Advertisement

Critical Autoethnography and Musical Improvisation: Reflections, Refractions and Twenty-First Century Dimensions

  • Leon R. de Bruin
Chapter
Part of the Creativity, Education and the Arts book series (CEA)

Abstract

This chapter considers how reflective practice demonstrates a cyclical potential; of self-reflexivity and reviewing personal, critical processes, and maintaining ongoing capacities for exploration and discovery. The chapter views the self-critical and self-affirming processes of an improvising musician, and the meaning-making derived from autoethnographic objects, collaborations and collectives, within communities of practice and the wider creative music politic. The chapter utilizes autoethnography to critically self-reflect the author’s learning journey as educator-practitioner-researcher and the ‘double-consciousness’ inherent as both insider and outsider to these paradigms. Issues of meaning in artefact and creative practices are explored and addressed, and the development and enhancement of self from performing artist to multi-dimensional performative researcher, and the self-critical awareness ushered by this journey.

References

  1. Adams, T. E., & Jones, S. H. (2011). Telling stories: Reflexivity, queer theory, and autoethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baerger, D. R., & McAdams, D. P. (1999). Life story coherence and its relation to psychological well-being. Narrative Inquiry, 9(1), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone, T. (2001). Touching eternity: The enduring outcomes of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (2012). Arts-based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bartleet, B. L. (2009). Behind the baton: Exploring autoethnographic writing in a musical context. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(6), 713–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, D. (2012). Life in the real world: How to make music graduates employable. Champaign, Illinois: Common Ground Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bochner, A. P. (1997). It’s about time: Narrative and the divided self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (2006). Communication as autoethnography. In G. Shepherd, J. S. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as: Perspectives on theory (pp. 110–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borgo, D. (2005). Sync or swarm. Improvising music in a complex age. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Bowman, W. D. (1998). Philosophical perspectives on music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Boyle, M., & Parry, K. (2007). Telling the whole story: The case for organizational autoethnography. Culture and Organization, 13(3), 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boylorn, R. M., & Orbe, M. P. (2016). Critical autoethnography: Intersecting cultural identities in everyday life. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bresler, L. (2006). Toward connectedness: Aesthetically based research. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 52–69.Google Scholar
  15. Burnard, P. (2012). Musical creativities in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler, J. (1999). Bodily inscriptions, performative subversions. In J. Price & M. Shildrick (Eds.), Feminist theory and the body: A reader (pp. 416–422). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2008). Arts-informed research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 55–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a system perspective for the study of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Custodero, L. A. (2005). Observable indicators of flow experience: A developmental perspective of musical engagement in young children from infancy to school age. Music Education Research, 7(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deau, K. (2001). Social identity. In J. Worrell (Ed.) Encyclopedia of women and gender, volumes one and two (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1–9). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. de Bruin, L. R. (2016a). Expert practitioner voices: A phenomenological inquiry into teaching, learning, and collaborating in musical improvisation. Ph.D. dissertation, Monash Univrsity, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  23. de Bruin, L. R. (2016b). The influence of situated and experiential music education in teacher-practitioner formation: An autoethnography. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 406–426. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2253&context=tqr Google Scholar
  24. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: GP Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  25. Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Intelligence without representation—Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation: The relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ellis, C. (2009). Autoethnography as method (review). Biography, 32(2), 360–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2002). Ethnographic representation as relationship. In C. Ellis & A. Bochner (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics (pp. 11–33). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  30. Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Theorising context in psychology: The case of creativity. Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 382–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glendenning, F. (2000). Teaching and learning in later life: Theoretical implications. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Arena.Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton, M., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and autoethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris, A. (2014). Ethnocinema and the impossibility of culture. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(4), 546–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holman Jones, S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 763–791). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Kant, I. (1928). Kant’s critique of teleological judgement (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kierkegaard, S. (1974). The ancient tragical motive as reflected in the modern. In B. F. Dukore (Ed.), Dramatic theory and criticism: Greeks to Grotowski (pp. 551–556). Boston, MA: Thomson & Heinle.Google Scholar
  37. Kihlstrom, J. F. (2013). The person-situation interaction. In D. Carlston (Ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 786–805). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kushner, S., Walker, B., & Tarr, J. (2001). Case studies and issues in community music. Bristol, UK: University of the West of England.Google Scholar
  39. Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art. London, UK: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis, G. E. (2002). Improvised music after 1950: Afrological and eurological perspectives. Black Music Research Journal, 22, 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Louth, P. J. (2012). An approach to improvisation in post-secondary jazz programmes based on negative dialectics. Journal of Music Education Research, 14(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magyari-Beck, I. (1999). Creatology. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 433–441). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nietzsche, F. (1973). Beyond good and evil (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  44. Pollock, D. (2006). Part I introduction: Performance trouble. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of performance studies (pp. 1–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Prouty, K. E. (2012). Knowing jazz: Community, pedagogy and canon in the information age. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  46. Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds. Learning to be creative. Oxford, UK: Capstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Rodriguez, C. (2009). Informal learning in music: Emerging roles of teachers and students. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 8(2), 35–45.Google Scholar
  48. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Salehi, S. (2008). Teaching contingencies: Deleuze, creativity discourses, and art. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario, Canada: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  50. Satre, J. P. (1957). Being and nothingness. London, England: Methuen. (First pub. 1943, L’Etre et Ie neant, Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
  51. Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 12–60). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott, J. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminist theorize the political (pp. 22–40). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Shepherd, J., & Wicke, P. (1997). Music and cultural theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2006). Narrative inquiry in psychology: Exploring the tensions within. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(3), 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Somerville, M. (2007). Postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sutton-Brown, C. (2010). Review of Carolyn Ellis’ book, revision: Autoethno-graphic reflections of life and work. The Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1306–1308.Google Scholar
  57. Tardif, T. Z., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 429–440). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Taylor, P. G. (1998). Taking the risk: A feminist art educator’s story of empowerment, teaching and learning. In E. Zimmerrnan & E. Sacca (Eds.), Women art educators IV: Herstones. Ourstories. Future stories (pp. 141–152). Boucherville, Quebec: Canadian Society for Education through Art.Google Scholar
  59. Tulving, E. (2005). Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human? In H. Terrance & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. 3–56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon R. de Bruin
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations