Recognition of Risk Factors and Patient Assessment
Esthetic outcomes are of central importance to most patients. To ensure that patients’ expectations are aligned with expected outcomes, a systematic risk assessment is required. Communication of the risk factors and expected outcomes is important to ensure the patient has realistic expectations. Risk reduction for implant therapy begins with collection of diagnostic information and sharing a comprehensive esthetic diagnosis with the patient. Esthetic risks for dental implants are often associated with the tissues that surround the implant, specifically the lack of interproximal tissue fill and the recession of buccal tissues following implant restoration. Diagnostic information regarding connective tissue attachment levels at adjacent teeth can clarify the risk for incomplete interproximal tissue fill, and steps to overcome buccal tissue recession include both augmentation procedures and proper dental implant placement. The establishment of ideal tooth contours for the implant crown is easily achieved when the proper volume of the supporting bone and soft tissue is provided. Integrating an ideal implant-supported restoration into a beautiful smile requires a comprehensive esthetic diagnosis, a broad approach to implant site development, and careful execution of the planned implant therapy.
KeywordsDental implant Esthetics Diagnosis Site development Risk factors
- Evans CD, Chen ST (2008) Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(1):73–80Google Scholar
- Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P (2007) In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 27(3):251–257Google Scholar
- Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. (2003) Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.18(2):189–99.Google Scholar
- Valentini P, Abensur D, Albertini JF, Rocchesani M. (2010) Immediate provisionalization of single extraction-site implants in the esthetic zone: a clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent;30(1):41–51.Google Scholar
- Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, Limpiphipatanakorn P, Yap AK, Tyndall D, Cooper LF (2012) Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27(6):1514–1519Google Scholar