In Vitro Culture of Oocytes and Embryos with Micro-vibration: “Naturalization” of Routine IVF Procedure

  • Vladimir Isachenko
  • Karl Sterzik
  • Gohar Rahimi
  • Peter Mallmann
  • Evgenia Isachenko


In natural conditions, the oocyte and embryo are subjected to ever-changing dynamic processes. However, the routine-assisted reproductive technologies today involve the use of static in vitro culture systems. The objective was to determine whether there is any difference in the viability of embryos after in vitro culture under static and mechanical micro-vibration conditions. The viability of embryonic cells (9624 embryos) generated from 4436 couples after in vitro culture was evaluated. For groups ≤29 years, 30–34 years, 35–39 years, and ≥40 years, the following rates of high-quality embryos without fragmentation (2–4 blastomeres on Day 2; 6–8 blastomeres and compacting morula on Day 3; blastocyst, expanded and hatching blastocyst on Day 5) were detected (static vs. vibration, respectively): 65% vs. 71%, 44% vs. 69%, 67% vs. 76% (for statistic significant differences between respective rates in these three groups P < 0.05), and 67% vs. 66% (P > 0.1). The following baby-take-home rates were determined for groups ≤29 years, 30–34 years, 35–39 years, and ≥ 40 years (static vs. vibration, respectively): 30% vs. 31% (P > 0.1, increasing only on the level of tendency), 28% vs. 37%, 23% vs. 29%, and 9% vs. 15% (differences between respective rates in these three groups with P < 0.05). It was concluded that in vitro culture of embryos under micro-vibration (with a mimic of conditions in nature whereby oviductal fluid is mechanically agitated by the epithelial cilia) significantly increases the baby-take-home rate for patients 30 years of age and older.


Embryonic cell transplantation In vitro culture Micro-vibration Baby-take-home rate 


  1. 1.
    Infertility. Embryo transplantation. In vitro fertilisation. Available from:
  2. 2.
    Lyons RA, Djahanbakhch O, Mahmood T, Saridogan E, Sattar S, Sheaff MT, Naftalin AA, Chenoy R. Fallopian tube ciliary beat frequency in relation to the stage of menstrual cycle and anatomical site. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:584–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chauveau A, Arloing A, Fleming G. The comparative anatomy of the domesticated animals. New York: D. Appleton and Company; 1908. p. 1804.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schumann WO. [Über die Dämpfung der elektromagnetischen Eigenschwingnugen des Systems Erde – Luft – Ionosphäre]. Zeitschrift und Naturfirschung. 1952;7a:250–2.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    El Danasouri I, Sandi-Monroy N, Winkle T, Reeka N, Gagsteiger F. Micro-vibration culture and group culture increase fertilization and implantation rates in human embryos. Abstr. Ann. Meet. ESHRE; 2014; Munich.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG. The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veeck LL, Zaninovic N. An atlas of human blastocysts. New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fauci LJ, Dillon R. Biofluidmechanics of reproduction. Ann Rev Fluid Mech. 2006;38:371–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paltieli Y, Weichselbaum A, Hoffman N, Eibschitz I, Kam Z. Laser scattering instrument for real time in-vivo measurement of ciliary activity in human fallopian tubes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1638–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weström L, Mårdh PA, Mecklenburg CV, Håkansson CH. Studies on ciliated epithelia of the human genital tract. II. The mucociliary wave pattern of fallopian tube epithelium. Fertil Steril. 1997;28:955–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holwill MEJ. Hydrodynamics aspects of ciliary and flagellar movements. In: Sleigh MA, editor. Cilia and flagella. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 1974. p. 143–75.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller CE. The kinematics and dynamics of ciliary fluid systems. J Exp Biol. 1968;49:617–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mizobe Y, Yoshida M, Miyoshi K. Enhancement of cytoplasmic maturation of in vitro-matured pig oocytes by mechanical vibration. J Reprod Dev. 2010;56:287–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hur YS, Park JH, Ryu EK, Park SJ, Lee JH, Lee SH, Yoon J, Yoon SH, Hur CY, Lee WD, Lim JH. Effect of micro-vibration culture system on embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:835–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Isachenko
    • 1
  • Karl Sterzik
    • 2
  • Gohar Rahimi
    • 1
  • Peter Mallmann
    • 1
  • Evgenia Isachenko
    • 1
  1. 1.University Maternal Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cologne UniversityCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of Reproductive MedicineChristian-Lauritzen InstituteUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations