Advertisement

Difficulties in Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy

  • Rene J. Sotelo Noguera
  • Juan C. Astigueta Pérez
  • David Canes
Chapter

Abstract

Open surgical simple prostatectomy has traditionally been the treatment of choice for symptomatic benign enlargement of the prostate.1 In 1894, Eugene Fuller performed a series of suprapubic prostatic adenomectomies in New York city. Eleven years later, he published an investigative work entitled “The question of priority in the adoption of the method of total enucleation suprapubically of the hypertrophied prostate.”2 However, it was not until 1912 that, thanks to the results obtained by Peter Freyer, this approach was popularized using a technique consisting of enucleation of the prostatic adenoma through an extraperitoneal incision in the wall of the bladder. This surgical technique did not change until 30 years later when Terence Millin described his technique for a retropubic simple prostatectomy in 1945. Millin developed the innovative trans-capsular approach, which spared the bladder from unnecessary incisions. This avoided the morbidity and complications associated with the vesicotomy.3

References

  1. 1.
    Roehrborn CG, Bartsch G, Kirby R, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative, international overview. Urology. 2001;58(5):642-650.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fuller E. The question of priority in the adoption of the method of total enucleation suprapubically of the hypertrophied prostate. Ann Surg. 1905;41:520-534.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy: a new extravesical technique. Lancet. 1945;1:693-696. Report on 20 cases.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu-Yao GL, Barry MJ, Chang CH, Wasson JH, Wennberg JE, Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT). Transurethral resection of the prostate among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States: time trends and outcomes. Urology. 1994;44(5):692-698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McNicholas TA. Management of symptomatic BPH in the UK: who is treated and how? Eur Urol. 1999;36(Suppl 3):33-39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon N, Hadlow G, Knight E, Mohan P. Transurethral resection of the prostate: still the gold standard. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;67:354-357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuntz R, Lehrich K. Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transvesical open enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.: a randomized prospective trial of 120 patients. J Urol. 2002;168:1465-1469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    AUA Practice Guidelines Committee. AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2003;170:530-547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tubaro A, Vicentini R, Renzetti R, Miano L. Invasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities for lower urinary tract symptoms: what are the relevant differences in randomised controlled trials? Eur Urol. 2000;38(Suppl 1):7-17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moody JA, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.: comparison to open prostatectomy. J Urol. 2001;165:459-462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandhu JS, Ng C, Vanderbrink BA, Egan C, Kaplan SA, Te AE. High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate photoselective laser vaporization of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with large prostates. Urology. 2004;64:1155-1159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oesterling J. Retropubic and suprapubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell’s Urology, vol. 2. 7th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1998:1529-1540.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    de la Rosette J, Alivizatos G, Madersbacher S, et al. Guidelines on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. European Association of Urology; 2004. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/tx_eauguidelines/2004/Full/BPH_2004.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2010.
  14. 14.
    Sotelo R, Clavijo R. Open adenomectomy: past, present and future. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18(1):34-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefelli MV. Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2002;167:2528-2529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mariano MB, Tefilli MV, Graziottin TM, Pinto Morales CM, Goldraich IH. Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a six year experience. Eur Urol. 2006;49:127-132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Velthoven R, Peltier A, Laguna MP, Piechaud T. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy (Millin): pilot study on feasibility. Eur Urol. 2004;45:103-109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baumert H, Gholami SS, Bermúdez H, et al. Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;169(suppl):109 [abstract V423].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sotelo R, Spaliviero M, Garcia-Segui A, et al. Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;17:757-760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Porpiglia F, Renard J, Volpe A, et al. Laparoscopic transcapsular simple prostatectomy (Millin): an evolving procedure. J Urol. 2007;177(4 suppl):578 [abstract 1739].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blew BD, Fazio LM, Pace K, D’A Honey RJ. Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2005;12:2891-2894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rehman J, Khan SA, Sukkarieh T, Chughtai B, Waltzer WC. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy (adenomectomy) for obstructing benign prostatic hyperplasia: transvesical and transcapsular (Millin) techniques. J Endourol. 2005;19:491-496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rey D, Ducarme G, Hoepffner JL, Staerman F. Laparoscopic adenectomy: a novel technique for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2005;95:676-678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lufuma E, Gaston R, Piechaud T, et al. Finger assisted laparoscopic retropubic prostatectomy (Millin). Eur Urol Suppl. 2007;6(2):164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ngninkeu BN, de Fourmestreaux N, Lufuma E. Digitally-assisted laparoscopic prostatic adenomectomy: a preliminary report of 75 cases [abstract 1740]. J Urol. 2007;177(4 suppl):578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Renard J, et al. Transcapsular adenomectomy (Millin): a comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery. Eur Urol. 2006;49:120-126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barret E, Bracq A, Braud G, et al. The morbidity of laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy [abstract 1005]. Eur Urol Suppl. 2006;5(2):274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baumert H, Ballaro A, Dugardin F, Kaisary AV. Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: a comparative study. J Urol. 2006;175:1691-1694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peltier A, Hoffmann P, Hawaux E, Entezari K, Deneft F, van Velthoven R. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal Millin’s adenomectomy versus open retropubic adenomectomy: a prospective comparison. Eur Urol Suppl. 2007;6(2):163 [abstract 564].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:513-515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yuh B, Laungani R, Perlmutter A, et al. Robot-assisted Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: case series. Can J Urol. 2008;15(3):4101-4105.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rene J. Sotelo Noguera
    • 1
  • Juan C. Astigueta Pérez
    • 2
  • David Canes
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of Southern California Keck School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyInstituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Norte, TrujilloLa LibertadPeru
  3. 3.Department of UrologyLahey Clinic Hospital, BurlingtonMAUSA

Personalised recommendations