuaid, R. (2013). Extending working lives: Age management in SMEs. Employee Relations, 35(3), 272–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant, A. M., Christianson, M. K., & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being Tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guest, D. (2002). Human resource management, corporate performance and employee well-being: Building the worker into HRM. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halme, P. (2011). Iästä johtamiseen. Ikäjohtaminen ja eri-ikäisyys tutkimuskohteena. [From age to management. Age management and different ages in research] (Doctoral dissertation).Jyväskylä University Printing House, Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  22. Ilmarinen, J. (2006). Towards a longer worklife – Aging and the quality of worklife in the European Union. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health and Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.Google Scholar
  23. Ilmarinen, J. (2014). Mitä on työkyky? http://www.ttl.fi/fi/tyohyvinvointi/tykytoiminta/mita_on_tyokyky/Sivut/default.aspx [Online, cited 20 April 2016].
  24. Jack, R. (2004). How to implement a wellness strategy, people management guide to wellness at work. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  25. Kanter, R. M. (1992). When giants learn to dance. Mastering the challenges of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G., & Oxenbridge, S. (2006). Inside the workplace: Findings from the 2004 workplace employment relations survey. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  27. Kooij, D. T. A. M., Guest, D. D., Clinton, M., Knight, T., Jansen, P. G. W., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2013). How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(1), 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kultalahti, S. (2015). “It’s so nice to be at work!” Adopting different perspectives in understanding Generation Y at work. Acta Wasaensia 339.Google Scholar
  29. Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19, 699–727.Google Scholar
  30. Loretto, W. (2010). Work and retirement in an aging world: The case of older workers in the UK. Twenty-first Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 5(3), 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Midtsundstad, T.I. (2011). Inclusive workplaces and older employees: An analysis of companies’ investment in retaining senior workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(6), 1277–1293.Google Scholar
  32. Mirvis, P. H., & Hall, D. T. (1994). Psychological success and the Boundaryless career. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 15, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrisette, R., Schellenberg, G., & Silver, C. (2004). Retaining older workers. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 5, 15–20.Google Scholar
  34. Naegele, G., & Walker, A. (2006). A guide to good practice in age management. Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  35. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2009). Fundamentals of human resource management. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, Irwin.Google Scholar
  36. Peccei, R. (2004). Human resource management and the search for the happy workplace. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management/School of Management, Rotterdam School of Economics.Google Scholar
  37. Pitts, D. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction and performance: Evidence from U.S. federal. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schulte, P., & Vainio, H. (2010). Well-being at work – Overview and perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 36(5), 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simström, H. (2009). Tunneälytaidot ikäjohtamisessa. Esimiehen tunneälytaidot ja niiden tärkeys kuntahenkilöstön arvioimana. Akateeminen väitöskirja. Tampereen yliopisto. Kasvatustieteen laitos. Tampereen Yliopistopaino – Juvenes Print.Google Scholar
  40. Sintonen, T. (2008). Diversiteetti ja narratiivisuus. Tutkielmia diskurssivisesta organisaatiotodellisuudesta [Diversity and narratives. Essays on discoursive reality of the organization] (Doctoral dissertation). Studies in Business and Economics 64, Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  41. Solnet, D., Kralj, A., & Kandampully, J. (2012). Generation Y as hospitality employees: An examination of work attitudes differences. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 17(3), 36–54.Google Scholar
  42. Tienari, J., & Piekkari, R. (2011). Z ja epäjohtaminen. Talentum: Helsinki.Google Scholar
  43. Torrington, D., Hall, L., Taylor, S., & Atkinson, C. (2011). Human resource management (8th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. United Nations. (2012). Population, aging and development 2012 [Online, cited 17 Feb 2017]. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/2012PopAgeingandDev_WallChart.pdf.
  45. Vaahtio, E.-L. (2002). Recruitment, age and ageism. Työpoliittinen tutkimus nro 244 Työministeriö.Google Scholar
  46. Väänänen-Tomppo, I. (2010). Jotta jaksaisi ja jatkaisi työssä mahdollisimman pitkään [To be able to continue for a long time in work]. In E.Tuominen, M. Takala, & P. Forma (Eds.), Työolot ja työssä jatkaminen [Work conditions and continuing in work]. Eläketurvakeskuksen tutkimuksia 2.Google Scholar
  47. Warr, P. B. (1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  48. Warr, P. (2002). Psychology at work. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pia Heilmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Lappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations