Advertisement

Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE)

  • Pieter C. van der Sluis
  • Jelle P. H. Ruurda
  • Sylvia van der Horst
  • Richard van HillegersbergEmail author
Chapter
  • 594 Downloads

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with occurrence rates varying greatly by geographic location [1]. The standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer with curative intent is multimodality treatment containing either preoperative chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy followed by open esophagectomy [2, 3]. However, the open transthoracic esophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality [4, 5].

Keywords

Robot Esophagectomy Thoracoscopy Lymphadenectomy 

Supplementary material

Video 11.1

Robot assisted esophageal resection (RAMIE) (MP4 655652 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(6):545–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boone J, Livestro DP, Elias SG, et al. International survey on esophageal cancer: part I surgical techniques. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(3):195–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(21):1662–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Omloo JMT, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JBF, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):992–1001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:135–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, et al. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(12):1845–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94(12):1461–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):197–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruurda JP, van Vroonhoven TJ, Broeders IA. Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:223–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1435–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boone J, Schipper ME, Moojen WA, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(8):878–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, van Hilllegersberg R. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:257–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, Borel Rinkes IH, Ten Kate FJ, van Hillegersberg R. Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1350–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang W, Fang C, Li J, Geng QT, Wang S, Kang F, et al. Single-dose, bilateral paravertebral block plus intravenous sufentanil analgesia in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: a safe and effective alternative. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28(4):966–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Hillegersberg R, Bleys RL. Topography and extent of pulmonary vagus nerve supply with respect to transthoracic oesophagectomy. J Anat. 2015;227(4):431–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van der Horst S, Bleys RL, et al. Preserving the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3816–22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4683-y. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naruke T, Tsuchiya R, Kondo H, et al. Lymph node sampling in lung cancer: how should it be done? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16(Suppl 1):S17–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boone J, Rinkes IH, van Hillegersberg R. Gastric conduit staple line after esophagectomy: to oversew or not? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:1491–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verhage RJ, Zandvoort HJ, ten Kate FJ, et al. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(6):919–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Verhage RJ, Siersema PD, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:872–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Rossum PS, Haverkamp L, Carvello M, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011;28:29–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Workum F, van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, de Wilt JH, Rosman C. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis. Dig Surg. 2014;31:95–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rosman C, Roig J, Scheepers JJ, Cuesta MA, Luyer MD, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Workum F, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):119–26. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Hawn MT. Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):90–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Inaba K, Kanaya S, Teramukai S, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg. 2012;36(7):1608–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, Chao J, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13(2):194–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Versteijne E, van Laarhoven HW, van Hooft JE, van Os RM, Geijsen ED, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Definitive chemoradiation for patients with inoperable and/or unresectable esophageal cancer: locoregional recurrence pattern. Dis Esophagus. 2015;28(5):453–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gkika E, Gauler T, Eberhardt W, Stahl M, Stuschke M, Pöttgen CI. Long-term results of definitive radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cancers of the cervical esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2014;27(7):678–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter C. van der Sluis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jelle P. H. Ruurda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sylvia van der Horst
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard van Hillegersberg
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgical OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations