Advertisement

Sustainability of Higher Educational Buildings: Retrofitting Measures to Enhance Energy Performance—The Case of AASTMT Business Management School Building, Egypt

  • Mohsen Aboulnaga
  • Ayman Wanas
  • Mohamed Hammad
  • Mohamed Hussein
Conference paper

Abstract

Buildings compose the highest portion of global CO2 emissions from different sectors (approximately 5.5 Gt CO2-eq.). According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Egypt is among those nations that will be heavily affected by the impact of climate change, even though its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions represent only 1 % of the world’s GHG emissions. Electricity consumption in public buildings, including administrative, educational, and healthcare-related buildings, is 9 % – the second largest category after residential buildings at 40 %. Enhancing energy performance in higher education and residential buildings will have a significant impact on the reduction of electrical energy consumption, resource efficiency, and the nation’s energy footprint. Energy consumption in educational buildings depends on activities, time of use, and influx of visitors, students, and academic staff, as well as the academic term, that is, winter or summer. Retrofitting measures are important for reducing energy consumption in higher educational buildings and cooling requirements in a hot climate. The most important measures in the retrofitting process of the building envelope, including its roof, are mainly the glazing type and characteristics and the thermal insulation of walls. This chapter focuses on sustainability measures of the Business Management School building at the Arab Academy of Science, Technology & Maritime Transport campus in Cairo, Egypt. The objective is to set a baseline assessment of the building’s energy use and compare it with energy performance after retrofitting measures and simulations. This includes upgrading the glazing with a shading coefficient from 0.81 to 0.35, a wall thermal insulation of the building’s envelope from 4.8 to 1.15 W/Km2, and a green roof. Results show that applying these retrofitting measures led to a reduction in energy use by 27 % from the baseline average energy use of 14.6 kWh/m2 yearly and was further reduced to 495 kWh when a green roof with a U-value of 0.14 W/m2 K was applied.

Keywords

Sustainability Retrofitting Energy use Energy conservation Higher education building CO2 emission 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to Prof Tarek Abdin, Dean of the Business School, for his support and providing access to building information and spaces. Thanks go to the administrative staff for providing the walk-through and technical data. Finally, I thank research students Mohamed Hassan and Heba Sarag for their assistance during data gathering in connection with the energy audit. Last but not least, I sincerely express my gratitude to Architect Mohamed Hammad for running the simulations.

References

  1. 1.
    Gouldson A, Colenbrander S, Sudmant A, Godfrey N, Millward-Hopkins J, Fang W, Zhao X (2015) Accelerating low-carbon development in the world’s cities. In: Contributing paper for seizing the global opportunity: partnerships for better growth and a better climate—new climate economy, London and Washington, DC. http://newclimateeconomy.report/misc/working-papers
  2. 2.
    Zhang T, Siebers P, Aickelin U (2011) Modelling electricity consumption in office buildings: an agent based approach. Energy Build 43:2882–2892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    European Commission Joint Research Centre http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/energyefficiency/html/standby_initiative_data_centers.htm. Accessed 16 May 2015
  5. 5.
    Gallachoir BPO, Keane M, Morrissey E, O’Donnell J (2007) Using indicators to profile energy consumption & to inform energy policy in a university: a case study in Ireland. Energy Build 39:913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yao R, Steemers K (2005) A method of formulating energy load profile for domestic buildings in the UK. Energy Build 37(6):663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012) Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build 55:889–902. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778812004227. Accessed 15 May 2015
  8. 8.
    Ozdil OS (2010) Sürdürülebilir Yapılasma Sorunu ve Celik. Turk Yapısal Celik Dernegi http://www.tucsa.org/images/yayinlar/makaleler/Surdurulebilir-Yapilasma-Sorunu-ve-Celik.pdf. Accessed May 2015
  9. 9.
    UKGBC UK Green Building Council (2011) Carbon reductions in existing non-domestic buildings. UK Green Building Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Egyptian German High Level Joint Committee for cooperation on renewable energy and energy efficiency and environmental protection (JCEE). http://www.jcee-eg.net/. Accessed May 2015
  12. 12.
    Liddiard R, Taylor S, Rylat M (2010) Characterising space use and electricity consumption in non-domestic buildings. In: Proceedings of conference: IESD PhD conference: energy and sustainable development, 2010. Institute of energy and sustainable development, De Montfort UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    European Commission Joint Research Centre. http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/energyefficiency/html/standby_initiative_data_centers.htm/. Accessed 16 May 2015
  15. 15.
    Bordass B, Cohen R, Standeven M, Leaman A (2001) Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of probe buildings. Build Res Inform 29(2):114–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bahar B, Berrin SD, Cüneyt D (2009) Energy efficient retrofit methods at the building envelopes of the school buildings. http://www.salford.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/142422/063-Basarir.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2015
  17. 17.
    Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012) Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build 55: 889–902. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778812004227. Accessed 15 May 2015
  18. 18.
    DOR, DOE to fund up to $54 million for retrofit ramp-ups in energy efficiency. http://energy.gov/articles/doe-fund-454-million-retrofit-ramp-ups-energy-efficiency. Accessed 21 May 2015
  19. 19.
    HUD, U.S. http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD. Accessed 11 May 2015
  20. 20.
    Australian Building Codes Board (2011) Energy efficiency general information http://www.abcb.gov.au/index.cfm?objectid=7384D70A-28B9-11DE-835E001B2FB900AA
  21. 21.
    Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Australian Government (2010) Building code of Australia. Http://www.climatechange.gov.au/en/what-you-need-to-know/buildings/commercial/building-code.aspx/. Accessed 5 May 2015
  22. 22.
    DECC, Warmer homes, greener homes: a strategy for household energy management, UK. Department of Energy and Climate Change. http://www.decc.gov.uk. Accessed 7 May 2015
  23. 23.
    Gul MS, Patidar S (2015) Understanding the energy consumption and occupancy of a multi-purpose academic building. Energy Build 87:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2011) Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(1):460–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Http://www.ecbcs.org/annexes/annex36.htm. Accessed 26 May 2015Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Boer J (2003) IEA ECBCS Annex 36: retrofitting of educational buildings—REDUCE, energy concept adviser for technical retrofit measures. International energy agency, Energy conservation in building & community, December 2003. http://www.annex36.com/eca/uk/06util/pdf/A36SubtaskC_Report_AuditProcedures.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2015
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Syed A (2012) Advanced building technologies for sustainability. Wiley, New York, p 115Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Standards Australia, Australia/New Zealand standard: Energy audits: (AS/NZ 3598:2000), Standards Australia International Ltd., and Standards New Zealand 2000, ISNB: 0733735762Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Standards Australia, Australia/New Zealand standard: energy audits: part 1—commercial buildings (AS/NZ 3598.1:2014), Standards Australia International Ltd., and Standards New Zealand 2000, ISNB: 9781775514992. http://shop.standards.co.nz/catalog/3598.1:2014(AS%7CNZS)/scope?
  31. 31.
    ASHREA (2011) ASHRAE handbook, HVAC application, Atlanta 2011Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Climate consultant software based on Cairo weather files of US Department of energyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Richman EE Requirements for lighting levels. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, https://www.wbdg.org/pdfs/usace_lightinglevels.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2015

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

<SimplePara><Emphasis Type="Bold">Open Access</Emphasis> This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. </SimplePara> <SimplePara>The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.</SimplePara>

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohsen Aboulnaga
    • 1
  • Ayman Wanas
    • 2
  • Mohamed Hammad
    • 1
  • Mohamed Hussein
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Arab Academy for Science, Technology & Maritime Transport, AASTMTCairoEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Architecture and Environmental Design, AASTMTCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations