Advertisement

Flood Impacts on Road Transportation Using Microscopic Traffic Modelling Techniques

  • Katya Pyatkova
  • Albert S. Chen
  • Slobodan Djordjević
  • David Butler
  • Zoran Vojinović
  • Yared A. Abebe
  • Michael Hammond
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel methodology for modelling the impacts of floods on traffic. Often, flooding is a complex combination of various causes (coastal, fluvial and pluvial). Further, transportation systems are very sensitive to external disturbances. The interactions between these two complex and dynamic systems have not been studied in detail so far. To address this issue, this paper proposes a methodology for a dynamic integration of a flood model (MIKE FLOOD) and a microscopic traffic simulation model (SUMO). The flood modelling results indicate which roads are inundated for a period of time. The traffic on these links will be halted or delayed according to the flood characteristics—extent, propagation and depth. As a consequence, some of the trips need to be cancelled; some need to be rerouted to unfavourable routes; and some are indirectly affected. A comparison between the baseline and a flood scenario yields the impacts of that flood on traffic, estimated in terms of lost business hours, additional fuel consumption and additional CO2 emissions. The proposed methodology will be further developed as a workable tool to evaluate the flooding impact on transportation network at city scale automatically.

Keywords

Microscopic traffic modelling Road networks Traffic disruption Model integration Flood modelling Flood impacts 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research on the PEARL (Preparing for Extreme And Rare events in coastaL regions) project is funded by the European Commission through Framework Programme 7, Grant Number 603663.

References

  1. 1.
    Al Hassan Y, Barker DJ (1999) The impact of unseasonable or extreme weather on traffic activity within Lothian region, Scotland. J Transp Geogr 7:209–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(98)00047-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behrisch M, Bieker L, Erdmann J, Krajzewicz D (2011) SUMO—Simulation of Urban MObility—an overview. Presented at the SIMUL 2011, The third international conference on advances in system simulation, pp 55–60Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang H, Lafrenz M, Jung I-W, Figliozzi M, Platman D, Pederson C (2010) Potential impacts of climate change on flood-induced travel disruptions: a case study of Portland, Oregon, USA. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100:938–952.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.497110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang T-J, Wang C-H, Chen AS (2015) A novel approach to model dynamic flow interactions between storm sewer system and overland surface for different land covers in urban areas. J Hydrol 524:662–679.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung E, Ohtani O, Warita H, Kuwahara M, Morita H (2005) Effect of rain on travel demand and traffic accidents. In: Presented at the 2005 IEEE intelligent transportation systems, 2005. Proceedings, pp 1080–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2005.1520201
  6. 6.
    Cools M, Moons E, Wets G (2010) Assessing the impact of weather on traffic intensity. Weather Clim Soc 2:60–68.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WCAS1014.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DHI (2007) MIKE FLOOD modelling of urban flooding, A Step-by-step training guideGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Djordjević S, Chen A, Leandro J, Savić D, Boonya-aroonnet S, Maksimović Č, Prodanović D, Blanksby J, Saul A (2007) Integrated sub-surface/surface 1D/1D and 1D/2D modelling of urban flooding. Proc Aquaterra World Forum Delta Coast, DevGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doll C, Trinks C, Sedlacek N, Pelikan V, Comes T, Schultmann F (2013) Adapting rail and road networks to weather extremes: case studies for southern Germany and Austria. Nat Hazards 72:63–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0969-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Douglas NJ, Franzmann LJ, Frost TW (2003) The estimation of demand parameters for primary public transport service in Brisbane attributes. In: Australasian transport research forum (ATRF), 26th, 2003, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Helbing D, Hennecke A, Shvetsov V, Treiber M (2002) Micro- and macro-simulation of freeway traffic. Math Comput Model 35:517–547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(02)80019-XMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keay K, Simmonds I (2005) The association of rainfall and other weather variables with road traffic volume in Melbourne, Australia. Accid Anal Prev 37:109–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keller RJ, Mitsch BF (1992) Stability of cars and children in flooded streets. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=696127213419517;res=IELENG. Accessed 1 May 2015)
  14. 14.
    Kerner BS, Klenov SL (2003) Microscopic theory of spatial-temporal congested traffic patterns at highway bottlenecks. Phys Rev E 68:036130.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.036130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koetse MJ, Rietveld P (2009) The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings. Transp Res Part Transp Environ 14:205–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2008.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maze T, Agarwai M, Burchett G (2006) Whether weather matters to traffic demand, traffic safety, and traffic operations and flow. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1948:170–176.  https://doi.org/10.3141/1948-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merz B, Kreibich H, Schwarze R, Thieken A (2010) Review article “Assessment of economic flood damage”. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1697–1724.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michaelides S (2014) Vulnerability of transportation to extreme weather and climate change. Nat Hazards 72:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0975-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nokkala M, Leviäkangas P, Oiva K (2012) The costs of extreme weather for the European transpor tsystems (No. EWENT project D4)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Penning-Rowsell E (2010) The benefits of flood and coastal risk management: a manual of assessment techniques/Edmund Penning-Rowsell… [et al.].: Middlesex University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Penning-Rowsell E, Chatterton J, Rowsell EP (1980) Assessing benefits the of flood alleviation and land drainage schemes. ICE Proc 69:295–315.  https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1980.2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shand TD, Smith GP, Cox RJ, Blacka M (2011) Development of appropriate criteria for the safety and stability of persons and vehicles in floods. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=317612923491163;res=IELENG. Accessed 1 June 2015
  23. 23.
    Smith BL, Byrne KG, Copperman RB, Hennessy SM, Goodall NJ (2004) An investigation into the impact of rainfall on freeway traffic flow. In: 83rd Annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suarez P, Anderson W, Mahal V, Lakshmanan TR (2005) Impacts of flooding and climate change on urban transportation: a systemwide performance assessment of the Boston Metro Area. Transp Res Part Transp Environ 10:231–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Teo FY, Xia J, Falconer RA, Lin B (2012) Experimental studies on the interaction between vehicles and floodplain flows. Int J River Basin Manag 10:149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2012.674040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tervonen J, Ristikartano J, Penttinen M-M (2010) Tieliikenteen ajokustannusten yksikköarvojen määrittäminen. Liikenneviraston Tutkimuksia Ja Selvityksiä 33:2010Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    UNDP (2012) Innovation and technology in risk mitigation and development planning in SIDS: Towards flood risk reduction in Sint Maarten. United Nations Development Programme, Barbados and the OECSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vickerman R (2000) Evaluation methodologies for transport projects in the United Kingdom. Transp Policy 7:7–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-070x(00)00009-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katya Pyatkova
    • 1
  • Albert S. Chen
    • 1
  • Slobodan Djordjević
    • 1
  • David Butler
    • 1
  • Zoran Vojinović
    • 2
  • Yared A. Abebe
    • 2
  • Michael Hammond
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Water SystemsUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  2. 2.UNESCO-IHEInstitute for Water EducationDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations