Advertisement

Unequal Vulnerability to Social Risks: Analysis of Hong Kong’s Social Strata (1993–2013)

  • Chi Kit Chan
  • David Wai Lun Ho
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy book series (PEPP)

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates the vulnerability to social risks of varying social strata in Hong Kong. We consolidate and compare the income, occupational statistics and employment conditions vis-à-vis key economic indicators from 1993 to 2013. The study period covers several global economic crises with which Hong Kong significantly afflicted since its handover to China—notably the Asian financial storm (1998), the epidemic crisis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) (2003), and the global financial tsunami (2008–09). Despite the recovery of Hong Kong’s economy since the aftermath of the financial tsunami, data show divergent employment conditions between the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ throughout the study period. The findings are indicative of unequal vulnerability to social risks of different social strata. This study thus echoes to the scholarly dialogue surrounding risk society theory, in particular the unequal distribution of social risk to those with varying socio-economic conditions.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Ms. Liu Yi Kwan, Joanne, for her assistance in data analysis and writing.

References

  1. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, Ulrich. 2009. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, Ulrich, and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, Peter M., and Duncan Otis D.. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Chamon, Marcos. D., and Eswar S. Prasad. 2010. “Why Are Saving Rates of Urban Households in China Rising?.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1): 93–130.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, Chi Kit. 2014. China as “Other”: Resistance to and Ambivalence Toward National Identity in Hong Kong. China Perspectives, 2014/1: 25–34.Google Scholar
  9. Chiu, Stephen W. K., and Lui, Tai Lok. 2004. “Testing the Global City-Social Polarisation Thesis: Hong Kong since the 1990s.” Urban Studies, 41(10): 1863–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duffield, Mark. 1996. “The Symphony of the Damned: Racial Discourse, Complex Political Emergencies and Humanitarian Aid.” Disasters, 20(3): 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott, Anthony. 2002. “Beck’s Sociology of Risk: A Critical Assessment.” Sociology, 36(2): 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity—Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, Anthony. 1999. Runaway World—How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  15. Hackers, Jacob S. 2008. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, David. 1990. “Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3): 418–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lusardi, Annamaria. 1998. “On the Importance of the Precautionary Saving Motive.” American Economic Association, 88: 449–453.Google Scholar
  18. Pevalin, David, and David Rose. 2002. The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: Unifying Official and Sociological Approaches to the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Social Class in the United Kingdom. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  19. Wang, Xin, and Yi Wen. 2010. Can Rising Housing Prices Explain China’s High Household Saving Rate? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series, No. 2010-048A.Google Scholar
  20. Winser, Ben, Piers Blaikie, Piers Terry Cannon, and Ian Davis 2003.At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters.London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CommunicationHang Seng Management CollegeHong KongChina
  2. 2.School of General Education and LanguagesTechnological and Higher Education Institute of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations