Can We Call It a Revolution? Women, the Labour Market, and European Policy

Chapter

Abstract

In the USA the change in women's role in the economy over the last quarter-century has been likened to 'a quiet revolution'. Can we also talk of a quiet 'revolution' in Europe? The present article addresses this question by reviewing key developments in women's labour market position at EU level over the last 20 years. Full integration of women in the labour market was a focal point of European Employment Strategy, based on the understanding that it is an essential ingredient of gender equality; but it recently lost priority in favour of human rights and anti-discrimination goals. Policy responses to the financial crisis accelerated this change in priorities together with the perception that men are the real losers of the crisis. However, a stock-taking of women's integration into the labour market at EU level shows that two large obstacles stand in the way of full integration: regional imbalances and the secondary earner question. Female employment recently outperformed male employment, but fiscal consolidation policies currently hinder advancement in countries like the so-called GIPSI group, where progress is needed most. Meanwhile differences with respect to men in pension income or total earnings remain high at around forty percent. Reconciliation policy at EU level – leave design and care service provisioning in particular – had not consistently helped rebalance the gender division of labour within households. It needs recasting for a truly revolutionary change in women’s role in the economy to materialize.

Keywords

Women Employment Secondary earners Gender gaps European policy Reconciliation Regional divides 

References

  1. Bertrand, Marianne. 2015. Unlocking the Psychological Keys to Economic Independence. In Visions for Gender Equality, ed. Francesca Bettio, and Silvia Sansonetti. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  2. Bettio, Francesca, Marcella Corsi, Carlo D’Ippoliti, Antigone Lyberaki, Manuela Samek Lodovici, and Alina Verashchagina. 2013. The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Situation of Women and Men and on Gender Equality Policies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  3. Bettio, Francesca, and Janneke Plantenga. 2004. Comparing Care Regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics 10(1): 85–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, Francine D., and Andrea H. Beller. 1998. Trends in Earnings Differentials by Gender, 1971–1981. ILR Review 41(4): 513–529.Google Scholar
  5. Boll, Christina, Julian Leppin, Anja Rossen, and Andre Wolf. 2016. Magnitude and Impact Factors of the Gender Pay Gap in EU Countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  6. Bruning, Gwennaële, and Janneke Plantenga. 1999. Parental Leave and Equal Opportunities: Experiences in Eight European Countries. Journal of European Social Policy 9(3): 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiuri, Maria Concetta. 1999. Intra-household Allocation of Time and Resources: Empirical Evidence on a Sample of Italian Household with Young Children. CSEF Working Papers No. 15.Google Scholar
  8. Dearing, Helene. 2015. Does Parental Leave Influence the Gender Division of Labour? Recent Empirical Findings from Europe. Institute for Social Policy Working Paper No. 1: 1–15.Google Scholar
  9. Del Boca, Daniela. 2002. Do Child Care Costs Affect Labor Market Decision: Evidence from Italy. IZA.Google Scholar
  10. European Parliament. 2015. Maternity, Paternity and Parental Leave: Data Related to Duration and Compensation Rates in the European Union, European Parliament Study. Brussels: European Union.Google Scholar
  11. Fabrizi, Elena, and Michele Raitano. 2012. Rigido, flessibile o liquido? L’immagine del mercato del lavoro italiano dal dataset AD-SILC. Economia & Lavoro.Google Scholar
  12. Fagan, Colette, and Helen Norman. 2015. Arrangements for Adequate Family-related Leave: Parental Leave. In Work-Life Balance Revisited, by Antigone Lyberaki. Brussels: D.G. Justice.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, Richard B., Ronald Schettkat, Ernst Duflo, and Tullio Jappelli. 2005. Marketization of Production and the EU-US Gap in Work. Economic Policy 20(41): 5+7–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldin, Claudia. 2006. The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family. NBER Working Paper No. 11953.Google Scholar
  15. Gornick, Janet C., Marcia K. Meyers, and Katherin E. Ross. 1997. Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation Across Fourteen Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy 7(1): 45–70. Google Scholar
  16. Gustafsson, Siv, and Frank Stafford. 1992. Child Care Subsidies and Labor Supply in Sweden. Journal of Human Resources 27(1): 204–223. Google Scholar
  17. Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2015. Equality, Freedom and the Sexual Division of Labour. In Visions for Gender Equality, ed. Francesca Bettio, and Silvia Sansonetti. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  18. Jacquot, Sophie. 2015. Transformations in EU Gender Equality: From Emergence to Dismantling. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaumotte, Florence. 2003. Labour Force Participation of Women, Empirical Evidence on the Role of Policy and Other Determinants in OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies 9 2(37): 51–108.Google Scholar
  20. Kantola, Johanna. 2015. Gender Equality Governance and Tools: The Need for Renewed Focus and a Clear Vision. In Visions for Gender Equality, ed. Francesca Bettio, and Silvia Sansonetti. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, Olivia, and Karen Skelton (ed). 2014. The Shriver Report. A Woman’s Nation Pushes Back from the Brink. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Nollenberger, Natalia, and Núria Rodriguez Planas. 2011. Child Care, Maternal Employment and Persistence: A Natural Experiment from Spain. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5888.Google Scholar
  23. OECD. 2007. Babies and Bosses. Reconciling Work and Family Life. A Synthesis of Findings for OECD Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  24. Ondrich, Jan, Katharina C. Spiess, Quing Yang, and Gert G. Wagner. 2003. The Liberalization of Maternity Leave Policy and the Return to Work after Childbirth in Germany. Review of Economics of the Household 1(1–2): 77–110.Google Scholar
  25. Perrons, Diane. 2015. Gender Equality in Times of Inequality, Crisis and Austerity: Towards Gender-Sensitive Macroeconomic Policies. In Visions for Gender Equality, ed. Francesca Bettio, and Silvia Sansonetti. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  26. Rastrigina, Olga, and Alina Verashchagina. 2015. Secondary Earners and Fiscal Policies in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  27. Ruhm, Christopher J. 1998. The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(1): 285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, Mark, and Paola Villa. 2010. The Ever-Declining Role of Gender Equality in the European Employment Strategy. Industrial Relations Journal 41(6): 526–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thévenon, Olivier. 2013. Drivers of Female Labour Force Participation in the OECD. In OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 145, ed. OECD. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Tinios, Platon, Francesca Bettio, and Gianno Betti. 2015. Men, Women and Pensions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  31. Wrohlich, Katharina. 2011. Labor Supply and Child Care Choices in a Rationed Child Care Market. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1169.Google Scholar
  32. Zabalza, Antoni, and Zafiris Tzannatos. 1985. The Effect of Britain’s Anti-Discriminatory Legislation on Relative Pay and Employment. The Economic Journal 95(379): 679–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Economia Politica e StatisticaUniversità di SienaSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations