Microvascular Anastomoses: Suture and Non-suture Methods

  • R. A. J. WainEmail author
  • D. Hammond
  • M. McPhillips
  • J. P. M. Whitty
  • W. AhmedEmail author


A plethora of methods have been proposed for coapting microvessels, with the mainstay being hand-suturing under an operating microscope. A broad range of hand-sutured techniques have been described and these are still evolving today. Alongside this, non-suture methods of microvascular anastomosis have gained popularity over recent years with numerous intra- and extravascular approaches being proposed. This section addresses the development of microsurgical suture technique for microvascular anastomosis, and continues to present the array of non-suture methods currently proposed as alternatives to standard suturing.


Microvascular Microarterial Anastomosis Microsurgery Suture Coupling Ring-pin Clips Adhesives Gels Stents Laser Magnets 


  1. 1.
    Jassinowsky, A. (1889). Die Arteriennhat: Eine experimentelle Studie. Inaugural Dissertation Dorpat, 1–103.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carrel, A. (1902). La technique operatoire des anastomoses vasculaires et la transplantation des visceres. Lyon Medical, 98, 859–864.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rickard, R. F., & Hudson, D. A. (2014). A history of vascular and microvascular surgery. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 73(4), 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zeebregts, C. J., Heijmen, R. H., van den Dungen, J. J., & van Schilfgaarde, R. (2003). Non-suture methods of vascular anastomosis. British Journal of Surgery, 90(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacobson, J. H, I. I., & Suarez, E. L. (1960). Microsurgery in anastomosis of small vessels. Surgical Forum, 11, 243–245.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malt, R. A., & McKhann, C. F. (1964). Replantation of severed arms. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 189(10), 716–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Komatsu, S., & Tamai, S. (1968). Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 42(4), 374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McLean, D. H., & Buncke, H. J, Jr. (1972). Autotransplant of omentum to a large scalp defect, with microsurgical revascularization. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 49(3), 268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniel, R. K., & Taylor, G. I. (1973). Distant transfer of an island flap by microvascular anastomoses. A clinical technique. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 52(2), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Brien, B. M., MacLeod, A. M., Hayhurst, J. W., & Morrison, W. A. (1973). Successful transfer of a large island flap from the groin to the foot by microvascular anastomoses. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 52(3), 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petruzzo, P., Testelin, S., Kanitakis, J., Badet, L., Lengelé, B., Girbon, J.-P., et al. (2012). First human face transplantation: 5 years outcomes. Transplantation, 93(2), 236–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alghoul, M. S., Gordon, C. R., Yetman, R., Buncke, G. M., Siemionow, M., Afifi, A. M., et al. (2011). From simple interrupted to complex spiral: A systematic review of various suture techniques for microvascular anastomoses. Microsurgery, 31(1), 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Acland, R. D. (1988). Practice manual for microvascular surgery (2nd revised ed.). Mosby.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shurey, S., & Green, C. (2011). Basic microsurgical techniques: A laboratory manual. Middlesex, UK: Surgical Research Department, NPIMR, Northwick Park Hospital.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jandali, S., Wu, L. C., Vega, S. J., Kovach, S. J., & Serletti, J. M. (2010). 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 125(3), 792–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cobbett, J. (1967). Small vessel anastomosis. A comparison of suture techniques. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 20(1), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jenkins, J. D. (1967). Repair of small vessels. The British Journal of Surgery, 54(6), 558–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siemionow, M. (2015). Plastic and reconstructive surgery: Experimental models and research designs. Springer.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colen, L. B., Gonzales, F. P., & Buncke, H. J. (1979). The relationship between the number of sutures and the strength of microvascular anastomoses. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 64(3), 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wain, R. A. J., Whitty, J. P. M., Hammond, D., McPhillips, M., & Ahmed, W. (2015). Microarterial anastomoses: A parameterised computational study examining the effect of suture position on intravascular blood flow. Microvascular Research, 105, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Little, J. R., & Salerno, T. A. (1978). Continuous suturing for microvascular anastomosis. Technical note. Journal of Neurosurgery, 48(6), 1042–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Disa, J. J., Cordeiro, P. G., & Hidalgo, D. A. (1999). Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: An 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 104(1), 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bui, D. T., Cordeiro, P. G., Hu, Q.-Y., Disa, J. J., Pusic, A., & Mehrara, B. J. (2007). Free flap reexploration: Indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 119(7), 2092–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kroll, S. S., Schusterman, M. A., Reece, G. P., Miller, M. J., Evans, G. R., Robb, G. L., et al. (1996). Choice of flap and incidence of free flap success. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 98(3), 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ardehali, B., Morritt, A. N., & Jain, A. (2014). Systematic review: Anastomotic microvascular device. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS, 67(6), 752–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reddy, C., Pennington, D., & Stern, H. (2012). Microvascular anastomosis using the vascular closure device in free flap reconstructive surgery: A 13-year experience. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS, 65(2), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zeebregts, C., Acosta, R., Bölander, L., van Schilfgaarde, R., & Jakobsson, O. (2002). Clinical experience with non-penetrating vascular clips in free-flap reconstructions. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 55(2), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pratt, G. F., Rozen, W. M., Westwood, A., Hancock, A., Chubb, D., Ashton, M. W., et al. (2012). Technology-assisted and sutureless microvascular anastomoses: Evidence for current techniques. Microsurgery, 32(1), 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bikfalvi, A., & Dubecz, S. (1953). Observations in animal experiments with mechanised vessel suture. Journal International De Chirurgie, 13(5), 481–496.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kirsch, W. M., Zhu, Y. H., Hardesty, R. A., & Chapolini, R. (1992). A new method for microvascular anastomosis: Report of experimental and clinical research. The American Surgeon, 58(12), 722–727.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zeebregts, C. J., Kirsch, W. M., van den Dungen, J. J., Zhu, Y. H., & van Schilfgaarde, R. (2004). Five years’ world experience with nonpenetrating clips for vascular anastomoses. American Journal of Surgery, 187(6), 751–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cope, C., Lee, K., Stern, H., & Pennington, D. (2000). Use of the vascular closure staple clip applier for microvascular anastomosis in free-flap surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 106(1), 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rozen, W. M., Whitaker, I. S., & Acosta, R. (2010). Venous coupler for free-flap anastomosis: Outcomes of 1,000 cases. Anticancer Research, 30(4), 1293–1294.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taylor, J., Katz, R., & Singh, N. (2006). Use of the U-clip for microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery, 26(8), 550–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baynosa, R. C., Stutman, R., Mahabir, R. C., Zamboni, W. A., & Khiabani, K. T. (2008). Use of a novel penetrating, sutureless anastomotic device in arterial microvascular anastomoses. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 24(1), 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maher, J. L., Roehl, K. R., & Mahabir, R. C. (2012). A prospective evaluation of U-clips for arterial microvascular anastomoses. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 28(8), 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee, M. G. M., & Jones, D. (2005). Applications of fibrin sealant in surgery. Surgical Innovation, 12(3), 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cho, A. B., Wei, T. H., Torres, L. R., Júnior, R. M., Rugiero, G. M., & Aita, M. A. (2009). Fibrin glue application in microvascular anastomosis: Comparative study of two free flaps series. Microsurgery, 29(1), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Andree, C., Munder, B. I. J., Behrendt, P., Hellmann, S., Audretsch, W., Voigt, M., et al. (2008). Improved safety of autologous breast reconstruction surgery by stabilisation of microsurgical vessel anastomoses using fibrin sealant in 349 free DIEP or fascia-muscle-sparing (fms)-TRAM flaps: A two-centre study. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 17(5), 492–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marek, C. A., Amiss, L. R., Morgan, R. F., Spotnitz, W. D., & Drake, D. B. (1998). Acute thrombogenic effects of fibrin sealant on microvascular anastomoses in a rat model. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 41(4), 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gottlob, R., & Blümel, G. (1968). Anastomoses of small arteries and veins by means of bushings and adhesive. The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 9(4), 337–341.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Green, A. R., Milling, M. A., & Green, A. R. (1986). Butylcyanoacrylate adhesives in microvascular surgery: An experimental pilot study. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 2(2), 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chang, E. I., Galvez, M. G., Glotzbach, J. P., Hamou, C. D., El-ftesi, S., Rappleye, C. T., et al. (2011). Vascular anastomosis using controlled phase transitions in poloxamer gels. Nature Medicine, 17(9), 1147–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Qassemyar, Q., & Michel, G. (2015). A new method of sutureless microvascular anastomoses using a thermosensitive poloxamer and cyanoacrylate: An experimental study. Microsurgery, 35(4), 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sigel, B., & Acevedo, F. J. (1962). Vein anastomosis by electrocoaptive union. Surgical Forum, 13, 233–235.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Puca, A., Esposito, G., Albanese, A., Maira, G., Rossi, F., & Pini, R. (2009). Minimally occlusive laser vascular anastomosis (MOLVA): Experimental study. Acta Neurochirurgica, 151(4), 363–368; discussion 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wolf-de Jonge, I. C. D. Y. M., Beek, J. F., & Balm, R. (2004). 25 years of laser assisted vascular anastomosis (LAVA): What have we learned? European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: The Official Journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, 27(5):466–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lorincz, B. B., Kálmán, E., & Gerlinger, I. (2007). KTP-532 laser-assisted microvascular anastomosis (experimental animal study). European archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 264(7), 823–828.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leclère, F. M., Duquennoy-Martinot, V., Schoofs, M., Buys, B., & Mordon, S. (2011). Thirty years of laser-assisted microvascular anastomosis (LAMA): What are the clinical perspectives? Neuro-Chirurgie, 57(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Leclère, F. M. P., Schoofs, M., Buys, B., & Mordon, S. R. (2010). Outcomes after 1.9-μm diode laser-assisted anastomosis in reconstructive microsurgery: Results in 27 patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 125(4), 1167–1175.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    O’Neill, A. C., Winograd, J. M., Zeballos, J. L., Johnson, T. S., Randolph, M. A., Bujold, K. E., et al. (2007). Microvascular anastomosis using a photochemical tissue bonding technique. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 39(9), 716–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yamagata, S., Handa, H., Taki, W., Yonekawa, Y., Ikada, Y., & Iwata, H. (1979). Experimental nonsuture microvascular anastomosis using a soluble PVA tube and plastic adhesive. Journal of Microsurgery, 1(3), 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Moskovitz, M. J., Bass, L., Zhang, L., & Siebert, J. W. (1994). Microvascular anastomoses utilizing new intravascular stents. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 32(6), 612–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mikaelsson, C., & Arnbjörnsson, E. (1996). Nonsuture end-to-end microvascular anastomosis using intravascular stents. Annales Chirurgiae Et Gynaecologiae, 85(1), 36–39.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Prabhu, I. S., & Homer-Vanniasinkam, S. (2013). A proof-of-principle study on animals for a new method of anastomosing vessels using intraluminal stents. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery: Official Publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 41(4), 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bauer, F., Fichter, A. M., Loeffelbein, D. J., Wolff, K.-D., Schütz, K., & Mücke, T. (2015). Microvascular anastomosis using modified micro-stents: A pilot in vivo study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(2), 204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Obora, Y., Tamaki, N., & Matsumoto, S. (1978). Nonsuture microvascular anastomosis using magnet rings: Preliminary report. Surgical Neurology, 9(2), 117–120.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Obora, Y., Tamaki, N., & Matsumoto, S. (1980). Nonsuture microvascular anastomosis using magnet rings. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 20(5), 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Heitmann, C., Khan, F. N., Erdmann, D., Olbrich, K. C., Sharkawy, A. A., & Klitzman, B. (2007). Vein graft anastomoses with magnets. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS, 60(12), 1296–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Liu, S.-Q., Lei, P., Cao, Z.-P., Lv, Y., Li, J.-H., & Cui, X.-H. (2012). Nonsuture anastomosis of arteries and veins using the magnetic pinned-ring device: A histologic and scanning electron microscopic study. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 26(7), 985–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Giessler, G. A., Fischborn, G. T., & Schmidt, A. B. (2012). Clampless anastomosis with an intraluminal thermosensitive gel: First application in reconstructive microsurgery and literature review. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 65(1), 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Manchio, J. V., Litchfield, C. R., Zeheb, R., & Bryan, D. J. (2009). Evaluation of a novel reverse thermosensitive polymer for use in microvascular surgery. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 25(1), 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ueda, K., Mukai, T., Ichinose, S., Koyama, Y., & Takakuda, K. (2010). Bioabsorbable device for small-caliber vessel anastomosis. Microsurgery, 30(6), 494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nakayama, K., et al. (1962). A simple new method for small vessel anastomoses (free autograft of the sigmoid included). Surgery, 52, 918–931.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Payr, E. (1900). Beiträge zur Technik der Blutgefäss und Nervennaht nebst Mittheilungen über die Verwendung eines resorbirbaren Metalles in der Chirurgie. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir, 62, 67–93.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ostrup, L. T. (1976). Anastomosis of small veins with suture or Nakayama’s apparatus. A comparative study. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 10(1), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ostrup, L. T., & Berggren, A. (1986). The UNILINK instrument system for fast and safe microvascular anastomosis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 17(6), 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ahn, C. Y., Shaw, W. W., Berns, S., & Markowitz, B. L. (1994). Clinical experience with the 3m microvascular coupling anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 93(7), 1481–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cope, C. (2001). Technique and clinical experience of the Unilink/3m(R) microvascular anastomotic coupling device in free flap surgery. Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1, 1.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Yap, L. H., Constantinides, J., & Butler, C. E. (2006). Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 57(6), 666–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ross, D. A., Chow, J. Y., Shin, J., Restifo, R., Joe, J. K., Sasaki, C. T., et al. (2005). Arterial coupling for microvascular free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 131(10), 891–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chernichenko, N., Ross, D. A., Shin, J., Chow, J. Y., Sasaki, C. T., & Ariyan, S. (2008). Arterial coupling for microvascular free tissue transfer. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 138(5), 614–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jason Spector, J. A., Draper, L. B., Levine, J. P., & Ahn, C. Y. (2006). Routine use of microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomosis in breast reconstruction. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 56(4), 365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gehrke, C., Li, H., Sant, H., Gale, B., & Agarwal, J. (2014). Design, fabrication and testing of a novel vascular coupling device. Biomedical Microdevices, 16(1), 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Tachi, K., Furukawa, K. S., Koshima, I., & Ushida, T. (2011). New microvascular anastomotic ring-coupling device using negative pressure. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 64(9), 1187–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Katz, R. D., Rosson, G. D., Taylor, J. A., & Singh, N. K. (2005). Robotics in microsurgery: Use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig. Microsurgery, 25(7), 566–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Taleb, C., Nectoux, E., & Liverneaux, P. (2009). Limb replantation with two robots: A feasibility study in a pig model. Microsurgery, 29(3), 232–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Saleh, D. B., Syed, M., Kulendren, D., Ramakrishnan, V., & Liverneaux, P. A. (2015). Plastic and reconstructive robotic microsurgery—A review of current practices. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique, 60(4), 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations