Advertisement

Got Lost: Embodied Vocal Performance at the Junction of Autoethnography and Practice-Based Research

  • Jessica Aszodi
Chapter
Part of the Creativity, Education and the Arts book series (CEA)

Abstract

This chapter takes the author’s singerly experience as a site for gleaning knowledge of the performing self through embodiment, and the relationship between composers, scores and the realisation of contemporary notated musical works. The specific focus of the chapter is the author’s practice-based research toward realising Helmut Lachenmann’s Got Lost (Got lost. 2008) for voice and piano. Got Lost is a piece that exploits the body of the singer and the attention of the listener with kaleidoscopic detail. In the process of learning, rehearsing and performing the piece, the author discovered some novel, and reinforced some well-known, methods for learning complex music in a way that enabled efficient modulation of attention and physical empowerment for task. This autoethnographic writing draws upon embodied practice, score analysis, existing literature and the composer’s own scholarly writings, seeking to make sense of the musical within the frame of the subjective.

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text (S. Heath, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Bartleet, B.-L. (2013). Artful and embodied methods, modes of inquiry, and forms of representation. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 443–464). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bernac, P. (1978). The Interpretation of French Song. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  4. Brodsky, S. (n.d.). All music. Retrieved 2015 from Helmut Lachenmann: temA: http://www.allmusic.com/composition/tema-for-flute-voice-cello-mc0002481423
  5. Cavarero, A. (2005). For more than one voice: Toward a philosophy of vocal expression (P. A. Kottman, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Connor, S. (2000). Dumbstruck: A cultural history of ventriloquism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connor, S. (2014). Beyond words: Sobs, hums, stutters and other vocalisations. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  8. Crispin, D., & Gilmore, B. (Eds.). (2014). Artistic experimentation in music. Ghent: Orpheus Institute Series.Google Scholar
  9. Cumming, N. (2000). The sonic self: Musical subjectivity and signification. Bloomington and Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, J. Q., Feldman, M., Kane, B., Rings, S., & Wilbourne, E. (2015). Colloquy: Why voice now? Journal of the American Musicological Society, 68(3), 653–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Assis, P., & Lachenmann, H. (2012). Inscriptions: An interview with Helmut Lachenmann. In P. De Assis (Ed.), Experimental affinities in music. Ghent: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dolar, M. (2006). A voice and nothing more. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dunsby, J. (2002). Theme. In A. Latham (Ed.), The Oxford companion to music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eidsheim, N. (2015). Sensing sound: Singing and listening as vibrational practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eidsheim, N., & Schlichter, S. (Eds.). (2014). Special issue: Voice matters. Postmodern Culture, 24(3).Google Scholar
  16. Gannon, S. (2013). Sketching subjectivities. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 228–243). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  17. Holman Jones, S., Ellis, C., & Adams, E. T. (Eds). (2013). The Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jamason, C. (2012). The performer and the composer. In C. Lawson & R. Stowell (Eds.), The Cambridge history of performance (pp. 105–134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, G., & Stokes, R. (2000). A French song companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kreiman, J., & Sidtis, D. (2013). Foundations of voice studies: An interdisciplinary approach to voice production and perception. Hokoken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Lachenmann, H. (1968). temA. Stuttgart, Germany: Breitkopf.Google Scholar
  22. Lachenmann, H. (1980). The beautiful in music today. Tempo, 135, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lachenmann, H. (1995). On Structuralism. Contemporary Music Review, 12 (1) 93–101.Google Scholar
  24. Lachenmann, H. (1999). Touched by Nono. Contemporary Music Review, 18 (1), 17–30.Google Scholar
  25. Lachenmann, H. (2008). Got lost. Stuttgart, Germany: Breitkopf.Google Scholar
  26. Lachenmann, H. (2014, August). Lecture on got lost. Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
  27. Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lowinsky, E. E. (1964). Musical genius—Evolution and origins of a concept. The Musical Quarterly, 50(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Macpherson, B., & Thomaidis, K. (Eds.). (2015). Voice studies: Critical approaches to process, performance and experience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Meizel, K. (2011). A powerful voice: Investigating vocality and identity. Voice and Speech Review, 7(1), 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orning, T. (2012). Pression—A performance study. Music Performance Research, 5, 12–31.Google Scholar
  32. Penny, J. (2009). The extended flutist: techniques, technologies and performer perceptions in music for flute and electronics. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Conservatorium Griffith University.Google Scholar
  33. Pessoa, F. (2002). The book of disquiet (R. Zenith, Trans.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  34. Pierson, M. (2015). The voice under erasure: Singing, melody and expression in late modernist music. Retrieved 2016 January from http://search.proquest.com.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/docview/1750090987?pq-origsite=summon
  35. Schick, S. (2006). The Percussionists Art: Same Bed Different Dreams. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  36. Spry, T. (2008). A “Performative-I” copresence: Embodying the ethnographic turn in performance and the performative turn in ethnography. Text and Performance Quarterly, 26(4), 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swithinbank, C. (2011). A structure of physicalities Helmut Lachenmann’s temA. Retrieved 2015 from Chris Swithinbank: http://www.chrisswithinbank.net/2011/03/a-structure-of-physicalities-helmut-lachenmann-tema/
  38. Taylor, A. (Ed.). (2016). ‘Collaboration’ in contemporary music. Contemporary Music Review, 35, 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica Aszodi
    • 1
  1. 1.NathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations