Advertisement

Using Ontologies to Develop and Test a Certification and Inspection Data Infrastructure Building Block

  • Joanne S. Luciano
  • Djoko S. Sayogo
  • Weijia RanEmail author
  • Nicolau Depaula
  • Holly Jarman
  • Luis F. Luna-Reyes
  • Giri K. Tayi
  • Jing Zhang
  • Jana Hrdinova
  • Deborah Lines Andersen
  • David F. Andersen
  • Theresa A. Pardo
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 26)

Abstract

Global markets for information-intensive products contain sharp information asymmetries that lead to market inefficiencies resulting from consumer purchasing decisions that are based on incomplete information. Elimination or reduction of such information asymmetries has long been the goal of governments as well as various nongovernmental entities that recognize that addressing issues such as sustainable production, socially just labor practices, and reduction in energy needs and health expenditure is closely linked to consumers being fully aware of the economic, environmental, and social impacts of their purchasing decisions. This chapter reports on the creation of ontology-enabled interoperable data infrastructure based on semantic technologies that would enable information sharing in traditionally information-restricted markets. The main technical result is a proof-of-concept set of data standards built on semantic technology applications and the functionalities of formal ontology of certification and inspection processes. The current proof of concept focuses specifically on certified fair-trade coffee, and while its applicability is currently limited, it has the potential to become universally applicable to any certification and inspection process for any product and service. In addition to producing a number of artifacts relevant to the expandability of the work, such as domain ontologies, the research indicates that while big data systems are necessary, they are not sufficient to create high levels of consumer trust. By testing the criteria using both hand-generated and automated queries, we are able to demonstrate that CIDIBB (Certification and Inspection Data Infrastructure Building Block) is not only able to test the trustworthiness of certification schemes but also that our ontology generates consistent results.

Keywords

Ontology Virtual certificates Certificates Semantic applications Ontology validation Certification ontology 

References

  1. Albersmeier, F., Schulze, H., Jahn, G., & Spiller, A. (2009). The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: From checklists to risk-oriented auditing. Food Control, 20(10), 927–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora, R. (2006). Product positioning based on search, experience and credence attributes using conjoint analysis. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(4/5), 285–292. http://doi.org/10.1108/10610420610685695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berners-Lee, T. (2006, July 27). Linked data. Retrieved from Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked data. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bizer, C., Heath, T., & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked Data – The Story So Far: International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009081901.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An Exploratory Study into the Factors Impeding Ethical Consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deaton, B. J. (2004). A theoretical framework for examining the role of third-party certifiers. Food Control, 15(8), 615–619. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2003.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimitri, C., & Greene, C. (2002). Recent growth patterns in the U.S. organic food markets. Economic Research Service (No. #AIB-777). Washington, DC 20036: US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/255720/aib777fm_1_.pdf
  9. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., Benbastat, I., McKnight, H., Stewart, K., & Straub, D. W. (2006). ICIS panel summary should institutional trust matter in information systems research? Communications of the AIS, 17, 205–222.Google Scholar
  11. Goleman, D. (2009). Ecological intelligence: How knowing the hidden impacts of what we buy can change everything (1st ed.). New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, M., & Haarstad, H. (2011). Transparency and development: Ethical consumption through web 2.0 and the internet of things. Nformation Technologies & International Development, 7(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  13. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220. http://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jahn, G., Schramm, M., & Spiller, A. (2005). The reliability of certification: Quality labels as a consumer policy tool. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jarman, H., et al. (2011). I-choose: Consumer choice, digital government, and sustainability in North America. Presented at the APPAM Fall Research Conference. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, G.-S., Lee, G. Y., & Park, K. (2010). A cross-national investigation on how ethical consumers build loyalty toward fair trade brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 589–611. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0486-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Zhang, J., Roy, R., Andersen, D. F., Whitmore, A., & Andersen, D. L. (2013). Information strategies to support full information product pricing: The role of trust. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 18(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  18. Makower, J. (2010, November 1). Is TerraChoice Greenwashing? Retrieved from http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2010/11/01/terrachoice-greenwashing
  19. Powell, W. (1996). Trust-based forms of governance. In T. Tyler & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 51–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sayogo, D. S., et al. (Forthcoming). Ontological modeling of certification and inspection process to support smart disclosure of product information. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age.Google Scholar
  22. Shapiro, D. L., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8(4), 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanner, B. (2000). Independent assessment by third-party certification bodies. Food Control, 11(5), 415–417. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(99)00055-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. TerraChoice. (2010). Greenwashing Report 2010. Retrieved from http://sinsofgreenwashing.org/findings/greenwashing-report-2010/index.html
  25. Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watts, S., & Wyner, G. (2011). Designing and theorizing the adoption of mobile technology‐mediated ethical consumption tools. Information Technology & People, 24(3), 257–280. http://doi.org/10.1108/09593841111158374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne S. Luciano
    • 1
  • Djoko S. Sayogo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Weijia Ran
    • 4
    Email author
  • Nicolau Depaula
    • 5
  • Holly Jarman
    • 6
  • Luis F. Luna-Reyes
    • 5
  • Giri K. Tayi
    • 7
  • Jing Zhang
    • 8
  • Jana Hrdinova
    • 3
  • Deborah Lines Andersen
    • 5
  • David F. Andersen
    • 9
  • Theresa A. Pardo
    • 3
  1. 1.Tetherless World ConstellationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and BusinessThe University of MuhammadiyahMalangIndonesia
  3. 3.Center for Technology in GovernmentUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  4. 4.System Dynamics SocietyUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  5. 5.Department of InformaticsUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  6. 6.Department of Health Management and PolicySchool of Public Health, University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  7. 7.Department of Information Technology ManagementUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  8. 8.Graduate School of ManagementClark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  9. 9.Department of Public Administration & Policy, Department of InformaticsUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations