Advertisement

China-ASEAN Relations and the South China Sea: Beyond Balancing and Bandwagoning?

  • Elisa I. Hörhager
Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

As China’s rise has provoked shifts in the structure of the international system, no states have felt this as directly as the Southeast Asian nations. The different approaches used in past analyses of China’s rise and its relationship with ASEAN have led to widely different interpretations. This is due to the differing views on how states behave in the face of change in the international system. The complex reality of international relations surrounding the South China Sea as well as the largely differing interpretations of China-ASEAN relations in scholarly literature necessitate an open approach taking into account multiple existing paradigms. This chapter employs analytical eclecticism in order to comprehensively assess China’s behavior towards ASEAN and the extent to which the ASEAN framework has been able to divert traditional balance of power dynamics and alliance formation in the face of this rising power. In a final section, their relationship is put into the context of the South China Sea dispute and the most recent developments in that area. This reflects back on the explanatory value of different international relations paradigms and serves to clarify the assumption that if ASEAN cannot manage to find a multilateral solution in the South China Sea, this might mean that realism and hard power trumps after all and that China’s true revisionist nature is revealed.

Keywords

China ASEAN relations China Southeast Asia relations South China Sea Analytical eclecticism 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58, 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendshorst, J. (2009). The dilemma of non-interference: Myanmar, human rights, and the ASEAN charter. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 8(1), 102–121.Google Scholar
  4. Asia Society. (2014). Vietnam's place in the world order. Accessed February 2, 2015, from http://asiasociety.org/video/vietnams-place-world-order-complete
  5. Ba, A. D. (2003). China and ASEAN: Renavigating relations for a 21st-century Asia. Asian Survey, 43(4), 622–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beeson, M. (2010). Asymmetrical regionalism: China, Southeast Asia and uneven development. East Asia, 27, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellamy, A. J., & Drummond, C. (2011). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Between non-interference and sovereignty as responsibility. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beukel, E. (2010). China and the South China Sea: Two faces of power in the rising China’s neighborhood policy. DIIS Working Paper, 7, 7–26.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, S. (2010). An odd thing happened on the way to balancing: East Asian states’ reactions to China’s rise. International Studies Review, 12, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. China Daily. (2012). Hu meets overseas organizations leaders. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2012-04/09/content_15007664.htm
  11. Clinton, H. (2011). America’s Pacific Century. Foreign Policy. Accessed February 2, 2015, from http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacificcentury/
  12. Desch, M. C. (1998). Culture clash: Assessing the importance of ideas in security studies. International Security, 23(1), 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Do, T. T. (2015). Vietnam’s moderate diplomacy successfully navigating difficult waters. Accessed February 2, 2015, from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/01/16/vietnams-moderate-diplomacy-successfully-navigating-difficult-waters/
  14. Eaton, S., & Stubbs, R. (2006). Is ASEAN powerful? Neo-realist versus constructivist approaches to power in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emmers, R. (2003). Cooperative security and the balance of power in ASEAN and the ARF. London: RutledgeCurzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emmerson, D. K. (2005). Security, community and democracy in Southeast Asia: Analyzing ASEAN. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fels, E. (2012). Power shift? Power in international relations and the allegiance of middle powers. In E. Fels et al. (Eds.), Power in the 21 st century, global power shift (pp. 2–28). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goh, E. (2005). Great powers and Southeast Asian regional security strategies: Omni-enmeshment, balancing and hierarchical order. Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies Singapore, Working Paper Series 84, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston, A. I. (2003). Is China a status quo power? International Security, 27(4), 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, L. (2011). ASEAN, sovereignty and intervention in Southeast Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang, D. C. (2003). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security, 27(4), 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katzenstein, P. J., & Okawara, N. (2001/2002). Japan, Asian-Pacific security, and the case for analytical eclecticism. International Security, 26(3), 153–185.Google Scholar
  23. Kirshner, J. (2012). The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European Journal of International Relations, 53(53), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kurlantzick, J. (2007). Charm offensive: How China’s soft power is transforming the world. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lim, K. S. (2015). Partners join forces in ‘belt and road’ project. Accessed March 30, 2015, from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2015-03/18/content_19844959.htm
  26. Manila Bulletin. (2014). China assures PH is part of Maritime Silk Road plan. Accessed February 2, 2015, from http://www.mb.com.ph/china-assures-ph-is-part-of-maritime-silk-road-plan/
  27. Manila Times. (2014). China not bypassing PH in ‘maritime silk road’. Accessed February 2, 2015 from http://www.manilatimes.net/breaking_news/china-bypassing-ph-maritime-silk-road/
  28. Manyin, M. E., Daggett, S., Dolven, B., Lawrence, S. V., Martin, M. F., O’Rourke, R., et al. (2012). Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama administration’s “rebalancing” toward Asia. CRS report for congress, Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  29. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Morgenthau, H. J. (1973). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (4th ed.). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  31. Mulvenon, J. C., Tanner, M. S., Chase, M. S., Frelinger, D., Gompert, D. C., Libicki, M. C., et al. (2006). Chinese responses to U.S. military transformation and implications for the department of defense. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  32. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Cambridge, MA: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  33. Pattiradjawane, R. L., & Soebagjo, N. (2015). Global maritime axis: Indonesia, China, and a new approach to Southeast Asian regional resilience. International Journal of China Studies, 6(2), 175–186.Google Scholar
  34. People’s Daily Online. (2003). China joins Treat of Amity, Cooperation in Southeast Asia. http://en.people.cn/200310/08/eng20031008_125556.shtml
  35. People’s Daily Online. (2004). China to continue to pursue new security concept for world peace. Accessed February 22, 2015, from http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200412/27/eng20041227_168809.html
  36. Roy, D. (2005). Southeast Asia and China: Balancing or bandwagoning? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 27(2), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rüland, J. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: Theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. The Pacific Review, 31(3), 421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rüland, J., & Jetschke, A. (2008). 40 years of ASEAN: Perspectives, performance and lessons for change. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schweller, R. L. (1994). Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, 19(1), 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schweller, R. L. (1997). New realist research on alliances. Refining, not refuting Waltz’s balancing proposition. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 927–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schweller, R. L. (1999). Managing the rise of great power: History and theory. In A. I. Johnston & R. S. Ross (Eds.), Engaging China: The management of an emerging power (pp. 1–31). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Schweller, R. L. (2004). Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of underbalancing. International Security, 29(2), 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schweller, R. L. (2006). Unanswered threats: Political constraints on the balance of power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schweller, R. L., & Pu, X. (2011). After unipolarity: China’s vision of international order in an era of U.S. decline. International Security, 36(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scobell, A., & Nathan, A. J. (2012). China’s overstretched military. Washington Quarterly, 35(4), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shambaugh, D. (2004/2005). China engages Asia: Reshaping the regional order. International Security, 29(3), 64–99.Google Scholar
  47. Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sina English. (2012). Wen praises ASEAN way in handling territorial disputes. Accessed February 2, 2015, from http://english.sina.com/china/p/2012/1119/528412.html
  49. Stubbs, R. (2002). ASEAN plus three: Emerging East Asian regionalism? Asian Survey, 42(3), 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thayer, C. A. (2012). ASEAN’s code of conduct in the South China Sea: A litmus test for community-building? The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(3). Accessed February 2, 2015, from http://www.japanfocus.org/-Carlyle_A_-Thayer/3813
  51. Walt, S. M. (1985). Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International Security, 4(9), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  53. Wong, L. F. (2007). China-ASEAN and Japan-ASEAN relations during the post-cold war era. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 1, 373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright, Q. (1964). A study of war (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Yang, J. (2015, March 28). Jointly building the 21st century maritime silk road by deepening mutual trust and enhancing connectivity. Accessed March 30, 2015, from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1249761.shtml
  56. Ye, M. (2011). The rise of China and East Asian regionalism. In M. Beeson & R. Stubbs (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Asian regionalism (pp. 251–262). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Yuan, J. D. (2006). China-ASEAN relations: Perspectives, prospects and implications for U.S. interests. Strategic Studies Institute. Accessed February 2, 2013, http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub735.pdf
  58. Zhao, S. (2006). China’s pragmatic nationalism: Is it manageable? The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations