Advertisement

(Re)turning to the Sacred Trails: (Re)storying Connections to More-than-Human Worlds in Outdoor Education

  • Kathryn Riley
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

The foundational purpose of Australian outdoor education is to explore the three-dimensional relationships between self, others, and the environment. However, implicated within the disciplining narratives of adventure hegemony, the type, depth, and quality of our relationship with the environment can become compromised. Using a political ecology in education approach, with posthumanist and ecofeminist perspectives, this chapter argues for a closer examination, and critique, of the taken-for-granted practices in outdoor education. The author suggests that in calling attention to the constraining hierarchies of discursive practices, there is opportunity for outdoor education to produce the conditions of possibility to include additional ways of knowing, thinking, being, and doing towards a moral inter-dependency and inter-connection with more-than-human worlds.

Keywords

Outdoor education Political ecology Posthumanism Ecofeminism Adventure hegemony 

References

  1. Alcoff, L. (1995). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. In N. Tuana & R. Tong (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy: Essential readings in theory, reinterpretation, and application (pp. 434–456). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  2. Ammary, S. (2008). “The road not taken” in Hemmingway’s “The snows of Kilimanjaro”. Connotations, 18(1–3), 123–138.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, K., & Perrin, C. (2015). New materialism and the stuff of humanism. Australian Humanities Review, 58, 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, M. J. (2005). Making (some) sense of feminist poststructuralism in environmental education research and practice. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 79–93.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, M. J. (2009). Beyond human-nature-spirit boundaries: Researching with animate Earth. PhD dissertation, University of Regina, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.porosity.ca
  7. Benton, T. (1996). The greening of Marxism. UK: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bergman, R. (2004). Caring for the ethical ideal: Nel Noddings on moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 33(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blenkinsop, S., & Egan, K. (2009). Three “big ideas” and environmental education. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, B. Heesoon, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Restoring culture, environment and education. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bowers, C. A. (2004). Comments on David Gruenewald’s, A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education. Toronto: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Braidotti, R. (2010). On putting the active back into activism. New Formations, 68(68), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. UK/USA: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Calvert-Minor, C. (2013). Epistemological misgivings of Karen Barad’s ‘posthumanism’. Journal of Human Studies—Springer Journals, 37, 123–137.Google Scholar
  14. Chagani, F. (2014). Critical political ecology and the seductions of posthumanism. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clayton, S., & Meyers, G. (2009). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Diehm, C. (2002). Arne Naess, Val Plumwood, and deep ecology subjectivity: A contribution to the deep ecology—Eco-feminist debate. Ethics and the Environment, 7(1), 24–38.Google Scholar
  18. Eder, K., & Ritter, M. T. (1996). The social construction of nature: A sociology of ecological enlightenment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Esbjorn-Hargens, S. (2010). Integral theory in service of enacting integral education: Illustrations from an online graduate program. In S. Esbjorn-Hargens, J. Reams, & O. Gunnlaugson (Eds.), Integral education: New directions for higher learning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fellner, A. M., Hamscha, S., Heissenberger, K., & Moos, K. J. (2014). Is it ‘cause it’s cool?: Affective encounters with American culture. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Ford, P. M. (1981). Principles and practices of outdoor/environmental education. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Frost, R. (1916). The Poetry Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/173536
  23. Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gough, A. (2013). Researching differently: Generating a gender agenda for research in environmental education. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Gray, T., & Martin, P. (2012). The role and place of outdoor education in the Australian national curriculum. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 16(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  26. Gruenewald, D. A. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socio-ecological challenge of the earth charter. The Educational Researcher, 34(1), 71–107.Google Scholar
  27. Gruenewald, D. A. (2008). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy on place. The Educational Researcher, 14(3), 308–324.Google Scholar
  28. Howell, N. R. (1997). Ecofeminism: What one needs to know. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 32(2), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Governing ‘eco-certified children’ through pastoral power: Critical perspectives on education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karpiak, I. E. (2010). Written in “three voices”: A turn toward integral higher education. In S. Esbjorn-Hargens, J. Reams, & O. Gunnlaugson (Eds.), Integral education: New directions for higher learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kirby, V., & Wilson, E. A. (2011). Feminist conversations with Vicki Kirby and Elizabeth A. Wilson. Feminist Theory, 12(2), 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). A political ecology of education in/for the Anthropocene. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 6, 128–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacGregor, S. (2004). From care to citizenship: Calling ecofeminism back to politics. Ethics and the Environment, 9(1), 56–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, P. (2007). Caring for the environment: Challenges from notions of caring. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 23, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, P. (2010). Outdoor education and the national curriculum in Australia. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 14(2), 3–11.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, P., & McCullagh, J. (2011). Physical education and outdoor education: Complimentary but discreet disciplines. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McInerney, P., Smyth, J., & Down, B. (2011). ‘Coming to a place near you?’ The politics and possibilities of a critical pedagogy of place-based education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKenzie, M. (2005). The ‘post-post period’ and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 11(4), 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McLaren, P. (2009). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Orr, D. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment and the human prospect. Washington, DC: First Island Press.Google Scholar
  42. Payne, P., & Wattchow, B. (2009). Phenomenological deconstruction, slow pedagogy, and the corporeal turn in wild environmental/outdoor education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 15–32.Google Scholar
  43. Powch, I. (1994). Wilderness therapy: What makes it empowering for women? Women and Therapy, 15(3–4), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riley, K. (2014). Narratives exploring earth-based spirituality for transformative outdoor and environmental studies. Masters Research dissertation, Deakin University, Australia.Google Scholar
  45. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Roszak, T. (2001). The voice of the earth: An exploration of eco-psychology. Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Russell, C. L., & Bell, A. C. (1996). Politicised ethic of care: Environmental education from an eco-feminist perspective. In K. Warren (Ed.), Women’s voices in experiential education (pp. 172–181). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  48. Snaza, N., Applelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., et al. (2014). Towards a posthumanist education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39–55.Google Scholar
  49. Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2014). Posthumanism and educational research [electronic resource]. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  50. Sonu, D., & Snaza, N. (2015). The fragility of ecological pedagogy: Elementary social studies standards and possibilities of new materialism. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 12(3), 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. St Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sund, L., & Öhman, J. (2014). On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology and methods. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Vance, L. (2001). Ecofeminism and wilderness. NWSA Journal, 9(3), 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Poeck, K., & Vandenabeele, J. (2013). Education and sustainability issues: An analysis of publics-in-the-making. In G. Biesta, M. De Bie, D. Wildemeersch (Eds.), Civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere (Chap. 14, pp. 195–211). Springer.Google Scholar
  57. White, P. (2013). Walking my talk as an intentional, embodied, (co)constructed environmental educator. PhD dissertation, University of Regina, Canada.Google Scholar
  58. Winter, D. D., & Koger, S. (2004). The psychology of environmental problems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  59. Zink, R. (2004). The work outdoor education does: A Foucauldian analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Otago, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Riley
    • 1
  1. 1.Deakin University AustraliaBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations