Advertisement

Difficulties in Laparoscopic Access

  • Hamdy M. IbrahimEmail author
  • Hani S. Shaaban
  • Ahmed Al-Kandari
  • Inderbir S. Gill
Chapter

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has developed rapidly over the last few years, and many surgical procedures formerly carried out through large abdominal incisions are now performed laparoscopically. Reduction of the trauma of access by avoidance of large wounds has been the driving force for such development [1]. However, the insertion of needles and trocars necessary for the pneumoperitoneum and the performance of the procedure are not without risk [2]. The technical modifications imposed by surgical laparoscopy are obvious (e.g., number and size of trocars, location of insertion sites, specimen retrieval), and therefore morbidity may be substantially modified. Complications such as retroperitoneal vascular injury, intestinal perforation, wound herniation, wound infection, abdominal wall hematoma, and trocar site mestastasis have been reported [3].

References

  1. 1.
    Cuschieri A. Minimal access surgery and the future of interventional laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 1991;161:404–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fitzgibbons RJ, Salerno GM, Filipi CJ. Open laparoscopy. In: Zucker KA, editor. Surgical Laparoscopy. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 1991. p. 87–97.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayol J, Garcia-Agular J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA. Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg. 1997;21:529–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pemberton JR, Tolley DA, Van Velthoven RF. Prevention and management of complications in urological laparoscopic port site placement. Eur Urol. 2006;50:958–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:478–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, Krummel TM, Way LW. Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:677–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L. Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:275–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E. Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study in 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:566–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antevil JL, Bhoyrul S, Brunson ME, Vierra MA, Swadia ND. Safe and rapid laparoscopic access—a new approach. World J Surg. 2005;29:800–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Godfrey C, Wahle GR, Schilder JM, Rothenberg JM, Hurd WW. Occult bladder injury during laparoscopy: report of two cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9:341–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hurd WW, Bude RO, DeLancey JO, Gauvin JM, Aisen AM. Abdominal wall characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The effect of obesity on the laparoscopic approach. J Reprod Med. 1991;36:473–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurd WW, Amesse LS, Gruber JS, Horowitz GM, Cha GM, Hurteau JA. Visualization of the bladder and epigastric vessels prior to trocar placement in diagnostic and operative laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:209–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shafer DM, Khajanchee Y, Wong J, Swanström LL. Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force and defect size. Surg Innov. 2006;13(3):183–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Bittner R. Laparoscopic surgery complications associated with trocar tip design: review of literature and own results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9:135–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Corson SL, Chandler JG, Way LW. Survey of laparoscopic entry injuries provoking litigation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:341–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ternamian AM. A trocarless, reusable, visual-access cannula for safer laparoscopy; an update. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998;5(2):197–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Al-Saleem T, Uzzo RG. Prior abdominal surgery and radiation do not complicate the retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney or adrenal gland. J Urol. 2005;174:446–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aron M, Desai MM, Rubenstein M, Gill I. Laparoscopic instrumentation. In: de la Rosette J, Gill I, editors. Laparoscopic urologic surgery in malignancies. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marcovich R, Del Terzo MA, Wolf JS Jr. Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques: Optiview visualizing trocar and Veress needle. J Endourol. 2000;14:175–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seifman BD, Dunn RL, Wolf JR. Transperitoneal laparoscopy into the previously operated abdomen: effect on operative time, length of stay and complications. J Urol. 2003;169:36–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Franc-Guimond J, Kryger J, González R. Experience with the Bailez technique for laparoscopic access in children. J Urol. 2003;170:936–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, Kumari NA. Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:763–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    String A, Berber E, Foroutani A, Macho JR, Pearl JM, Siperstein AE. Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:570–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grundsell H, Larsson G. A modified laparoscopic entry technique using a finger. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:509–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gersin KS, Heniford BT, Arca MJ, Ponsky JL. Alternative site entry for laparoscopy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998;8:125–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomas MA, Rha KH, Ong AM, et al. Optical access trocar injuries in urological laparoscopic surgery. J Urol. 2003;170:61–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ternamian AM. Laparoscopy without trocars. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:815–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharp HT, Dodson MK, Draper ML, Watts DA, Doucette RC, Hurd WW. Complications associated with optical-access laparoscopic trocars. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:553–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:707–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2, 407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol. 1999;162:765–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sung GT, Gill IS. Anatomic landmarks and time management during retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2002;16:165–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holtz G. Insufflation of the obese patient. In: Diamond MP, Corfman RS, DeCherney AH, editors. Complication of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. 2. ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1997. p. 22–5.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Preventive entry-related gynaecological laparoscopic injuries. Green-top Guideline 49. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/GT49PreventingLaparoscopicInjury2008.pdf. Published January 5, 2008. Accessed April 24, 2010.
  34. 34.
    Parsons JK, Jarrett TJ, Chow GK, Kavoussi LR. The effect of previous abdominal surgery on urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 2002;168:2387–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Audebert AJ, Gomel V. Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:631–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ibrahim HM, Al-Kandari AM, Taqi A, et al. Etiology and management of adult giant hydronephrosis. Arab J Urol. 2008;6(2):21–5.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guleria K, Manjusha SA. Near fatal haemoperitoneum of rare origin following laparoscopic sterilization. J Postgrad Med. 2001;47:143.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamdy M. Ibrahim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hani S. Shaaban
    • 2
  • Ahmed Al-Kandari
    • 3
  • Inderbir S. Gill
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of UrologyFayoum UniversityFayoumEgypt
  2. 2.Department of UrologyAhmadi HospitalAhmadiKuwait
  3. 3.Department of Surgery (Urology), Faculty of MedicineKuwait UniversityJabriyahKuwait
  4. 4.USC Institute of UrologyKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations