Abstract
Surgical team experience is an important determinant of operative outcome. However, even the most experienced team will not be familiar with all potential variability that could be encountered during a surgical procedure. Robotic surgery adds further complexity through advanced technology, additional equipment, intricate process steps, etc. One method that is crucial to understanding a robotic procedure is surgical observation, which can be used to identify the process flow and involved objects. Another method is task excursion analysis, a proactive approach to understanding system variability and key factors that may affect system performance and patient safety. Finally, a method must be used to efficiently present the gathered information to surgical teams. As rapidly evolving technology is introduced into health care systems, the adoption of these types of methods is necessary to ensure patient safety. This paper describes the proposed methodology for analyzing robotic surgery variability and provides some example data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Yu, H.Y., et al.: Hospital volume, utilization, costs and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 187(5), 1632–1637 (2012)
Chang, S.L., et al.: The impact of robotic surgery on the surgical management of prostate cancer in the USA. BJU Int. 115(6), 929–936 (2015)
Martino, M.A., et al.: A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic versus non-robotic approaches. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 21(3), 389–393 (2014)
Subramaniam, A., et al.: A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 122(3), 604–607 (2011)
Fuller, H.J., Bagian, T.M..: Task excursion analysis: matching the tool to the user, environment, and task. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care. SAGE Publications, UK (2014)
Burt, B.M., et al.: Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 150(5), 1061–1067, 1068 e1–e3 (2015)
Grillone, G.A., Jalisi, S.: Robotic surgery of the head and neck: a comprehensive guide. Springer, New York. 160 pages (2015)
Bagian, T.M., Jacobs, K., Pandya, A.: Proactively investigating “Limits of use” with medical device manufacturers—an example case: robotic surgery. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 269–271 (2015)
US Department of Health and Human Services, F.D.A.: Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices. Center for Device and Radiological Health, Office of Device Evaluation (2016)
Reason, J.: Safety in the operating theatre—part 2: human error and organisational failure. Qual Saf Health Care 14(1), 56–60 (2005)
Helmreich, R.L.: On error management: lessons from aviation. BMJ 320(7237), 781–785 (2000)
DeRosier, J., et al.: Using health care failure mode and effect analysis: the VA National center for patient safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Joint Commission J. Qual. Patient Safety 28(5), 248–267 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Composto, A.M., Reisner, L.A., Pandya, A.K., Edelman, D.A., Jacobs, K.L., Bagian, T.M. (2017). Methods to Characterize Operating Room Variables in Robotic Surgery to Enhance Patient Safety. In: Duffy, V., Lightner, N. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 482. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41652-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41652-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41651-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41652-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)