Skip to main content

Methods to Characterize Operating Room Variables in Robotic Surgery to Enhance Patient Safety

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare

Abstract

Surgical team experience is an important determinant of operative outcome. However, even the most experienced team will not be familiar with all potential variability that could be encountered during a surgical procedure. Robotic surgery adds further complexity through advanced technology, additional equipment, intricate process steps, etc. One method that is crucial to understanding a robotic procedure is surgical observation, which can be used to identify the process flow and involved objects. Another method is task excursion analysis, a proactive approach to understanding system variability and key factors that may affect system performance and patient safety. Finally, a method must be used to efficiently present the gathered information to surgical teams. As rapidly evolving technology is introduced into health care systems, the adoption of these types of methods is necessary to ensure patient safety. This paper describes the proposed methodology for analyzing robotic surgery variability and provides some example data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yu, H.Y., et al.: Hospital volume, utilization, costs and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 187(5), 1632–1637 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, S.L., et al.: The impact of robotic surgery on the surgical management of prostate cancer in the USA. BJU Int. 115(6), 929–936 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martino, M.A., et al.: A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic versus non-robotic approaches. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 21(3), 389–393 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Subramaniam, A., et al.: A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 122(3), 604–607 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuller, H.J., Bagian, T.M..: Task excursion analysis: matching the tool to the user, environment, and task. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care. SAGE Publications, UK (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burt, B.M., et al.: Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 150(5), 1061–1067, 1068 e1–e3 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grillone, G.A., Jalisi, S.: Robotic surgery of the head and neck: a comprehensive guide. Springer, New York. 160 pages (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bagian, T.M., Jacobs, K., Pandya, A.: Proactively investigating “Limits of use” with medical device manufacturers—an example case: robotic surgery. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 269–271 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. US Department of Health and Human Services, F.D.A.: Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices. Center for Device and Radiological Health, Office of Device Evaluation (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reason, J.: Safety in the operating theatre—part 2: human error and organisational failure. Qual Saf Health Care 14(1), 56–60 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Helmreich, R.L.: On error management: lessons from aviation. BMJ 320(7237), 781–785 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeRosier, J., et al.: Using health care failure mode and effect analysis: the VA National center for patient safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Joint Commission J. Qual. Patient Safety 28(5), 248–267 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tandi M. Bagian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Composto, A.M., Reisner, L.A., Pandya, A.K., Edelman, D.A., Jacobs, K.L., Bagian, T.M. (2017). Methods to Characterize Operating Room Variables in Robotic Surgery to Enhance Patient Safety. In: Duffy, V., Lightner, N. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 482. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41652-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41652-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41651-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41652-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics