Advertisement

The Concept of Person

  • Alan J. Kearns
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the concept of person and its significance for moral decision-making. The concept of person can be employed in discussions about difficult ethical issues, particularly those that arise at the beginning and end of life. Although philosophical reflections vary, self-consciousness, rationality and moral agency tend to be the main characteristics that define a person in contemporary discourse. Working with an explicit concept of person may be helpful when examining some of the ethical issues in nursing practice and healthcare. However, some of the resulting implications of using a concept of person may be counter-intuitive to nursing’s duty to care, especially for those who are most vulnerable.

Keywords

Human Being Person Potentiality Moral agency Rationality Self-consciousness Speciesism 

References

  1. Altman MC (2014) Kant and applied ethics: the uses and limits of Kant’s practical philosophy. Wiley Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2013) Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergson H (1991) The two sources of morality and religion. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgess JA (2010) Potential and foetal value. J Appl Philos 27(2):140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark MT (1992) An inquiry into personhood. Rev Metaphys 46(1):3–28Google Scholar
  6. Engelhardt HT Jr (1988) Medicine and the concept of person. In: Goodman MF (ed) What is a person? Humana Press, Clifton, pp 169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feinberg J (1984) Potentiality, development, and rights. In: Feinberg J (ed) The problem of abortion. Wadsworth, Belmont, pp 145–150Google Scholar
  8. Fletcher JF (1974) Four indicators of humanhood: the enquiry matures. Hastings Cent Rep 4(6):4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillon R (1985) To what do we have moral obligations and why? II. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 290(6483):1734–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffin J (2000) Welfare rights. J Ethics 4(1/2):27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris LJ (2002) Children’s rights. In: Hall KL, Clark DS, Ely JW, Grossman J, Hull NEH (eds) The oxford companion to American law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 95–97Google Scholar
  12. Huberts LWJC, Maesschalck J, Jurkiewicz CL (2008) Ethics and integrity of governance: perspectives across frontiers. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joyce RE (1988) Personhood and the conception event. In: Goodman MF (ed) What is a person? Humana Press, Clifton, pp p199–p211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kadlac A (2010) Humanizing personhood. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 13(4):421–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kant I (2002) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Wood AW (ed and trans). Yale University Press, New Haven Google Scholar
  16. Kearns AJ (2007) The concept of person in a world mediated by meaning and constituted by significance. Pneuma Springs, KentGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee P, George RP (2005) The wrong of abortion. In: Cohen AI, Wellman CH (eds) Contemporary debates in applied ethics. Blackwell, Malden, pp 13–26Google Scholar
  18. Locke J (1964) An essay concerning human understanding, Woozley AD (ed). Collins, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  19. Waite M (ed) (2007) Oxford dictionary & thesaurus. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Singer P (1993) Practical ethics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Singer P (1994) Rethinking life and death: the collapse of our traditional ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Teichman J (1985) The definition of person. Philosophy 60(232):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tooley M (1983) Abortion and infanticide. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations (UN) (1948) The universal declaration of human rights. Available via http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed 4 Aug 2016
  25. Zagzebski L (2001) The uniqueness of persons. J Relig Ethics 29(3):401–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ethics, School of Theology, Philosophy, and MusicDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations