Skip to main content

Deconstruct and Preserve (DaP): A Method for the Preservation of Digital Evidence on Solid State Drives (SSD)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Global Security, Safety and Sustainability - The Security Challenges of the Connected World (ICGS3 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 630))

Abstract

Imaging SSDs is problematic due to TRIM commands and garbage collectors that make the SSD behave inconsistently over time. It is this inconsistency that can cause a difference between images taken of the SSD. These differences result in unmatched hash number generation and would normally be attributed to contamination or spoliation of digital evidence. DaP is a proposed method that ensures all images taken of the SSD are consistent and removes the volatility normally associated with these devices. DaP is not focused with the recoverability of deleted data, however DaP does stabilise the device to prevent unintentional contamination due to garbage collection. Experiments show that the DaP method works on a range of devices and consistently produces the hash-identical images. The conclusions are to consider DaP as a new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) when imaging SSDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO): Good practice guide for digital evidence (ver. 5), March 2012. https://www.7safe.com/research-and-insight/acpo-guidelines

  2. Beebe, N.L., Clark, J.G.: A hierarchical, objectives-based framework for the digital investigations process. Digit. Invest. 2(2), 147–167 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, G.B., Boddington, R.: Solid state drives: the beginning of the end for current practice in digital forensic recovery? J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law 5(3), 1–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carrier, B., Spafford, E.H.: An event-based digital forensic investigation framework. In: Digital Forensic Research Workshop, pp. 11–13 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. King, C., Vidas, T.: Empirical analysis of solid state disk data retention when used with contemporary operating systems. J. Digit. Invest. 8, S111–S117 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McKemmish, R.: What is Forensic Computing? Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 118 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. MSAB: XRY – Android basics: debugging and extractions (2015). XRY Certification Course

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nisbet, A., Lawrence, S., Ruff, M.: A forensic analysis and comparison of solid state drive data retention with trim enabled file systems. In: Australian Digital Forensics Conference, pp. 103–111 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Redgrave, J.M.: The Sedona Principles: Best Practices, Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production. Pike & Fischer-A BNA Company (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rogaway, P., Shrimpton, T.: Cryptographic hash-function basics: definitions, implications, and separations for preimage resistance, second-preimage resistance, and collision resistance. In: Roy, B., Meier, W. (eds.) FSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3017, pp. 371–388. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-25937-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWDGE): Model standard operation procedures for computer forensics (ver. 3). https://www.swgde.org/

  12. Shu, F., Obr, N.: Data set management commands proposal for ATA8-ACS2. Management 2, 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Statista.com: Global shipments of HDDs and SSDs in PCs from 2012 to 2017, June 2016. http://www.statista.com/statistics/285474/hdds-and-ssds-in-pcs-global-shipments-2012-2017/

  14. U.S. Department of Justice: Electronic Crime Scene Investigation: An On-the-Scene Reference for First Responders. National Institute of Justice, November 2009

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Mitchell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mitchell, I., Anandaraja, T., Hara, S., Hadzhinenov, G., Neilson, D. (2016). Deconstruct and Preserve (DaP): A Method for the Preservation of Digital Evidence on Solid State Drives (SSD). In: Jahankhani, H., et al. Global Security, Safety and Sustainability - The Security Challenges of the Connected World. ICGS3 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 630. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51064-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51064-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51063-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51064-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics