Advertisement

Musical Variation and Improvisation Based on Multi-resolution Representations

  • Johan LoeckxEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9617)

Abstract

Musical creativity is one of the show pieces of Artificial Intelligence and during the last decades, many paths have been explored to capture musical style and to generate new music. One of the approaches exploits the similarities between music and language. In this paper, Fluid Construction Grammar, a state-of-the-art computational grammar is used to parse/analyse an existing piece, in order to create a variation on the song and generate an improvisation in the same style, using the same bi-directional grammar. A novel multi-resolution time representation to model musical melodies is presented.

Keywords

Fluid Construction Grammar Improvisation Musical style Composition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the EU FP7 PRAISE project #318770.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, C.: A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum (1965)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conklin, D., Witten, I.H.: Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. J. New Music Res. 24(1), 51–73 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feld, S., Fox, A.: Music and language. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 23, 25–53 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerasymova, K., Steels, L., Van Trijp, R.: Aspectual morphology of russian verbs in fluid construction grammar. In: Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1370–1375. Cognitive Science Society gerasymova-09a. pdf Google Scholar (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbert, É., Conklin, D.: A probabilistic context-free grammar for melodic reduction (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gjerdingen, R.: Music in the Galant Style. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoffmann, T., Trousdale, G.: The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koelsch, S., Kasper, E., Sammler, D., Schulze, K., Gunter, T., Friederici, A.D.: Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing. Nat. Neurosci. 7(3), 302–307 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lartillot, O., Dubnov, S., Assayag, G., Bejerano, G.: Automatic modeling of musical style. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International Computer Music Conference, pp. 447–454 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lerdahl, F., Jackendoff, R.: An overview of hierarchical structure in music. Music Percept. 1, 229–252 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minsky, M.: Music, Mind, and Brain. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pachet, F.: The continuator: musical interaction with style. J. New Music Res. 32(3), 333–341 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pearce, M.T., Wiggins, G.A.: Expectation in melody: the influence of context and learning. Music Percept. 23(5), 377–405 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rohrmeier, M.: A generative grammar approach to diatonic harmonic structure. In: Proceedings of the 4th Sound and Music Computing Conference, pp. 97–100 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rohrmeier, M.A., Koelsch, S.: Predictive information processing in music cognition. a critical review. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83(2), 164–175 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Slevc, L.R., Patel, A.D.: Meaning in music and language: three key differences: comment on towards a neural basis of processing musical semantics by Stefan Koelsch. Phys. Life Rev. 8(2), 110–111 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steels, L.: Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar, vol. 11. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steels, L., De Beule, J.: Unify and merge in fluid construction grammar. In: Vogt, P., Sugita, Y., Tuci, E., Nehaniv, C.L. (eds.) EELC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4211, pp. 197–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Todd, P.M., Loy, D.G.: Music and Connectionism. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Trijp, R.: Feature matrices and agreement: a case study for German case. Des. Patterns Fluid Constr. Grammar 11, 205 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Artificial Intelligence LabVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselBelgium

Personalised recommendations