Anatomical Dissection for Adhesions

  • Ricardo Z. AbdallaEmail author
  • Danniel Frade Said


Surgical adhesions are well known in reoperations, but they are found in virgin abdomens as well. They could be strong, well-adapted bridges or loose attachments between very active organs and strand structures. Going into the peritoneal cavity could cause problems for the surgeon even for well-trained professionals. Whether one is choosing open, video, or robotic-assisted surgery, caution in accessing the cavity must be considered. This chapter favors the use of robotic instruments to remove adhesions from the anterior abdominal wall, under inflammatory conditions that give these adhesions the whole variety of presentations. Sometimes they are easy to dissect, but sometimes they are part of the wall with no evident dissection plan, with the scar completely attached to muscles, fascia, or hernia sac.

These different presentations are well evidenced, clearly presented, and better planned to be lysed if our tools can allow us stability, tremor control, detailed visualization, and comfort to work longer in difficult cases as robotic-assisted surgery can do.


Adhesions Adhesiolysis Pneumoperitoneum dissection Small bowel obstruction Laparoscopic hernioplasty Robot-assisted adhesiolysis Permanent scar Incarcerated hernia Attachments Reconstruction Entero fistulas Bowel suture 

Supplementary material

370050_1_En_10_MOESM1_ESM.wve (36 kb)
Video 10.1 (WVE 36 kb)
Video 10.2

(MP4 902 kb)

Video 10.3

(MP4 944 kb)

Video 10.4

(MP4 14616 kb)

Video 10.5

(MP4 992 kb)

Video 10.6

(MP4 930 kb)

Video 10.7

(MP4 903 kb)

Video 10.8

(MP4 899 kb)

Video 10.9

(MP4 899 kb)

Video 10.10

(MP4 910 kb)

Video 10.11

(MP4 902 kb)

Video 10.12

(MP4 907 kb)

Video 10.13

(MP4 904 kb)

Video 10.14

(MP4 903 kb)

Video 10.15

(MP4 906 kb)

Video 10.16

(MP4 906 kb)

Video 10.17

(MP4 917 kb)

Video 10.18

(MP4 907 kb)

Video 10.19

(MP4 1550663 kb)

Video 10.20

(MP4 1547158 kb)

Video 10.21

(MP4 430240 kb)


  1. 1.
    Saed GM, Diamond MP. Molecular characterization of postoperative adhesions: the adhesion phenotype. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(3):307–14. ReviewCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chegini N. Peritoneal molecular environment, adhesion formation and clinical implication. Front Biosci. 2002;7:e91–115. ReviewPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chegini N. TGF-beta system: the principal profibrotic mediator of peritoneal adhesion formation. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26(4):298–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(41):4545–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ichinose A, Takio K, Fujikawa K. Localization of the binding site of tissue-type plasminogen activator to fibrin. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:163–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Color Dis. 2007;9(Suppl 2):25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ott DE. Laparoscopy and adhesion formation, adhesions and laparoscopy. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26(4):322–30. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1082390. ReviewCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mais V. Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2014;20(17):4917–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norrman B, Wallén P, Rånby M. Fibrinolysis mediated by tissue plasminogen activator. Disclosure of a kinetic transition. Eur J Biochem. 1985;149:193–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cashman JD, Kennah E, Shuto A, Winternitz C, Springate CM. Fucoidan film safely inhibits surgical adhesions in a rat model. J Surg Res. 2011;171(2):495–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Pinna AD, World Society of Emergency Surgery. P.O.P.A. study: prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomy for adhesive small bowel obstruction. A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(2):382–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arung W, Drion P, Cheramy JP, Honoré P, Meurisse M, Defraigne JO, Detry O. Intraperitoneal adhesions after open or laparoscopic abdominal procedure: an experimental study in the rat. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(7):651–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hackenberg T, Mentula P, Leppäniemi A, Sallinen V. Propensity score-matched analysis. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis. Scand J Surg. 2017;106(1):28–33.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nordin A, Freedman J. Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: an analysis of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4454–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin H, Li J, Xie Z, Zhang W, Lv X. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction: a single-center retrospective case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26(3):244–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miron A, Giulea C, Nadragea M, Enciu O. The laparoscopic approach of small bowel obstruction – the experience of a primary center. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2016;111(2):126–30.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Binda MM, Molinas CR, Hansen P, Koninckx PR. Effect of desiccation and temperature during laparoscopy on adhesion formation in mice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:166–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martens TP, Morgan JA, Hefti MM, Brunacci DA, Cheema FH, Kesava SK, Xydas S, Dang NC, Vigilance DW, Kohmoto T, Gorenstein LA, Smith CR Jr, Argenziano M. Adhesiolysis is facilitated by robotic technology in reoperative cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(3):1103–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:1–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luciano DE, Roy G, Luciano AA. Adhesion reformation after laparoscopic adhesiolysis: where, what type, and in whom they are most likely to recur. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(1):44–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones N, Fleming ND, Nick AM, Munsell MF, Rallapalli V, Westin SN, Meyer LA, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, Soliman PT. Conversion from robotic surgery to laparotomy: a case-control study evaluating risk factors for conversion. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(2):238–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digestive Surgery Division, Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Sao Paulo School of MedicineSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Sao Paulo Cancer Institute at University of Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Medical School of ABCSanto AndréBrazil

Personalised recommendations