Advertisement

Metal Allergy pp 495-506 | Cite as

Metal Allergy in Children

  • Chandler Rundle
  • Nikoleta Brankov
  • Sharon E. Jacob
Chapter

Abstract

Metals are significant provocateurs of allergic contact dermatitis in children. Skin barrier defects due to filaggrin gene mutations confer an increased risk of expression of atopic dermatitis, a potential for increased absorption of metals across a defective barrier, and a risk for contact sensitization to metals, particularly nickel. This chapter discusses the complex interplay of environmental and intrinsic factors with respect to metal contact sensitization in children.

References

  1. 1.
    Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL, Feldman SR, Hanifin JM, Simpson EL, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Feb;70(2):338–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacob SE, Goldenberg A, Nedorost S, Thyssen JP, Fonacier L, Spiewak R. Flexural eczema versus atopic dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2015;26(3):109–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rundle CW, Bergman D, Goldenberg A, Jacob SE. Contact dermatitis considerations in the atopic dermatitis patient. Clin Dermatol. 2017;35(4):367–74.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thyssen JP, Carlsen BC, Menné T. Nickel sensitization, hand eczema, and loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene. Dermatitis. 2008;19(6):303–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boguniewicz M, Leung DY. Atopic dermatitis: a disease of altered skin barrier and immune dysregulation. Immunol Rev. 2011;242(1):233–46.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen H, Common J, Haines R, Balakrishnan A, et al. Wide spectrum of filaggrin-null mutations in atopic dermatitis highlights differences between Singaporean Chinese and European populations. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(1):106–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nikolovski J, Stamatas GN, Kollias N, Wiegand BC. Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Investig Dermatol. 2008;128(7):1728–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ross-Hansen K, Østergaard O, Tanassi JT, et al. Filaggrin is a predominant member of the denaturation-resistant nickel-binding proteome of human epidermis. J Investig Dermatol. 2014;134(4):1164–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Halling-Overgaard A-S, Kezic S, Jakasa I, Engebretsen K, Maibach H, Thyssen J. Skin absorption through atopic dermatitis skin: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15065.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruber R, Elias PM, Crumrine D, Lin TK, Brandner JM, Hachem JP, Presland RB, Fleckman P, Janecke AR, Sandilands A, et al. Filaggrin genotype in ichthyosis vulgaris predicts abnormalities in epidermal structure and function. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:2252–63.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panther D, Jacob S. The importance of acidification in atopic eczema: an underexplored avenue for treatment. JCM. 2015;4(5):970–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elias PM, Schmuth M. Abnormal skin barrier in the etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9(5):437–46.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakatsuji T, Chen TH, Two AM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus exploits epidermal barrier defects in atopic dermatitis to trigger cytokine expression. J Investig Dermatol. 2016;136(11):2192–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rippke F, Schreiner V, Doering T, Maibach HI. Stratum corneum pH in atopic dermatitis: impact on skin barrier function and colonization with Staphylococcus Aureus. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5(4):217–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao G, Usui ML, Lippman SI, James GA, Stewart PS, Fleckman P, Olerud JE. Biofilms and inflammation in chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013;2(7):389–99.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gonzalez H, Jensen TE. Nickel sequestering by polyphosphate bodies in Staphylococcus aureus. Microbios. 1998;93(376):179–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacob SE, Goldenberg A, Pelletier JL, Fonacier LS, Usatine R, Silverberg N. Nickel allergy and our children’s health: a review of indexed cases and a view of future prevention. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015;32(6):779–85.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldenberg A, Admani S, Pelletier JL, Jacob SE. Belt buckles-increasing awareness of nickel exposure in children: a case report. Pediatrics. 2015;136(3):e691–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thyssen JP, Maibach HI. Nickel release from earrings purchased in the United States: the San Francisco earring study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(6):1000–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thyssen JP, Menné T, Johansen JD. Nickel release from inexpensive jewelry and hair clasps purchased in an EU country - are consumers sufficiently protected from nickel exposure? Sci Total Environ. 2009;407(20):5315–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Le Coz C-J, Leclere J-M, Arnoult E, Raison-Peyron N, Pons-Guiraud A, Vigan M. Allergic contact dermatitis from shellac in mascara and eye shadows. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46:149–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Torjussen W, Zachariasen H, Andersen I. Cigarette smoking and nickel exposure. J Environ Monit. 2003;5(2):198–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gawkrodger D. Nickel-plated steel coins: the risk to the nickel-allergic public needs wider consideration. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68(6):321–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ansari R, Kazi TG, Jamali MK, Arain MB, Sherazi ST, Jalbani N, Afridi HI. Improved extraction method for the determination of iron, copper, and nickel in new varieties of sunflower oil by atomic absorption spectroscopy. J AOAC Int. 2008;91(2):400–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Admani S, Matiz C, Jacob SE. Nickel allergy—a potential cause of razor dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2014;31(3):392–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jensen P, et al. Nickel may be released from laptop computers. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67(6):384–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gioacchino M, et al. Nickel oral hyposensitization in patients with systemic nickel allergy syndrome. Ann Med. 2013;46(1):31–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Quenan S, Pasche F, Piletta P. “ET” material allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2014;25(5):275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fréling E, et al. Occupational contact dermatitis caused by nickel in scratchcards. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(6):371–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sarantis, H., Malkan, S., Archer, L. Pretty scary. Could Halloween face paint cause lifelong health problems? A Report on Heavy Metals in Face Paints by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. 20 November 2014. 2009. http://www.safecosmetics.org/downloads/PrettyScary_Oct2709.pdf
  31. 31.
    Mislankar M, Zirwas M. Low-nickel diet scoring system for systemic nickel allergy. Dermatitis. 2013;24(4):190.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schalock P, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants—diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(1):4–19.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Al-Dhabi NA. Heavy metal analysis in commercial Spirulina products for human consumption. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2013;20(4):383–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldenberg A, et al. Nickel allergy in adults in the US: 1962 to 2015. Dermatitis. 2015;26(5):216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kamerud K, et al. Stainless steel leaches nickel and chromium into foods during cooking. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(39):9495–501.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Midander K, et al. Nickel release from white gold. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;7(12):109–11.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hamann D, Scheman AJ, Jacob SE. Nickel exposure from keys: alternatives for protection and prevention. Dermatitis. 2013;24(4):186Y189.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thyssen J, Johansen J, Jellesen M, Møller P, Sloth J, Zachariae C, Menné T. Consumer leather exposure: an unrecognized cause of cobalt sensitization. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(5):276–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hamann C, Hamann D, Hamann K, Thyssen J. Cobalt release from inexpensive earrings from Thailand and China. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(4):238–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jakobsen S, Lidén C, Søballe K, Johansen J, Menné T, Lundgren L, Bregnbak D, Møller P, Jellesen M, Thyssen J. Failure of total hip implants: metals and metal release in 52 cases. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71(6):319–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    James J, Warin R. Sensitivity to cyanocobalamin and hydroxocobalamin. Br Med J. 1971;2(5756):262.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brendlinger D, Tarsitano J. Generalized dermatitis due to sensitivity to a chrome cobalt removable partial denture. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970;81(2):392–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oh JE, Lee HJ, Choi YW, Choi HY, Byun JY. Metal allergy in eyelid dermatitis and the evaluation of metal contents in eye shadows. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(9):1518–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fischer T, Rystedt I. Cobalt allergy in hard metal workers. Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9(2):115–21.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kickinger-Lörsch A, Bruckner T, Mahler V. Nickel and cobalt release from metal alloys of tools—a current analysis in Germany. Contact dermatitis. 2015;73(5):289–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thyssen J, Menné T, Lidén C, Julander A, Jensen P, Jakobsen S, Søballe K, Gotfredsen K, Jellesen M, Johansen J. Cobalt release from implants and consumer items and characteristics of cobalt sensitized patients with dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(3):113–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Walsh G, Wilkinson M. Materials and allergens within spectacle frames: a review. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(3):130–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Bank clerk’s occupational allergic nickel and cobalt contact dermatitis from coins. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38(4):217–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Midander K, Hurtig A, Tornberg A, Julander A. Allergy risks with laptop computers – Nickel and cobalt release. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(6):353–9.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fregert S, Gruvberger B. Blue and black pottery as a potential source of cobalt. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;10(1):50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wahlberg JE, Lindstedt G, Einarsson O. Chromium, cobalt and nickel in Swedish cement, detergents, mould and cutting oils. Berufsdermatosen. 1977;25(6):220–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Guarneri F, Guarneri C, Cannavò S. Nail-art and cobalt allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62(5):320–1.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jacob S, Castanedo-Tardan M, Blyumin M. Inflammation in green (chromium) tattoos during patch testing. Dermatitis. 2008;19(5):E33–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stuckert J, Nedorost S. Low-cobalt diet for dyshidrotic eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59(6):361–5.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vilaplana J, Grimalt F, Romaguera C, Mascaro JM. Cobalt content of household cleaning product. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18(4):254–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hamann D, et al. The impact of common metal allergens in daily devices. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;13(5):525–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Al Jabbari YS. Physico-mechanical properties and prosthodontic applications of co-Cr dental alloys: a review of the literature. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(2):138–45.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sharma AD. Low chromate diet in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54(3):293–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Richardson C, Hamann CR, Hamann D, Thyssen JP. Mobile phone dermatitis in children and adults: a review of the literature. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2014;27(2):60–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hedberg YS, Lidén C, Odnevall Wallinder I. Chromium released from leather – I: exposure conditions that govern the release of chromium(III) and chromium(VI). Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72(4):206–15.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tariba B. Metals in wine—impact on wine quality and health outcomes. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2011;144:143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Brandão M, et al. Contact sensitivity to metals (chromium, cobalt and nickel) in childhood. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87(2):269–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bizzotto N, et al. Chromium-induced diffuse dermatitis with lymph node involvement resulting from Langerhans cell histiocytosis after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:1633–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    De Marchi S, Cecchin E, de Marchi SU. Systemic allergic dermatitis resulting from oral administration of chromium with a food supplement. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70:123–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hedberg YS, et al. Severe occupational chromium allergy despite cement legislation. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70:321–3.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gress J, et al. Cleaning-induced arsenic mobilization and chromium oxidation from CCA-wood deck: potential risk to children. Environ Int. 2015;82:35–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Thyssen JP, et al. Allergic chromium dermatitis from wearing ‘chromium-free’ footwear. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70:185–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Abboud F, Scalliet P, Vynckier S. An experimental palladium-103 seed (OptiSeedexp) in a biocompatible polymer without a gold marker: characterization of dosimetric parameters including the interseed effect. Med Phys. 2008;35(12):5841–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kielhorn J, Melber C, Keller D, Mangelsdorf I. Palladium—a review of exposure and effects to human health. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002;205(6):417–32.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM, Jacob DJ, Pirrone N. Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(10):4967–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Barret JR. Rice is a significant source of methylmercury: research in china assesses exposures. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(9):a398.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Xu J, Bravo AG, Lagerkvist A, Bertilsson S, et al. Sources and remediation techniques for mercury contaminated soil. Environ Int. 2015;74:42–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Alvarez-Chavez CR, Federico-Perez RA, Gomez-Alvarez A, Velazquez-Contreras LE, Perez-Rios R. Hidden sources of mercury in clinical laboratories. Environ Monit Assess. 2014;186(9):5393–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cadmium toxicity. Agency for toxic substances and disease registry. 2008. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/csem.asp?csem=6&po=5
  75. 75.
    Hutton M. Sources of cadmium in the environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1983;7(1):9–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Adams SV, Newcomb PA, Shafer MM, Atkinson C, Bowles EJ, Newton KM, Lampe JW. Sources of cadmium exposure among healthy premenopausal women. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409(9):1632–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Badmaev V, Prakash S, Majeed M. Vanadium: a review of its potential role in the fight against diabetes. J Altern Complement Med. 1999;5(3):273–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Morgenstern V, Zutavern A, Cyrys J, Brockow I, et al. Atopic diseases, allergic sensitization, and exposure to traffic-related air pollution in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(12):1331–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Rehder D. Vanadium. Its role for humans. Met Ions Life Sci. 2013;13:139–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hankinson DJ. Potential sources of copper contamination of farm milk supplies measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J Dairy Sci. 1975;58(3):326–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ma J, Betts NM. Zinc and copper intakes and their major food sources for older adults in the 1994–96 continuing survey of food intakes by individuals (CSFII). J Nutr. 2000;130(11):2838–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    National Center for biotechnology information. PubChem compound database; CID = 23,978. 2018, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/23978
  83. 83.
    Ravindra K, Bencs L, van Grieken R. Platinum group elements in the environment and their health risk. Sci Total Environ. 2004;318(1–3):1–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kümmerer K, Helmers E, Hubner P, Mascart G, Milandri M, Reinthaler F, Zwakenberg M. European hospitals as a source for platinum in the environment in comparison with other sources. Sci Total Environ. 1999;225(1–2):155–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bruze M, Edman B, Björkner B, Möller H. Clinical relevance of contact allergy to gold sodium thiosulfate. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31(4):579–83.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Fung MC, Bowen DL. Silver products for medical indications: risk-benefit assessment. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1996;34(1):119–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tugulea AM, Bérubé D, Giddings M, Lemieux F, Hnatiw J, Priem J, Avramescu ML. Nano-silver in drinking water and drinking water sources: stability and influences on disinfection by-product formation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014;21(20):11823–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jacob SE, Goldenberg A, Silverberg N, Fonacier L, et al. Nickel-induced allergic dermatitis: a call for U.S. policy aimed at “Goblin’s copper”. Consult Pediatr. 2015;14(6):252–7.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gambichler T, Boms S, Freitag M. Contact dermatitis and other skin conditions in instrumental musicians. BMC Dermatol. 2004;4:3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Jensen P, Hamann D, Hamann CR, Jellesen MS, Jacob SE, Thyssen JP. Nickel and cobalt release from Children’s toys purchased in Denmark and the United States. Dermatitis. 2014;25(6):356–65.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Overgaard LEK, Engebretsen KA, Jensen P, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP. Nickel released from children’s toys is deposited on the skin. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(6):380–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Huber A, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL, Bäurle G, Hornstein OP. Occurrence of contact allergies in atopic eczema. Relation to simultaneously detected atopic markers. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1987;35(4):119–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Andersen R, Thyssen J, Maibach H. Qualitative vs. quantitative atopic dermatitis criteria - in historical and present perspectives. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;30(4):604–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Pistoor FH, Kapsenberg ML, Bos JD, Meinardi MM, Mary B, Blomberg EV, Scheper RJ. Cross-reactivity of human nickel-reactive T-lymphocyte clones with copper and palladium. J Investig Dermatol. 1995;105(1):92–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Minang JT, Areström I, Troye-Blomberg M, Lundelberg L, et al. Nickel, cobalt, chromium, palladium and gold induce a mixed Th1-and Th2-type cytokine response in vitro in subjects with contact allergy to the respective metals. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006;146(3):417–26.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Goldenberg A, Mousdicas N, Silverberg N, Powell D, Pelletier JL, Silverberg JI, Jacob SE. Pediatric contact dermatitis registry inaugural case data. Dermatitis. 2016;27(5):293–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Wahlberg J. Cross-reactivity patterns of cobalt and nickel studied with repeated open applications (ROATs) to the skin of guinea pigs. Am J Contact Dermat. 2000;11(1):42–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Jacob SE, Amado A. Focus on T.R.U.E. Test allergen #4: chromates. Skin & Aging. 2005;13(11):21–23.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Reduta T, Bacharewicz J, Pawłoś A. Patch test results in patients with allergic contact dermatitis in the Podlasie region. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2013;30(6):350–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Weston WL, Weston JA. Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Am J Dis Child. 1984;138:932–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Mortz CG, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children and adolescents. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:121–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Boscolo P, Di Giampaolo L, Reale M, Castellani ML, et al. Different effects of platinum, palladium, and rhodium salts on lymphocyte proliferate and cytokine release. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2004;34(3):299–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Durosaro O, el-Azhary RA. A 10-year retrospective study on palladium sensitivity. Dermatitis. 2009;20(4):208–13.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Kuljanac I, Knežević E, Cvitanović H. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2011;19(2):91–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Audicana MT, Muñoz D, Pozo MD, Fernández E, Gastaminza G, Corres LF. Allergic contact dermatitis from mercury antiseptics and derivatives: study protocol of tolerance to intramuscular injections of thimerosal. Am J Contact Dermat. 2002;13(1):3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Moller H. Intradermal testing in doubtful cases of contact allergy to metals. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;20:120–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Grandjean P, Poulsen LK, Heilmann CC, et al. Allergy and sensitization during childhood associated with prenatal and lactational exposure to marine pollutants. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(10):1429–33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Kim JH, Jeong KS, Ha EH, et al. Association between prenatal exposure to cadmium and atopic dermatitis in infancy. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(4):516–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Sarasua SM, Vogt RF, Henderson LO, et al. Serum immunoglobulins and lymphocyte subset distributions in children and adults living in communities assessed for lead and cadmium exposure. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2000;60(1):1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ritz B, Heinrich J, Wjst M, Wichmann E, Krause C. Effect of cadmium body burden on immune response of school children. Arch Environ Health: Int J. 1998;53(4):272–80.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Correa da Rosa J, Malajian D, Shemer A, Rozenblit M, Dhingra N, Czarnowicki T, Khattri S, Ungar B, Finney R, Xu H, et al. Patients with atopic dermatitis have attenuated and distinct contact hypersensitivity responses to common allergens in skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(3):712–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wöhrl S. Copper allergy revisited. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(6):863–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Walker-Smith PK, Keith DJ, Kennedy CT, Sansom JE. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by copper. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75(3):186–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kind F, Bircher A. Multiple contact sensitizations to metals including iron in a patient with occupational hand dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63:26.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Hamann C, Hamann D, Goodacre C, et al. Metal allergy possible sensitization cause in dental personnel. Dermatitis. 2012;23:134–45.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Makrilia N, Syrigou E, Kaklamanos I, Manolopoulos L, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions associated with platinum antineoplastic agents: a systematic review. Metal-Based Drugs. 2010;2010:1–11.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lafay-Cousin L, Sung L, Carret AS, Hukin J, Wilson B, Johnston DL, Zelcer S, Silva M, Odame I, Mpofu C, Strother D, Bouffet E. Carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction in pediatric patients with low-grade glioma: a Canadian pediatric brain tumor consortium experience. Cancer. 2008;112(4):892–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Yu DY, Dahl GV, Shames RS, Fisher PG. Weekly dosing of carboplatin increases risk of allergy in children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;23(6):349–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Zug KA, Pham AK, Belsito DV, Dekoven JG, Deleo VA, Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ. Patch testing in children from 2005 to 2012. Dermatitis. 2014;25(6):345–55.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Zug KA, McGinley-Smith D, Warshaw EM, et al. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American contact dermatitis group data, 2001–2004. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(10):1329–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Hammonds LM, Hall VC, Yiannias JA. Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48(3):271–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Burmester GR. Molecular mechanisms of action of gold in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis—an update. Z Rheumatol. 2001;60(3):167–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Svensson Å, Möller H, Björkner B, Bruze M, Leden I, Theander J, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis, gold therapy, contact allergy and blood cytokines. BMC Dermatol. 2002;2(1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Jøhnke H, Norberg LA, Vach W, Bindslev-Jensen C, Høst A, Andersen KE. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51(3):141–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Mortz CG, Kjaer HF, Eller E, et al. Positive nickel patch tests in infants are of low clinical relevance and rarely reproducible. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013;24(1):84–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Schaeffer AC, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C, Mortz CG. The reproducibility of nickel, cobalt, and chromate sensitization in patients tested at least twice in the period 1992–2014 with TRUE test®. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75(2):111–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Fisher AA. Childhood allergic contact dermatitis. Cutis. 1975;15:635–42.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Thestrup-Pedersen K. Atopic eczema. What has caused the epidemic in industrialized countries and can early intervention modify the natural history of atopic eczema? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2003;2:202–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Jacob SE, Steele T, Brod B, Crawford GH. Dispelling the myths behind pediatric patch testing-experience from our tertiary care patch testing centers. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25(3):296–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chandler Rundle
    • 1
  • Nikoleta Brankov
    • 2
  • Sharon E. Jacob
    • 3
  1. 1.School of MedicineLoma Linda UniversityLoma LindaUSA
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyEastern Virginia Medical SchoolNorfolkUSA
  3. 3.Department of DermatologyLoma LindaUSA

Personalised recommendations